Fatty liver index as a predictor for type 2 diabetes in subjects with normoglycemia in a nationwide cohort study.

Our aim was to evaluate whether fatty liver index (FLI) is associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) development within the Spanish adult population and according to their prediabetes status; additionally, to examine its incremental predictive value regarding traditional risk factors. A total of 2260 subjects (Prediabetes: 641 subjects, normoglycemia: 1619 subjects) from the Di@bet.es cohort study were studied. Socio-demographic, anthropometric, clinical data and survey on habits were recorded. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed and fasting determinations of glucose, lipids and insulin were made. FLI was calculated and classified into three categories: Low (< 30), intermediate (30-60) and high (> 60). In total, 143 people developed diabetes at follow-up. The presence of a high FLI category was in all cases a significant independent risk factor for the development of diabetes. The inclusion of FLI categories in prediction models based on different conventional T2DM risk factors significantly increase the prediction power of the models when all the population was considered. According to our results, FLI might be considered an early indicator of T2DM development even under normoglycemic condition. The data also suggest that FLI could provide additional information for the prediction of T2DM in models based on conventional risk factors.

Improving management of glycaemic control in people with T2DM in primary care: estimation of the impact on the clinical complications and associated costs.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the potential benefits in terms of avoided complications and cost reduction if the Spanish health system would encourage the intensification of treatment for better glycaemic control in adults with Type 2 diabetes from the current HbA1c target used in clinical practice of 68 mmol/mol to a target of 53 mmol/mol. METHODS: The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (version 9.0) was used to model the impact of these changes in respect of micro- and macrovascular complications and the associated costs. The modelling was based on data derived from the SIDIAP-Q population database from Catalonia, taking a random cohort of 10,000 people with type 2 diabetes and dividing it into sub-groups based on their baseline HbA1c. RESULTS: The CDM modelling showed that the average cost reduction per person varies depending on baseline HbA1c. The model estimates that after 25 years, people with a baseline HbA1c between 48 and 58 mmol/mol and > 75 mmol/mol show an average cost reduction of €6027 and €11,966, respectively. Applying the per-person cost reduction to the cohorts of the prevalent population in Spain (1,910,374) the overall estimated cost reduction was €14.7 billion over 25 years. The improvements in outcomes resulted in an estimated reduction of more than 1.2 million complications cumulatively over 25 years, of which more than 550,000 relate to diabetic foot and more than 170,000 related to renal disease. CONCLUSION: Over a 25 year period, Spain could considerably reduce costs and avoid major complications if, on a population level, more ambitious glycaemic control, according to Spanish or EU guidelines, could be achieved among people with type 2 diabetes by reducing the HbA1c threshold for treatment intensification. Although there is a slower trajectory for benefits in earlier years, there is a much more rapid benefit gain between years 5 and 15.

Estudio ESCRYTO. Diabetes sin enfermedad cardiovascular y grado de control / ESCRYTO study. Diabetes without cardiovascular disease and level of control

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVOS: La diabetes supone un importante factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de enfermedad cardiovascular, principal causa de muerte. El propósito de este estudio fue conocer el grado de control glucémico de los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 sin enfermedad cardiovascular en España, según la determinación más reciente de hemoglobina glucosilada, así como el patrón de tratamiento antidiabético, la incidencia de episodios de hipoglucemia grave en los últimos 6 meses y el grado de control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular, en función del género. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio epidemiológico nacional, multicéntrico y transversal. Participaron 800 médicos asociados a la redGDPS. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 1.059 pacientes, 57% varones. Edad media: 62,7 años en varones vs. 65,2 en mujeres (p < 0,001). Evolución de la diabetes: 9,4±7,5 años. HbA1c media: 7,0% en varones vs. 7,1% en mujeres (p = 0,039). Objetivo de control <7%: 47,2%. En tratamiento con metformina: 65%; inhibidores DPP-4: 62,4%; insulina basal: 14,2%. Incidencia de hipoglucemias graves en los últimos 6 meses: 1,9%. Las mujeres presentaron peor control glucémico, colesterol total, colesterol LDL, obesidad abdominal y filtrado glomerular. CONCLUSIONES: El control glucémico es peor en las mujeres incluso si ajustamos por edad y tiempo de evolución de la diabetes (p = 0,043) y por el número de hipoglucemiantes (p = 0,015). El grado de control es también peor en mujeres para la dislipidemia, obesidad abdominal y filtrado glomerular. Desde Atención Primaria es esencial una estrategia preventiva promocionando estilos de vida saludables y controlando todos los factores de riesgo vascular

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diabetes is a significant risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease, which is the main cause of death. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease in Spain. The data used includes the most recent determination of glycosylated haemoglobin, as well as the pattern of antidiabetic treatment, the incidence of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia in the last 6 months, and the level of control of cardiovascular risk factors, and gender. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national, multicentre, and cross-sectional epidemiological study in which 800 doctors associated with the GDPS network participated. RESULTS: Of the total of 1,059 patients, 57% male, with a mean age of 62.7 years in men vs. 65.2 in women (P<.001). The mean onset of diabetes was 9.4±7.5 years. The mean HbA1C was 7.0% in men vs. 7.1% in women (P=.039), with the control objective of <7% being observed in 47.2%. There were 65% patients on treatment with metformin, and 62.4% on DPP-4 inhibitors, and basal insulin: 14.2%. Incidence of severe hypoglycemias in the last 6 months was 1.9%. The women had worse glycaemic control, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, abdominal obesity, and glomerular filtration levels. CONCLUSIONS: The glycaemic control is worse in women even if adjusted for age and time of onset of diabetes (P=.043), and for the number of hypoglycaemic agents (P=.015). The level of control is also worse in women for dyslipidaemia, abdominal obesity, and glomerular filtration. A preventive strategy promoted from Primary care on healthy lifestyles and controlling all vascular risk factors is essential

Escaso conocimiento entre los profesionales sanitarios sobre las diferencias de género en la asociación entre la diabetes tipo 2 y la enfermedad cardiovascular / Poor awareness among health care professionals about gender differences in the relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease

INTRODUCCIÓN: Varios estudios han identificado un peor control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en el sexo femenino en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2. Una de sus causas podría ser el desconocimiento sobre el perfil de riesgo cardiovascular de la mujer con diabetes tipo 2 por parte de los profesionales. OBJETIVO: Conocer la percepción y el conocimiento de los profesionales de la salud involucrados en el manejo de los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2, del impacto que las diferencias de género tienen en el control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en estos pacientes. MÉTODO: Se envió una encuesta de 24 preguntas relacionadas con el conocimiento y percepción (agrupadas por temas) a profesionales interesados e involucrados en el cuidado de pacientes con diabetes tipo 2. Se analizaron 998 encuestas. Construimos un modelo de ANOVA para comparar los resultados por especialidad y años de experiencia ajustados por el resto de las variables de confusión y regresión logística para estudiar los factores que podían influir en tener más de 12 respuestas adecuadas (resultado favorable). RESULTADOS: La media de respuestas correctas fue 10,3, discretamente mayor para especialistas (rango 10,7-11,8) y aumentaba con la experiencia (p = 0,001). Se encontró el género femenino y los años de experiencia como predictores de tener 12 o más respuestas correctas. CONCLUSIONES: El nivel de conocimientos sobre el tema es bajo, pero similar a los resultados de otros estudios sobre la relación del género con determinadas patologías

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have found poorer control of the cardiovascular risk factors among women with type 2 diabetes. This could be explained by the lack of awareness of their cardiovascular risk among professionals. AIMS: To determine the perception and knowledge of health care professionals involved in diabetes management on the impact of gender difference on the control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A 24-question survey related to knowledge and perceptions (grouped by topics) was sent to professionals who were interested and involved in diabetes care. A total of 998 surveys were analysed. An ANOVA model was constructed to compare the results by specialty and years of experience, as well as adjusting for the rest of the confounding factors. On having more than 12 correct answers (favourable result), a logistic regression was also performed in order to study the factors that could have an influence. RESULTS: The mean number of correct answers was 10.3, and was slightly better for specialists (range 10.7-11.8), and associated with years of experience (P=.001). Female gender and years of experience were identified as predictors of having more than 12 correct answers. CONCLUSIONS: The level of knowledge was low, but similar to the results of the other studies

Control glucémico y de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 con enfermedad cardiovascular en España, y su patrón de tratamiento, en función del género: estudio CODICE / Blood glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease in Spain, and its treatment pattern, according to gender: CODICE study

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Con la implementación de la Estrategia de Promoción de la Salud y Prevención en España, el escenario reflejado en estudios previos de infracontrol de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular (FRCV) en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 (DM2) y enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV) puede haberse modificado, por lo que nos planteamos conocer el grado de control glucémico y de otros FRCV en los pacientes con DM2 y ECV atendidos actualmente en nuestro medio, el patrón de tratamiento antidiabético y las diferencias en función del género. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio epidemiológico, observacional, transversal, de ámbito nacional en pacientes de ambos géneros diagnosticados de DM2 y ECV establecida. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 3.143 pacientes. Edad media: 69,0±10 años. La HbA1c media fue mayor en mujeres que en varones (7,4±1,1% vs. 7,3±1,2%; p < 0,05), así como el colesterol-LDL (101,5±38,1mg/dl vs. 91,1±37,5mg/dl; p < 0,001), la presión arterial sistólica (137,0mmHg vs. 135,6mmHg; p < 0,05) y el índice de masa corporal (30,7±5,4kg/m2 vs. 29,6±4,5kg/m2; p < 0,001). Los tratamientos más utilizados fueron la metformina (68,1%) y/o inhibidores-DPP4 (53,7%), sin diferencias entre géneros. CONCLUSIONES: El grado de control glucémico de los pacientes con DM2 y ECV en España es mejorable. El perfil de tratamiento no se ajusta a las recomendaciones de las guías de práctica clínica en general. Las diferencias en el control de los FRCV son peores en mujeres para lípidos y obesidad

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: With the implementation of the Strategy of Health Promotion and Prevention in Spain, the scenario reflected in previous studies of low control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) can be modified. This study intends to determine the level of blood glucose control and other CVRF in patients with DM2 and CVD currently seen in clinics in Spain, as well as the pattern of antidiabetic treatment, and differences according to gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An epidemiological, observational, cross-sectional, nationwide study was conducted in patients of both genders diagnosed with DM2 and established CVD. RESULTS: The study included 3,143 patients with a mean age 69.0±10 years. The mean HbA1c was 7.4±1.1% in females vs 7.3±1.2% in males (P<.05) and systolic blood pressure was 137±15.0mmHg in females vs 135.6±14.7mmHg in males (P<.05). The mean LDL-cholesterol was 101.5±38.1mg/dl in females vs 91.1±37.5mg/dl in males; P<.001) and the mean body mass index (30.7±5.4kg/m2 in females vs 29.6±4.5kg/m2 in males; P<.001). The most used treatments were metformin (68.1%) and/or DPP4 inhibitors (53.7%), with no differences between genders. CONCLUSIONS: The level of blood glucose control of DM2 patients with CVD in Spain can be improved. The treatment profile does not conform to the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines in general. The differences in the control of CVRF are worse in women for lipids and obesity

Incidence of diabetes mellitus in Spain as results of the nation-wide cohort di@bet.es study.

Our aim was to determine the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a nation-wide population based cohort from Spain (di@bet.es study). The target was the Spanish population. In total 5072 people older than 18 years,were randomly selected from all over Spain). Socio-demographic and clinical data, survey on habits (physical activity and food consumption) and weight, height, waist, hip and blood pressure were recorder. A fasting blood draw and an oral glucose tolerance test were performed. Determinations of serum glucose were made. In the follow-up the same variables were collected and HbA1c was determined. A total of 2408 subjects participated in the follow-up. In total, 154 people developed diabetes (6.4% cumulative incidence in 7.5 years of follow-up). The incidence of diabetes adjusted for the structure of age and sex of the Spanish population was 11.6 cases/1000 person-years (IC95% = 11.1-12.1). The incidence of known diabetes was 3.7 cases/1000 person-years (IC95% = 2.8-4.6). The main risk factors for developing diabetes were the presence of prediabetes in cross-sectional study, age, male sex, obesity, central obesity, increase in weight, and family history of diabetes. This work provides data about population-based incidence rates of diabetes and associated risk factors in a nation-wide cohort of Spanish population.

[Blood glucose control and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease in Spain, and its treatment pattern, according to gender: CODICE study]. / Control glucémico y de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 con enfermedad cardiovascular en España, y su patrón de tratamiento, en función del género: Estudio CODICE.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: With the implementation of the Strategy of Health Promotion and Prevention in Spain, the scenario reflected in previous studies of low control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) can be modified. This study intends to determine the level of blood glucose control and other CVRF in patients with DM2 and CVD currently seen in clinics in Spain, as well as the pattern of antidiabetic treatment, and differences according to gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An epidemiological, observational, cross-sectional, nationwide study was conducted in patients of both genders diagnosed with DM2 and established CVD. RESULTS: The study included 3,143 patients with a mean age 69.0±10 years. The mean HbA1c was 7.4±1.1% in females vs 7.3±1.2% in males (P<.05) and systolic blood pressure was 137±15.0mmHg in females vs 135.6±14.7mmHg in males (P<.05). The mean LDL-cholesterol was 101.5±38.1mg/dl in females vs 91.1±37.5mg/dl in males; P<.001) and the mean body mass index (30.7±5.4kg/m2 in females vs 29.6±4.5kg/m2 in males; P<.001). The most used treatments were metformin (68.1%) and/or DPP4 inhibitors (53.7%), with no differences between genders. CONCLUSIONS: The level of blood glucose control of DM2 patients with CVD in Spain can be improved. The treatment profile does not conform to the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines in general. The differences in the control of CVRF are worse in women for lipids and obesity.

[Poor awareness among health care professionals about gender differences in the relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease]. / Escaso conocimiento entre los profesionales sanitarios sobre las diferencias de género en la asociación entre la diabetes tipo 2 y la enfermedad cardiovascular.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have found poorer control of the cardiovascular risk factors among women with type 2 diabetes. This could be explained by the lack of awareness of their cardiovascular risk among professionals. AIMS: To determine the perception and knowledge of health care professionals involved in diabetes management on the impact of gender difference on the control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A 24-question survey related to knowledge and perceptions (grouped by topics) was sent to professionals who were interested and involved in diabetes care. A total of 998 surveys were analysed. An ANOVA model was constructed to compare the results by specialty and years of experience, as well as adjusting for the rest of the confounding factors. On having more than 12 correct answers (favourable result), a logistic regression was also performed in order to study the factors that could have an influence. RESULTS: The mean number of correct answers was 10.3, and was slightly better for specialists (range 10.7-11.8), and associated with years of experience (P=.001). Female gender and years of experience were identified as predictors of having more than 12 correct answers. CONCLUSIONS: The level of knowledge was low, but similar to the results of the other studies.

miR-10b and miR-223-3p in serum microvesicles signal progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes.

PURPOSE: Type 2 diabetes frequently remains undiagnosed for years, whereas early detection of affected individuals would facilitate the implementation of timely and cost-effective therapies, hence decreasing morbidity. With the intention of identifying novel diagnostic biomarkers, we characterized the miRNA profile of microvesicles isolated from retroactive serum samples of normoglycemic individuals and two groups of subjects with prediabetes that in the following 4 years either progressed to overt diabetes or remained stable. METHODS: We profiled miRNAs in serum microvesicles of a selected group of control and prediabetic individuals participating in the PREDAPS cohort study. Half of the subjects with prediabetes were diagnosed with diabetes during the 4 years of follow-up, while the glycemic status of the other half remained unchanged. RESULTS: We identified two miRNAs, miR-10b and miR-223-3p, which target components of the insulin signaling pathway and whose ratio discriminates between these two subgroups of prediabetic individuals at a stage at which other features, including glycemia, are less proficient at separating them. In global, the profile of miRNAs in microvesicles of prediabetic subjects primed to progress to overt diabetes was more similar to that of diabetic patients than the profile of prediabetic subjects who did not progress. CONCLUSION: We have identified a miRNA signature in serum microvesicles that can be used as a new screening biomarker to identify subjects with prediabetes at high risk of developing diabetes, hence allowing the implementation of earlier, and probably more effective, therapeutic interventions.

[ESCRYTO study. Diabetes without cardiovascular disease and level of control]. / Estudio ESCRYTO. Diabetes sin enfermedad cardiovascular y grado de control.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Diabetes is a significant risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease, which is the main cause of death. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease in Spain. The data used includes the most recent determination of glycosylated haemoglobin, as well as the pattern of antidiabetic treatment, the incidence of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia in the last 6 months, and the level of control of cardiovascular risk factors, and gender. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national, multicentre, and cross-sectional epidemiological study in which 800 doctors associated with the GDPS network participated. RESULTS: Of the total of 1,059 patients, 57% male, with a mean age of 62.7 years in men vs. 65.2 in women (P<.001). The mean onset of diabetes was 9.4±7.5 years. The mean HbA1C was 7.0% in men vs. 7.1% in women (P=.039), with the control objective of <7% being observed in 47.2%. There were 65% patients on treatment with metformin, and 62.4% on DPP-4 inhibitors, and basal insulin: 14.2%. Incidence of severe hypoglycemias in the last 6 months was 1.9%. The women had worse glycaemic control, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, abdominal obesity, and glomerular filtration levels. CONCLUSIONS: The glycaemic control is worse in women even if adjusted for age and time of onset of diabetes (P=.043), and for the number of hypoglycaemic agents (P=.015). The level of control is also worse in women for dyslipidaemia, abdominal obesity, and glomerular filtration. A preventive strategy promoted from Primary care on healthy lifestyles and controlling all vascular risk factors is essential.

Epidemiological multicentre study on the education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Spanish Health Care System. The Forma2 study / Estudio epidemiológico multicéntrico sobre la formación proporcionada a pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en el sistema sanitario español. Estudio Forma2

Purpose. The purpose of the present study was to characterize the education that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receive, and to identify differences as regards the presence of insulin therapy or not. Methods. This crossover, multicentre and descriptive study involved 1066 Spanish physicians who completed a questionnaire on Internet. Results. The physicians that responded had a mean of 26.0 years of experience in healthcare, and mainly worked in a walk-in clinic in an urban area. Physicians rated the level of patient knowledge about their disease on a 5.0 point-scale. Fifty percent of them indicated that they spent between 15 and 30min in educating patients at the time of diagnosis. Previous control with HbA1c>9%, presence of microvascular complications, and a low socio-cultural level, were factors associated with spending more time in education. Conclusion. This is the first study designed to evaluate the education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Spain. The time spent and the individualization of the education are important factors associated with better long-term control of the disease, and thus with the effectiveness of the clinical management (AU)

Objetivo. El objetivo del presente estudio fue caracterizar la educación que reciben los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e identificar las diferencias existentes en función de la presencia o ausencia de terapia insulínica. Métodos. En este estudio transversal, multicéntrico y descriptivo participaron 1.066 médicos españoles que completaron una encuesta por Internet. Resultados. Los médicos participantes tenían una experiencia media de 26 años en atención sanitaria y principalmente trabajaban en centros de atención primaria de áreas urbanas. Los médicos determinaron el grado de conocimiento de cada paciente en relación con su enfermedad empleando una escala de 5 puntos. El 50% de los médicos indicaron que habían empleado entre 15 y 30min en educar al paciente en el momento del diagnóstico. Los niveles de HbA1c>9%, la presencia de complicaciones microvasculares y un nivel sociocultural bajo fueron los factores asociados a la necesidad de dedicar un mayor tiempo a la educación. Conclusión. (AU)Este es el primer estudio diseñado para evaluar la educación proporcionada al paciente con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en España. El tiempo dedicado y la individualización de la educación son factores asociados con un mejor control a largo plazo de la enfermedad y, consecuentemente, con una mayor eficacia en su manejo clínico (AU)

Epidemiological multicentre study on the education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Spanish Health Care System. The Forma2 study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to characterize the education that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receive, and to identify differences as regards the presence of insulin therapy or not. METHODS: This crossover, multicentre and descriptive study involved 1066 Spanish physicians who completed a questionnaire on Internet. RESULTS: The physicians that responded had a mean of 26.0 years of experience in healthcare, and mainly worked in a walk-in clinic in an urban area. Physicians rated the level of patient knowledge about their disease on a 5.0 point-scale. Fifty percent of them indicated that they spent between 15 and 30min in educating patients at the time of diagnosis. Previous control with HbA1c>9%, presence of microvascular complications, and a low socio-cultural level, were factors associated with spending more time in education. CONCLUSION: This is the first study designed to evaluate the education provided to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Spain. The time spent and the individualization of the education are important factors associated with better long-term control of the disease, and thus with the effectiveness of the clinical management.

Inadequate Glycaemic Control and Therapeutic Management of Adults over 65 Years Old with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain.

OBJECTIVES: The glycaemic goals for older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are recommended to avoid an HbA1c levels <7%. The purpose of this study was to analyse the glycaemic control and therapeutic management of older adults (≥65 years) with type 2 DM. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of patients enrolled in three Spanish cross-sectional epidemiological studies. SETTING: The study was conducted between 2009 and 2011 by primary care or specialist physicians. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7,269 patients aged ≥65 years with type 2 DM. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic, medical history, lifestyle habits, biochemical laboratory parameters, comorbidities, type 2 DM complications, and pharmacological treatment data collected from medical records. RESULTS: In total, data from 7,269 patients were analysed (mean age 73.4 years old; 48.4% male). A total of 10.9% of patients had HbA1c levels ≥8.5% and 43.2% <7%. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (82.0%) and dyslipidaemia (76.6%). The microvascular complications were mainly diabetic nephropathy (23.6%) and retinopathy (19.3%). Oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) were taken by 70.5% of patients (sulphonylureas 65.3%), 4.1% were taking insulin alone and 25.4% took both insulin and an OAD. Half of the patients (51.0%) were taking a combination of OADs. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, more than half of older patients with type 2 DM had unsatisfactory management: approximately one in ten had inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥8.5%) despite hypoglycaemic drugs and four in ten were potentially overtreated (HbA1c <7%).

Older type 2 diabetic patients are more likely to achieve glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factors targets than younger patients: analysis of a primary care database.

BACKGROUND: Older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have differential characteristics compared with middle-aged or younger populations, and require tailored management of the disease. AIMS: To evaluate how clinical characteristics, degree of control of glycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of chronic complications and treatments differ between older T2DM patients and younger adults. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using data from a population-based electronic database. We retrieved data from 318,020 patients ≥ 30 years diagnosed with T2DM, attended during 2011 in primary care centres in Catalonia, Spain. We performed descriptive and comparative analyses stratified by gender and age subgroups: ≤ 65, 66-75, 76-85 and >85 years. RESULTS: Both men and women across older age subgroups (> 65 years) had longer diabetes duration than younger adults (8.0 vs. 5.6 in men and 8.4 vs. 6.9 years in women; p < 0.001), but better glycaemic control (mean glycated haemoglobin 7.1 vs. 7.7 in men and 7.1 vs. 7.4 in women; p < 0.001), and better combined control of different cardiovascular risk factors (p < 0.001). Moreover, older patients were more likely to achieve glycaemic targets irrespective of having cardiovascular disease. The use of oral antidiabetics decreased with increasing age, and insulin in monotherapy was more frequently prescribed among patients in the older age subgroups. Diabetes-related complications were more frequent in men of all group ages. In the older age subgroups, patients of both sexes had a longer duration of T2DM but better glycaemic control. In this context, the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy decreased unexpectedly with increasing age. CONCLUSION: Control of glycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors was better among older T2DM patients. There is a need for prospective studies to quantify the weight of risk factors in each complication to adapt the therapeutic and care approaches in elderly people.

[Individualized treatment of diabetic patients in special clinical situations]. / Tratamiento individualizado del paciente diabético en situaciones clínicas especiales.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex disease that is frequently associated with a constellation of risk factors that contribute to worsening morbidity and mortality in affected individuals. To increase quality of life in these persons, both hyperglycemia and other risk factors need to be considered. The first step is probably to establish the glycemic targets for each patient at each stage of the disease. Currently, clinical practice guidelines recommend individualizing glycemic targets with HbA1c values that range from 6-8.5%, depending on the patient's characteristics. Nine different antidiabetic drug families are available, each with distinct characteristics, thus allowing multiple combinations to aid the individual approach to hyperglycemia in each patient at each time point. There are numerous treatment algorithms that aim to simplify and summarize the various therapeutic possibilities. However, with some exceptions, these algorithms do not take into account the individual characteristics of each patient and are excessively general. To select the most appropriate drug for each patient at distinct moments, it is essential to evaluate the patient's comorbidities, such as heart failure, frailty, and the risk of hypoglycemias.

Tratamiento individualizado del paciente diabético en situaciones clínicas especiales / Individualized treatment of diabetic patients in special clinical situations

La diabetes mellitus tipo 2 es una enfermedad compleja, que frecuentemente se asocia a una constelación de factores de riesgo que contribuyen a empeorar la morbimortalidad de la enfermedad. Para conseguir mejorar la calidad de vida de las personas que la padecen es necesario abordar no solo la hiperglucemia, sino también el resto de factores de riesgo. El primer paso probablemente será fijar los objetivos de control deseables para cada paciente en cada momento de la evolución de la enfermedad. Actualmente, las guías de práctica clínica recomiendan individualizar los objetivos de control con valores de la HbA1c que varían entre el 6-8,5% según las características del paciente. Disponemos de 9 familias diferentes de fármacos antidiabéticos con sus características diferenciales, que permiten múltiples posibilidades de combinación para facilitar el abordaje individual de la hiperglucemia en cada paciente y en cada momento. Hay numerosos algoritmos de tratamiento que intentan simplificar y resumir las distintas posibilidades terapéuticas, pero que, salvo excepciones, no tienen en cuenta las características individuales de cada paciente y son excesivamente globalizadores. Deben valorarse de forma preferencial las comorbilidades presentes como la insuficiencia renal, la insuficiencia cardíaca, la fragilidad o el riesgo de hipoglucemias para seleccionar el fármaco más adecuado para cada persona en cada momento (AU)

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex disease that is frequently associated with a constellation of risk factors that contribute to worsening morbidity and mortality in affected individuals. To increase quality of life in these persons, both hyperglycemia and other risk factors need to be considered. The first step is probably to establish the glycemic targets for each patient at each stage of the disease. Currently, clinical practice guidelines recommend individualizing glycemic targets with HbA1c values that range from 6-8.5%, depending on the patient's characteristics. Nine different antidiabetic drug families are available, each with distinct characteristics, thus allowing multiple combinations to aid the individual approach to hyperglycemia in each patient at each time point. There are numerous treatment algorithms that aim to simplify and summarize the various therapeutic possibilities. However, with some exceptions, these algorithms do not take into account the individual characteristics of each patient and are excessively general. To select the most appropriate drug for each patient at distinct moments, it is essential to evaluate the patient's comorbidities, such as heart failure, frailty, and the risk of hypoglycemias (AU)

Barriers associated with poor control in Spanish diabetic patients. A consensus study.

BACKGROUND: Delphi technique allows developing a multidisciplinary consensus to establish solutions. AIM: To identify barriers and solutions to improve control in patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2). METHODS: An observational study using the 2-round Delphi technique (June-August 2011). A panel of 108 experts in DM2 from medical and nursing fields (primary care providers and specialists) from different regions completed via email a questionnaire with 41 Likert statements and 9 scores for each one. Level of agreement was assessed using measures of central tendency and dispersion. We analysed commonalities/differences between the two groups (Kappa index and McNemar chi-square). RESULTS: Response rate: 65%. Degree of agreement: 63.4% (95% CI 48.7-78.1%) in medicine, and 78.1% (95% CI 65.4-90.8) in nursing (p > 0.05). Overall level of agreement: Kappa = 0.43, (χ(2) = 2.5 p > 0.05). Regarding non-compliance with therapy, it improves with: the information to the partner/family/caregiver, patient education degree in diabetes, patient motivation and ability to share and agree on decisions with the patient. Clinical inertia improves with: motivation degree of healthcare professionals and the calculation of cardiovascular risk; and gets worse with: the shortage of time in consultation, absence of data in medical record, border high limits measurements accepted as normal readings, lack of a treatment goals, lack of teamwork (Physician/Nurse), scarcity of resources and lack of alarm systems in the electronic medical record on goals to achieve. CONCLUSION: The participants achieved an agreement in interventions in non-therapeutic compliance and clinical inertia to improve DM2 control.

Fifteen years of continuous improvement of quality care of type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care in Catalonia, Spain.

AIMS: To assess the evolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) quality indicators in primary care centers (PCC) as part of the Group for the Study of Diabetes in Primary Care (GEDAPS) Continuous Quality Improvement (GCQI) programme in Catalonia. METHODS: Sequential cross-sectional studies were performed during 1993-2007. Process and outcome indicators in random samples of patients from each centre were collected. The results of each evaluation were returned to each centre to encourage the implementation of correcting interventions. Sixty-four different educational activities were performed during the study period with the participation of 2041 professionals. RESULTS: Clinical records of 23,501 patients were evaluated. A significant improvement was observed in the determination of some annual process indicators: HbA(1c) (51.7% vs. 88.9%); total cholesterol (75.9% vs. 90.9%); albuminuria screening (33.9% vs. 59.4%) and foot examination (48.9% vs. 64.2%). The intermediate outcome indicators also showed significant improvements: glycemic control [HbA(1c) ≤ 7% (< 57 mmol/mol); (41.5% vs. 64.2%)]; total cholesterol [≤ 200 mg/dl (5.17 mmol/l); (25.5% vs. 65.6%)]; blood pressure [≤ 140/90 mmHg; (45.4% vs. 66.1%)]. In addition, a significant improvement in some final outcome indicators such as prevalence of foot ulcers (7.6% vs. 2.6%); amputations (1.9% vs. 0.6%) and retinopathy (18.8% vs. 8.6%) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although those changes should not be strictly attributed to the GCQI programme, significant improvements in some process indicators, parameters of control and complications were observed in a network of primary care centres in Catalonia.

El control metabólico en pacientes diabéticos inmigrantes / Metabolic control in diabetic immigrants

Objetivo: Valorar el grado de control metabólico y la presencia de complicaciones dela diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) en diabéticos inmigrantes. Material y métodos:Estudio transversal y observacional de casos y controles, apareados por grupos deedad y sexo. Casos: pacientes con DM2 inmigrantes indostanos (n= 116) y no indostanos(n= 113). Controles: pacientes autóctonos con DM2 (n= 229). La relaciónhombre/mujer fue de 6,7, 0,8 y 2, respectivamente. Se valora el control metabólico yla presencia de complicaciones crónicas. Resultados: Los diabéticos inmigrantestienen una media de edad menor (51,9 frente a 60,7 años en pacientes diabéticosnativos), pero un mayor tiempo de evolución de la DM (5,5 frente a 4,4 años). Lospacientes indostanos presentaron signifi cativamente mayores niveles de hemoglobinaglucosilada (del 8 frente al 7,4%). Los pacientes diabéticos inmigrantes presentan unmejor perfi l lipídico (colesterol-LDL de 120,4 frente a 146 mg/dL, y colesterol-HDLde 46,3 frente a 42,5 mg/dL) y tensional (135/79 frente a 141/82 mmHg) que losdiabéticos autóctonos (p <0,001). También tienen menor índice de masa corporal(27,5 frente a 29,3). Los pacientes diabéticos inmigrantes tienen menor frecuencia deneuropatía que los autóctonos (odds ratio [OR] ajustado por edad = 0,22; intervalo deconfi anza [IC] del 95%: 0,11-0,54) y, en el caso de los no indostanos, menos cardiopatíaisquémica (OR= 0,36; IC del 95%: 0,14-0,88). Conclusiones: Los pacientesdiabéticos inmigrantes tienen un perfi l de riesgo metabólico distinto de los autóctonos,entre los que destaca un mal control glucémico, especialmente en los indostanos(AU)

Objective: To assess the degree of metabolic control and the presence oftype 2 diabetes complications in diabetic immigrants. Methods: Cross-sectionalcase-control observational study, matched by age and sex. Cases: Hindustanidiabetic immigrants (n= 116) and non-hindustani (n= 113). Controls:native diabetic patients with type 2 diabetes (n= 229). The relation male/femalewas 6.7, 0.8 y 2, respectively. Metabolic control and presence of chroniccomplications were assessed. Results: Compared to native diabetics, immigrantdiabetics had a lower average age (51.9 vs. 60.7 years), with longerdiabetes duration (5.5 vs. 4.4 years). Hindustani immigrants presented statisticallysignificant higher HbA1c figures (8 vs. 7.4%). In general, diabetic immigrantspresented a better lipid profile (LDL 120.4 vs. 146 and HDL 46.3 vs.42.5 mg/dL) and better blood pressure figures (135/79 vs. 141/82 mmHg)than native diabetics (p <0.001). As well, immigrants had lower BMI (27.5 vs.29.3). Considering age-adjusted complications, immigrant diabetics had fewerneuropathy than native (OR= 0.22; IC: 0.11-0.54) and considering non-hindustanidiabetics, fewer coronary heart disease (OR= 0.36; IC: 0.14-0.88).Conclusions: Immigrant diabetics have a different metabolic risk profile comparedto native diabetics, with poor glycaemic control, especially among hindustaniimmigrants(AU)

[Correlation between the various measurements of obesity and the degree of resistance to insulin]. / Correlación entre las diferentes medidas de obesidad y el grado de resistencia a la insulina.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the correlation between certain obesity measurements and insulin resistance (measured by HOMA). DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. SETTING: Urban health centre with elderly population. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 70 people was chosen from among an adult population with risk factors for DM2 or already diagnosed. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Parameters of obesity were collected (weight, BMI, body perimeters, waist/hip index, and cutaneous folds), as were clinical parameters (blood pressure and cardiovascular risk), and analyses (glycaemia and insulinaemia--both basal and after 2 hours of oral overload of glucose--, HOMA, lipid profile, and microalbuminuria study). Resistance to insulin (IR) was defined as a HOMA > or =3.8. RESULTS: Individuals with IR had significantly higher values of weight (85.5 vs 75.5 kg), BMI (35.1 vs 29.4 kg/m2), waist perimeter (108 vs 100.3 cm) than those without IR. In neither group were any significant differences as to the waist/hip index found. The BMI and/or waist perimeter values that were more likely to suffer IR were established. In men, the values were waist >107 cm (sensitivity, 43%; specificity, 62%) and BMI>29 (sensitivity, 57%; specificity, 50%). In women, they were a waist >102 cm (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 89%) and BMI>34 (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 89%). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice the BMI and the diameter of the waist are very good predictors of IR, whilst the waist/hip index and cutaneous folds do not provide any information of value.