Clinical Characteristics and Sensitization Profile of Patients Allergic to Cow Epithelium.

INTRODUCTION: Cow epithelium allergy (CEA) has been described in workers highly exposed to cattle, such as farmers and veterinarians, being a health problem in this population since it is their main livelihood. This study aimed to characterize the main clinical manifestations and define the sensitization profile of the cow epithelium-allergic population treated in our health area. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including a total of 34 patients with a clinical diagnosis of CEA, confirmed by skin tests, bovine epithelium-specific IgE levels and allergen-specific conjunctival challenge test in some cases. They were distributed by age, sex, profession, clinical symptoms, specific IgE levels to other mammalian epithelia, pollens, mites, and foods. Immunoblotting was performed with extracts from cow dander, cow body fluids (urine and saliva), bull urine, and 17 sera from immunotherapy-untreated CEA patients. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 44 years, with a higher incidence in cattle farmers. Rhinoconjunctivitis occurred in 100% of cases, with 35% having monosensitization to cow epithelium. Sera from most patients detected a 20-kDa IgE-binding band in cow dander, cow saliva, cow urine, and bull urine, corresponding to the major allergen Bos d 2 (bovine lipocalin). In 70% of the patients, a 25-kDa band was detected in cow and bull urine extracts, whose identification by mass spectrometry and investigation with protein databases led to the identification of a Bos taurus lipocalin (UniProt protein ID: A0A3Q1LGU7_BOVIN). CONCLUSION: CEA should be considered in patients exposed to cattle and as a cause of occupational disease. The IgE immunodetection revealed sensitization to a protein present in cow and bull urine (odorant-binding protein) not previously described.

Seafood hypersensitivity in mite sensitized individuals: is tropomyosin the only responsible allergen?

BACKGROUND: Seafood allergy has been related to mite sensitization, mainly mediated by the muscle protein tropomyosin. OBJECTIVES: To determine the correlation between seafood hypersensitivity and mite sensitization (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Chortoglyphus arcuatus, a highly prevalent storage mite in Spain) and to investigate the implication of tropomyosin in cross-reactivity. METHODS: Patients from Northwest Spain were divided into 2 groups. The mite-seafood group contained 30 allergic mite individuals with a clinical history of food hypersensitivity. The mite group contained 40 individuals with positive skin prick test results to D pteronyssinus and C arcuatus but negative seafood test results. Specific IgE (sIgE) to whole mite and shrimp extracts, mite tropomyosin (rDer p 10), and shrimp tropomyosin (rPen a 1) were determined in each serum sample. Allergenic profiles were analyzed by immunoblot. Cross-reactivity studies were investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot inhibition studies. RESULTS: In the mite-seafood group, 71% of patients had positive sIgE results to shrimp and 55% of them to shrimp tropomyosin. A strong correlation was found between sIgE to shrimp tropomyosin and mite tropomyosin. Positive correlation was observed between sIgE to shrimp tropomyosin and severity of symptoms. In the mite group, none of the 20% of patients with sIgE to shrimp tested positive to shrimp tropomyosin. In the immunoblot inhibition experiment, the shrimp extract was totally inhibited by mite extract. These data suggest that primary sensitization is related to mite sensitization. CONCLUSION: Tropomyosin does not seem to be the main allergen involved in mite-seafood sensitization in mite sensitized individuals. High levels of sIgE to tropomyosin seem to be related to severity of symptoms.

[Relationship between comorbidity and asthma control]. / Relación entre presencia de comorbilidad y control del asma.

INTRODUCTION: The coexistence of potentially aggravating processes is common in asthmatics, particularly in patients with difficult control. The primary aim of this study is to ascertain whether comorbidity id more common in uncontrolled patients. As a secondary aim, we propose to evaluate the correlation between the asthma control test (ACT) and the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO). PATIENT AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study comparing the function and clinical picture of two groups of asthmatics: controlled (ACT≥20) and uncontrolled (ACT<20). They were all assessed for, smoking, rhinosinusitis, obesity, anxiety, depression, vocal cord dysfunction, gastro-oesophageal reflux (GORD), allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), COPD and nasal polyps. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients with controlled asthma and 102 with suboptimal control were included. The patients with an ACT≥20 had better lung function, less variation in PEF, less bronchial hyper-reactivity and lower FENO values. Comorbidities were found in 95% of the controlled asthmatics and in 97% of the uncontrolled. Only the presence of nasal polyps, GORD and ABPA was more frequent in the uncontrolled group. However, the simultaneous presence of 3 or more comorbidity factors was significantly more frequent in patients with sub-optimal control (P=0.01). There was no significant correlation between the FENO and the ACT values (rho=-0.08; P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Aggravating comorbidities are more common in patients with sub-optimal control. There was no correlation between the FENO and the ACT values.