Acetabular Fracture Outcomes and Complications: An International Comparison.

Introduction: Despite the groundbreaking research by Judet and Letournel in the 1960s, the specific equipment, surgical approach, fixation strategy, and post-operative course for treating acetabular fractures have not been standardized. Therefore, this study aimed to compare technological resources, operative procedures, and post-operative complications between patients treated for acetabular fractures in Romania and the United States (U.S.). Methods: Between February 2011 and August 2018, a total of 116 Romanian patients and 373 U.S. patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures. Data were collected prospectively for Romania and retrospectively for the U.S. The authors used T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and odds ratios to analyze categorical data while ordinal date were assessed using logistic regression. Results: U.S. patients had higher comorbidity rates for diabetes, obesity, and hypertension. However, the initial quality of reduction, graded with Matta's criteria, was similar between American and Romanian patients. Post-operatively, U.S. patients had significantly higher Brooker criteria scores for heterotopic ossification. Rates of deep vein thrombosis, infections, sciatic nerve lesions, and loss of reduction between the two countries were not significantly different. Conclusions: Given the similar initial reduction quality despite technological differences, the authors suggest that fundamental factors, such as surgeon training and experience, may have a greater impact than the availability of technologically advanced operative resources. Future research focusing on the efficacy of these advanced resources for acetabular fracture fixation could help determine their true impact on patient outcomes and improve the cost-effectiveness of this surgery.

Augmented Stress Weight-bearing CT for Evaluation of Subtle Lisfranc Injuries in the Elite Athlete.

BACKGROUND: Lisfranc injuries refer to a disruption or displacement of the tarsometatarsal joint of the foot. Subtle Lisfranc injuries can go undiagnosed on conventional imaging leading to devastating consequences and poor functional outcomes for elite athletes. Objective. The objective of this case study is to present a novel imaging technique using weight-bearing computed tomography (CT) with enhanced stress to identify subtle, dynamically unstable Lisfranc injuries. We illustrate this with a case presentation of an elite athlete who ultimately required surgical fixation for a subtle Lisfranc injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To perform an augmented stress weight-bearing CT, the patient was positioned standing, with their feet facing forward, and weight equally distributed. The patient was then coached to symmetrically raise both heels from the scanner platform. This plantarflexion provided augmented stress on the midfoot, allowing for more sensitive imaging of the Lisfranc injury. The weight-bearing CT and augmented stress images undergo 3D reconstruction and postprocessing to render coronal and sagittal images, allowing for comparison of the standard weight-bearing and augmented stress images. RESULTS: We present the case of a 22-year-old collegiate football lineman sustaining a Lisfranc injury. The injury diagnosis was made by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical examination, without evidence of injury on weight-bearing XR or standard weight-bearing CT. With augmented stress CT imaging, the Lisfranc instability was noted, leading to surgical fixation, and return to sport the next season. CONCLUSION: We propose this technique for diagnosing subtle, unstable Lisfranc injuries where clinical suspicion persists despite inconclusive imaging, particularly in elite athletes. Further research is needed with larger sample sizes to investigate the sensitivity of this novel imaging technique for the detection of Lisfranc injury. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level 4: Case Report.

Utility of 3D reformatted images in the diagnosis of sternoclavicular joint injury.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of musculoskeletal radiologists to diagnose sternoclavicular joint injuries in the standard CT imaging planes compared to 3D volume rendered images to define the most accurate plane to improve prospective diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective query of our institutional database was performed. Twenty-six patients with a diagnosis of sternoclavicular joint injury, who had been evaluated with CT and treated by orthopedic surgery, and 30 control patients who did not have a sternoclavicular joint injury were included for analysis. Two blinded radiologists with specialty training in musculoskeletal radiology independently reviewed axial, coronal, sagittal, and 3D reformatted CT images and documented whether injury was present or not present. RESULTS: Accuracy was good for both radiologists on all views. It was lowest on the sagittal view for both readers. Accuracy was highest for the 3D view. When comparing the accuracy of the four views for each radiologist, there was a significant difference for Radiologist A, whose 3D images were more accurate compared to the axial and sagittal views. There was no significant difference for Radiologist B. There was good inter-reader agreement, which was highest on the 3D images. CONCLUSION: 3D volume renderings of the sternoclavicular joints have the potential to improve radiologist accuracy for detection of sternoclavicular joint injury/dislocation in the setting of chest well trauma, which could decrease instances of missed or delayed diagnosis.

Incidental posterior rib hyperostosis on chest CT: incidence and etiology.

OBJECTIVE: Incidental rib hyperostosis is defined as asymmetric cortical thickening and sclerosis of the medial posterior ribs and is important because it may lead to unnecessary laboratory testing, additional imaging and occasionally biopsy. The purpose of this study is to identify the incidence of rib hyperostosis within different patient groups known to have an increased propensity towards osteophyte formation and ankylosis. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study reviewing chest CT examinations in a control group of patients over 50 years old and three different patient populations: psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Each CT was evaluated by an attending musculoskeletal and cardiothoracic radiologist to identify rib hyperostosis, osteophyte formation, ankylosis, and spinal curvature. Two senior radiology residents also performed consensus reads and inter-reader reliability was calculated between the two groups. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-two individuals were included in the study of which 38 (13.5%) had at least one hyperostotic rib. The ankylosing spondylitis population and the DISH population had the highest incidence of rib hyperostosis with a relative risk of 5.6 (p = 0.012) and 5.3 (p = < 0.001) when compared to the control group. There was good inter-reader reliability for the presence of rib hyperostosis with a kappa estimate of 0.739. CONCLUSION: Incidentally detected rib hyperostosis is most likely the sequela of abnormal stress on the ribs secondary to rib hypomobility from fusion at the costovertebral joint. The incidence of rib hyperostosis is markedly increased in the DISH and ankylosis spondylitis study populations.