Prognostic factors for complications after loop ileostomy reversal.

BACKGROUND: Defunctioning ileostomy creation and closure are both associated with morbidity. There is little data available about complications after ileostomy closure. The aim of this study was to evaluate morbidity related to loop ileostomy closure (LIC) and to determine if patients with postoperative complications in primary surgery suffer from more postoperative complications during stoma closure. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on prospectively registered consecutive patients undergoing elective LIC in a single centre in Spain between April 2010 and December 2017. Baseline characteristics, postoperative complications after primary surgery and after stoma closure were recorded. Primary surgery included any colorectal resection, elective or urgent associated with a diverting loop ileostomy either as a protective stoma or rescue procedure. A logistic regression model was used to assess the effects of baseline variables and postoperative complications after primary surgery on the existence of postoperative complications related to LIC. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-eight patients (288 men, median age 64.5 years [IQR 55.1-72.3 years]) were included in the study, and 37.4%, developed complications after LIC. The most common was paralytic ileus. Only chronic kidney disease (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.03-5.33, p = 0.043), existence of postoperative complications after primary surgery (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.41-3.66, p = < 0.001) and ileostomy closure later than 10 months after primary surgery (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.00-2.33, p = 0.049) were statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic kidney disease, those who had any complication after primary surgery and those who had LIC > 10 months after primary surgery have a significantly higher risk of developing postoperative complications.

Short-course radiotherapy in stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease

Introduction Stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease presents challenging issues, as the radical treatment of the whole disease is difficult. Surgery and chemotherapy (CT) play an unquestionable role, but the contribution of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) is not very clear. Methods In 2009, we established a prospective treatment protocol that included CT, short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCRT) with surgery of the primary tumour and all metastatic locations. Results Forty patients were included. Eight (20%) patients did not receive CT due to significant comorbidities. Radical surgery treatment was possible in 22 (55%) patients. The mean follow-up was 42.81 months (3.63–105.97). Overall survival at 24 and 36 months was 71.4% and 58.2%, respectively. There was good local control of the disease, as 97.2% of pelvic surgeries were R0 and there were no local recurrences. Conclusion In stage IV with resectable metastatic disease, the proposed therapeutic regimen seems very appropriate in well selected patients able to tolerate the treatment. We bet on the role of pelvic RT, due to the good local control of the disease in our series (AU)

Short-course radiotherapy in stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease.

INTRODUCTION: Stage IV rectal cancer with resectable disease presents challenging issues, as the radical treatment of the whole disease is difficult. Surgery and chemotherapy (CT) play an unquestionable role, but the contribution of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) is not very clear. METHODS: In 2009, we established a prospective treatment protocol that included CT, short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCRT) with surgery of the primary tumour and all metastatic locations. RESULTS: Forty patients were included. Eight (20%) patients did not receive CT due to significant comorbidities. Radical surgery treatment was possible in 22 (55%) patients. The mean follow-up was 42.81 months (3.63-105.97). Overall survival at 24 and 36 months was 71.4% and 58.2%, respectively. There was good local control of the disease, as 97.2% of pelvic surgeries were R0 and there were no local recurrences. CONCLUSION: In stage IV with resectable metastatic disease, the proposed therapeutic regimen seems very appropriate in well selected patients able to tolerate the treatment. We bet on the role of pelvic RT, due to the good local control of the disease in our series.

Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with severe low anterior resection syndrome: randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is challenging. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) can improve select bowel disorders. An RCT was conducted to assess the efficacy of PTNS compared with sham stimulation in patients with severe LARS. METHOD: This was a multicentre, double-blind RCT. Patients with major LARS score were allocated to receive PTNS or sham therapy (needle placement simulation without nerve stimulation). The study included 16 sessions of 30 min once a week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by four additional sessions once a fortnight for the following 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was efficacy of PTNS defined by the LARS score 12 months after treatment. Secondary endpoints included faecal incontinence, quality of life (QoL), and sexual function. RESULTS: Between September 2016 and July 2018, 46 eligible patients were assigned randomly in a 1 : 1 ratio to PTNS or sham therapy. Baseline characteristics were similar. LARS scores were reduced in both groups, but only patients who received PTNS maintained the effect in the long term (mean(s.d.) score 36.4(3.9) at baseline versus 30.7(11.5) at 12 months; P = 0.018; effect size -5.4, 95 per cent c.i. -9.8 to -1.0), with a mean reduction of 15.7 per cent at 12-month follow-up. The faecal incontinence score was improved after 12 months in the PTNS group (mean(s.d.) score 15.4(5.2) at baseline versus 12.5(6.4) at 12 months; P = 0.018). No major changes in QoL and sexual function were observed in either group. There was no therapy-associated morbidity. Three patients discontinued the study, but none owing to study-related issues. CONCLUSION: PTNS has positive effects in some patients with major LARS, especially in those with faecal incontinence. Registration number: NCT02517853 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Update on advances and controversy in rectal cancer treatment.

Changes in the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer have been recently proposed. We performed a comprehensive review of the current data on neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, focussing on chemoradiotherapy treatment and timing of surgery. Six components were proposed as the framework for the treatment of rectal cancer: neoadjuvant therapy and changing patterns in patient selection, long- or short-course radiotherapy, adverse effects of radiotherapy, timing of surgery, non-operative management of rectal cancer and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Lack of a consistent difference in terms of local recurrence has been observed between short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy. Indications for preoperative radiotherapy have been reconsidered in the last years. An interval of 10-11 weeks seemed to be the optimal timing, with no impact on patient safety. Since assessment criteria of clinical complete response are not well defined, and the basis for non-operative management of rectal cancer is still not clear, further investigations are required. There is controversy about standard treatments for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer that are being analyzed by ongoing studies. Tailored treatments could avoid over-treatment for a large number of patients without any impairment of the oncologic results.

Emergency surgery for perforated diverticulitis in the immunosuppressed patient.

AIM: Immunosuppression is believed to worsen outcomes for patients who require surgery for perforated diverticulitis. The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes between immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for complicated diverticulitis. METHOD: All patients who underwent emergency surgery for complicated diverticulitis between 2004 and 2012 in a single unit were studied. Patients were classified as immunosuppressed (group I) or immunocompetent (group II). Operation type and postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between groups. The impact of operating surgeons' specialization and the Peritonitis Severity Score (PSS) were also evaluated to determine their impact on the restoration of gastrointestinal (GI) continuity. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixteen patients (mean age: 63.7 years), 41.4% women, were included. Fifty-three (45.7%) patients were immunosuppressed (group I): 42 underwent Hartmann's procedure (HP) (79.2%), nine (17.0%) underwent resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) with ileostomy (IL) and two (3.8%) underwent RPA without IL. In group II, 15 HP (23.8%), nine RPA with IL (14.3%) and 39 RPA without IL (61.9%) were performed. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 79.2% and 26.4%, respectively, in group I and 63.5% and 6.3%, respectively, in group II. The overall mean PSS was 9.5, with a mean PSS of 11.1 in group I and of 8.1 in group II. The decision to perform a primary anastomosis differed significantly between colorectal surgeons and general surgeons in the patients with a PSS of 9-10-11. CONCLUSION: In immunocompromised patients, RPA with IL can be a safe surgical option, whereas HP should be reserved for patients with a PSS of > 11. Colorectal surgical specialization is associated with higher rates of restoration of GI continuity in patients with perforated diverticulitis, especially in patients with an intermediate PSS score. Evaluation of each patient's PSS facilitates decision making in surgery for perforated diverticulitis.

Clinicopathological risk factors of Stage II colon cancer: results of a prospective study.

AIM: Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy has demonstrated benefit in Stage III colon cancer but still remains controversial in Stage II. The aim of this study was to analyse the prognostic impact of clinicopathological factors that may help guide treatment decisions in Stage II colon cancer. METHOD: Between 1996 and 2006 data from patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer at Hospital Universitari Bellvitge and its referral comprehensive cancer centre Institut Català d'Oncologia/L'Hospitalet were prospectively included in a database. We identified 432 patients with Stage II colon cancer operated on at Hospital Universitari Bellvitge. The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and colon-cancer-specific survival (CCSS) were determined. RESULTS: The 5-year RFS and CCSS were 83% and 88%, respectively. Lymphovascular or perineural invasion was associated with RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.84; 95% CI 1.01-3.35]. Gender (women, HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.23-1) and lymphovascular or perineural invasion (HR 3.51; 95% CI 1.86-6.64) together with pT4 (HR 2.79; 95% CI 1.44-5.41) influenced CCSS. In multivariate analysis pT4 and lymphovascular or perineural invasion remained significantly associated with CCSS. We performed a risk index with these factors with prognostic impact. Patients with pT4 tumours and lymphovascular or perineural invasion had a 5-year CCSS of 61%vs the 93% (HR 5.87; 95 CI 2.46-13.97) of those without any of these factors. CONCLUSION: pT4 and lymphatic, venous or perineural invasion are confirmed as significant prognostic factors in Stage II colon cancer and should be taken into account in the clinical validation process of new molecular prognostic factors.

Differences between proximal and distal obstructing colonic cancer after curative surgery.

AIM: To study any possible differences in morbidity, mortality and overall survival rate after curative surgery for obstructive colon cancer according to tumour location. METHOD: From January 1994 to December 2006, patients with colonic cancer presenting as obstruction were analysed. The two groups were defined as proximal and distal according to the tumour location with respect to the splenic flexure. In relation to the surgeon specialization, patients were operated on by a colorectal surgeon and by a general surgeon. Postoperative morbidity and mortality and cancer-related survival at 3 years were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 377 patients included in the study, there were 173 patients (45.9%) in the proximal group and 204 patients (54.1%) in the distal group. The global morbidity was 54.9% without differences in postoperative morbidity except for anastomotic leakage, which was higher in the proximal group (P < 0.014). No differences in postoperative mortality were observed. After patients were stratified by the tumour node metastasis system, the differences between the groups, with respect to 3-year overall survival, cancer-related survival and probability of being free from recurrence, did not reach statistical significance. The overall survival after radical surgery for colonic obstruction was 57.6%. CONCLUSION: Mortality and morbidity after emergency surgery for obstructing colon cancer are high. Specialization in colorectal surgery influences postoperative results in terms of lower anastomotic dehiscence rate after emergency proximal colon resection. After radical surgery, tumour location does not appear to influence the prognosis of obstructive colon cancer.

Outcomes in the management of obstructive unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer.

AIM: To analyze short term results and to report survival rates in a series of patients after palliative emergency treatment for obstructive left sided colorectal cancer (CRC) with unresectable synchronous metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2004 to 2008, 55 patients were included. Palliative management consisted of stenting to recover bowel patency and starting chemotherapy. Indications for surgery were perforation or failure of stenting. Early failure occurred when decompression after insertion was unsuccessful and late failure when obstruction occurred after successful decompression. Morbidity and mortality were analyzed for stenting and surgery and survival for resected and non-resected patients. RESULTS: Stenting was scheduled in 49 patients.Morbidity and mortality occurred in 5 and 3 patients respectively. Early failure occurred in 4 patients and late failure in 11 patients. Surgery was indicated in 6 patients for peritonitis at diagnosis and in 11 patients for complications (1 case) or stenting failure (10 cases). Of the 17 operated patients, 12 cases were resected and 5 cases were not. Mortality occurred in 1 case. Resected patients received first-line (12 cases) and second-line (5 cases) systemic chemotherapy based on FOLFIRI or FOLFOX while stented and non-resected patients were similarly treated in 37 cases and 12 cases respectively. Overall survival at 2 years was 39.3% in resected patients and 1% in stented and non-resected patients (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Stenting in palliative stage IV obstructive CRC patients may be less successful as previously thought. Prospective studies are needed to define the role of palliative resection.

Tumor sólido pseudopapilar de páncreas: diagnóstico y tratamiento curativo / Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: diagnosis andcurative treatment

Objetivos: dar a conocer a través de una serie de casos clínicosuna entidad poco frecuente, con una presentación clínica yunos hallazgos radiológicos concretos, que permiten establecer undiagnóstico y un tratamiento que será en la mayoría de los casoscurativo.Pacientes y métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivode los casos diagnosticados y tratados quirúrgicamenteen una Unidad Pancreático-Biliar de un hospital universitario, duranteel periodo comprendo entre marzo de 1999 y septiembrede 2005.Resultados: la incidencia fue de 6 pacientes mujeres, con unaedad media de 33,5 años (rango 11-72). La clínica más comúnfue la de dolor y masa abdominal palpable. La tomografía computerizadafue diagnóstica en tres de las pacientes, en las tres restantesse estableció el diagnóstico diferencial con el tumor neuroendocrino.El tratamiento quirúrgico fue individualizado a cadapaciente según los hallazgos y las imágenes visualizadas en la tomografíacomputerizada. El estudio anatomopatológico confirmóel diagnóstico de presunción, informándose de un caso de carcinomasólido-pseudopapilar de páncreas. La estancia hospitalariafue de 18,16 días (rango 8-30). Mortalidad de 0%. En el seguimientocon una media de 46,3 meses (rango 12-76), no existenrecidivas.Conclusiones: la presencia en una mujer joven de una lesiónvoluminosa en el páncreas, debe hacernos pensar en el tumor sólidopseudopapilar. Debido a su bajo potencial de malignidad y ala existencia de unos patrones radiológicos concretos, su diagnósticodebe ser preciso, ya que el tratamiento quirúrgico radical escurativo

Objectives: to highlight an infrequent occurrence using a seriesof clinical cases with symptoms and signs, and specific radiologicalfindings allowing its diagnosis and treatment, which is inmost cases successful.Patients and methods: a descriptive and retrospective studyof patients diagnosed by computed tomography scanning andthen treated with surgery in the Pancreas and Biliary Unit of aUniversity Hospital from March 1999 to September 2005.Results: there were 6 female patients with a mean age of33.5 years (range 11-72). Most common signs included pain anda palpable mass in the abdomen. Three patients were diagnosedby computed tomography scanning, and a differential diagnosiswith a neuroendocrine tumor was performed for the remainingthree subjects. Surgical treatment was adapted to each patient accordingto the findings and images seen in their computed tomographyscans. Biopsy results confirmed the presumed diagnoses,and showed one case of solid pseudopapillary carcinoma of thepancreas. Average hospital stay was of 18.16 days (range 8-30).Mortality rate was 0%. No recurrences occurred during follow-upfor 46.3 months on average (range 12-76).Conclusions: the presence of a huge mass in the pancreas ofa young female should prompt suspicion for a solid pseudopapillarytumor. Given its low malignant potential, and the presence ofspecific radiographic patterns, its diagnosis should be accurate, asradical surgical treatment is effective

Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: diagnosis and curative treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To highlight an infrequent occurrence using a series of clinical cases with symptoms and signs, and specific radiological findings allowing its diagnosis and treatment, which is in most cases successful. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A descriptive and retrospective study of patients diagnosed by computed tomography scanning and then treated with surgery in the Pancreas and Biliary Unit of a University Hospital from March 1999 to September 2005. RESULTS: There were 6 female patients with a mean age of 33.5 years (range 11-72). Most common signs included pain and a palpable mass in the abdomen. Three patients were diagnosed by computed tomography scanning, and a differential diagnosis with a neuroendocrine tumor was performed for the remaining three subjects. Surgical treatment was adapted to each patient according to the findings and images seen in their computed tomography scans. Biopsy results confirmed the presumed diagnoses, and showed one case of solid pseudopapillary carcinoma of the pancreas. Average hospital stay was of 18.16 days (range 8-30). Mortality rate was 0%. No recurrences occurred during follow-up for 46.3 months on average (range 12-76). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a huge mass in the pancreas of a young female should prompt suspicion for a solid pseudopapillary tumor. Given its low malignant potential, and the presence of specific radiographic patterns, its diagnosis should be accurate, as radical surgical treatment is effective.