The impact of diet liberalization on bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background and study aims Dietary restrictions are integral to colonoscopy preparation and impact patient satisfaction. Utilizing split-dose, lower-volume polyethylene glycol 3350-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS), this study compared colon preparation adequacy of a low-residue diet to clear liquids using a validated grading scale. Patients and methods This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, single-center non-inferiority study evaluating diet the day prior to outpatient colonoscopy. Subjects were randomized to a Low-Residue diet for breakfast and lunch, or Clears only. All subjects received split dose PEG-ELS. The primary endpoint was preparation adequacy using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), with adequate defined as a score > 5. Secondary endpoints included mean BBPS scores for the entire colon and individual segments, satisfaction, adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates, and impact on sleep and daily activities. Results Final analysis included 140 subjects, 72 assigned to Clears and 68 to Low-Residue. The Low-Residue diet was non-inferior to Clears (risk difference = - 5.08 %, P = 0.04) after adjusting for age. Mean colon cleansing scores were not significantly different overall and for individual colonic segments. Satisfaction with the Low-Residue diet was significantly greater (P = 0.01). The adenoma detection rate was not statistically significantly different between study groups, but the number of adenomas detected was significantly greater with Clears (P = 0.01). Adverse events and impact on sleep and activities did not differ significantly between diet arms. Conclusions A low-residue diet for breakfast and lunch the day prior to colonoscopy was non-inferior to clear liquids alone for achieving adequate colon cleansing when using split dose PEG-ELS.

Clinical outcomes in patients with bile leaks treated via ERCP with regard to the timing of ERCP: a large multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postsurgical or traumatic bile duct leaks (BDLs) can be safely and effectively managed by endoscopic therapy via ERCP. The early diagnosis of BDL is important because unrecognized leaks can lead to serious adverse events (AEs). Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between timing of endotherapy after BDL and the clinical outcomes, AEs, and long-term results of endoscopic therapy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study on patients with BDLs who underwent ERCP between 2006 and 2014. Data were assembled on patient demographics, etiology of BDL, and procedural details. Endotherapy for BDLs were classified a priori into 3 groups based on timing of ERCP from time of biliary injury: within 1 day of BDL, on day 2 or 3 after BDL, and greater than 3 days after BDL. The relationship among timing of ERCP after BDL injury and outcomes, procedure-related AEs, and patient AEs and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: From February 2006 to June 2014, 518 patients (50% male; mean age, 51.7 years) underwent ERCP for therapy of BDLs. The etiology of the BDL was laparoscopic cholecystectomy (70.7%), post-liver transplantation (11.2%), liver resection (14.1%), trauma (2.5%), and other causes (1.5%). Endotherapy was performed by placing a transpapillary stent alone (73.5%) or with a sphincterotomy (26.5%). The timing of ERCPs was as follows: ≤1 day = 57 patients, day 2 or 3 = 140 patients, and >3 days = 321 patients. There was no statistical difference in patient demographics, etiology/site of BDL, or type of endotherapy performed among the 3 groups. On multivariate analysis there was no statistically significant difference in BDL success rate for ERCPs performed within 1 day compared with those performed on day 2 or 3 or after 3 days of bile duct injury (91.2%, 90%, and 88.5%, respectively; P = .77). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the overall patient AE rate among the 3 groups (21.1%, 22.9%, and 24.6%, respectively; P = .81). AEs in men occurred significantly more frequently when compared with women, even after adjusting for age, BDL etiology, and location of leak (27.6% vs 19.9%; OR, 1.53; P = .04). Patients whose BDL was due to a cholecystectomy had a lower AE and mortality rate compared with those who had biliary injury from other etiologies (OR, .42; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rates and AEs after ERCP were not dependent on the timing of the procedure relative to the discovery of the bile leak. This suggests that ERCP in these patients can usually be performed in an elective, rather than an urgent, manner.

Diagnostic accuracy of directed cholangioscopic biopsies and confocal laser endomicroscopy in cytology-negative indeterminate bile duct stricture: a multicenter comparison trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the operating characteristics of using the confocal endomicroscopy miniprobe (pCLE) compared to cholangioscopic targeted biopsies for the detection of malignancy in biliary tract strictures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures after inconclusive brush cytology. Only those patients with a final pathologic diagnosis or a conclusive >12 months follow-up were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent pCLE assessment (pCLE) and those who underwent cholangioscopic targeted biopsies (SB) of biliary strictures. Cholangioscopic biopsies were considered positive for malignancy when adenocarcinoma cells were identified. pCLE was considered positive for malignancy according to the Miami and Paris criteria. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients (median age, 66 years; 54.9% male) were included; 61 underwent C-pCLE and 134 underwent SB. Patient and biliary stricture characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Final diagnoses were cholangiocarcinoma (N.=93), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (N.=6); and benign strictures (N.=96). The overall sensitivity of pCLE and SB for the detection of malignancy were 76.4% and 78.4% respectively (P=0.7). Similarly, there was no difference in the specificity of pCLE and CB for the diagnosis of malignancy (97.7% and 98.5% respectively; P=1). The diagnostic accuracy of pCLE was 83.6% versus 88.8% in SB (P=0.8). However, the specificity to detect a malignancy was higher for CB compared to pCLE (98.5 vs. 86.3%; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures, cytology combined with pCLE has a similar sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy when compared to cholangioscopic biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant strictures. pCLE may be beneficial for in vivo, real-time histopathologic examination of biliary strictures and help in the instantaneous characterization of biliary strictures.

Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP in patients with cirrhosis: a large multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with cirrhosis may be less than optimal candidates for ERCP because of underlying ascites, coagulopathy, encephalopathy, and other problems. Although the risks of surgery in patients with cirrhosis are well known, few data are available regarding ERCP in patients with cirrhosis. We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of ERCP in patients with cirrhosis to evaluate outcomes, efficacy, and safety. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study. RESULTS: A total of 538 ERCP procedures were performed on 328 patients with cirrhosis. A total of 229 patients had Child-Pugh (CP) class A, 229 patients had CP class B, and 80 patients had CP class C. Thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy were corrected before ERCP. The 30-day, procedure-related adverse events included post-ERCP pancreatitis (n = 25, 4.6%: 21 mild, 3 moderate, 1 severe), hemorrhage (n = 6, 1.1%), cholangitis (n = 15, 2.8%), perforation (n = 2, 0.4%), aspiration pneumonia (n = 5, 0.9%), bile leakage (n = 1, 0.2%), cholecystitis (n = 1, 0.2%), and death (n = 1, 0.2%). There was a higher incidence of adverse events in patients with CP class B and C disease when compared with those with CP class A disease (11.4%, 11.3%, and 6.1%, respectively; P = .048). There was no correlation between the risk of significant hemorrhage and the presence of coagulopathy or CP class, even in those who underwent a sphincterotomy. The presence of poorly controlled encephalopathy correlated with a higher overall adverse event rate (P = .003). Sub-analysis revealed that patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis had a significantly higher overall rate of adverse events, pancreatitis, bleeding, and cardiopulmonary adverse events after ERCP when compared with those with primary sclerosing cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study was performed on a large series of patients with cirrhosis undergoing ERCP. Overall, the adverse events seen in patients with cirrhosis are similar to those seen in the general population of patients undergoing ERCP, although patients with CP classes B and C have higher adverse event rates compared with those with CP class A. Patients with cirrhosis without primary sclerosing cholangitis had significantly greater adverse event rates when compared with patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

GOAL: To determine whether Excellent bowel cleansing is superior to Good for the detection of adenomas. BACKGROUND: High quality colonoscopy requires Adequate bowel preparation. However, it is unknown whether adenoma detection differs between subcategories of Adequate cleansing. STUDY: We utilized a retrospective, cross-sectional study design to obtain data about patients undergoing colonoscopy at a single university center between August 31, 2011 and September 1, 2012. Primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR), the percentage of patients with ≥1 adenoma. Secondary outcomes included adenomas per colonoscopy, adenoma distribution (proximal vs. distal), and detection of advanced adenomas, sessile serrated polyps (SSP), and cancer. RESULTS: The electronic medical record of 5113 consecutive colonoscopies with Good or Excellent preparation was queried for preparation quality, colonoscopy indication, demographics, medical history, and history of adenoma and colon cancer. Exclusion criteria were age below 18 years, inflammatory bowel disease, or familial polyposis. Adenoma detection was not superior with Excellent cleansing as compared with Good for ADR [respectively, 26% vs. 29%, odds ratio 0.97 (0.85, 1.11), P=0.618] or adenomas per colonoscopy [respectively, 0.437 vs. 0.499, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.98 (0.90, 1.07), P=0.705]. Excellent cleansing demonstrated superior detection of SSPs [IRR 1.66 (1.14, 2.40), P=0.008] and advanced adenomas [IRR 1.37 (1.09, 1.72), P=0.007] but not colon cancer [odds ratio 0.286 (0.083, 0.985), P=0.0474]. CONCLUSIONS: ADR is not significantly different between the Adequate subcategories of Excellent and Good. However, Excellent cleansing is associated with superior detection of advanced adenomas and SSPs. If confirmed, achieving an Excellent preparation may improve colonoscopy performance in the proximal colon where SSPs primarily occur.