Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Knee Surg ; 2024 May 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677294

RESUMO

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a challenging surgery occurring in 3 to 24% of primary reconstructions. A meticulous planning to study the precise size and location of both femoral and tibial bone tunnels is mandatory. The aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and interoperator differences in the decision-making process between experienced surgeons after they were asked to make preoperative planning for ACL revision reconstruction with the use of both the computed tomography (CT) scan and a three-dimensional (3D)-printed model of the knee. Data collected from 23 consecutive patients undergoing revision of ACLR for graft failure at a single institute between September 2018 and February 2020 were prospectively reviewed. The double-blinded collected data were presented to three board-certificate attending surgeons. Surgeons were asked to decide whether to perform one-stage or two-stage revision ACLR based on the evaluation of the CT scan images and the 3D-printed custom-made models at two different rounds, T0 and T1, respectively, 7 days apart one from the other. Interoperator consensus following technical mistake was 52% at T0 and 56% at T1 using the CT scans, meanwhile concordance was 95% at T0 and 94% at T1 using the 3D models. Concordance between surgeons following new knee injury was 66% at T0 and 70% at T1 using CT scans, while concordance was 96% both at T0 and T1 using 3D models. Intraoperative variability using 3D models was extremely low: concordance at T0 and T1 was 98%. McNemar test showed a statistical significance in the use of 3D model for preoperative planning (p < 0.005). 3D-printed model reliability resulted to be higher compared with CT as intraoperator surgery technique selection was not modified throughout time from T0 to T1 (p < 0.005). The use of 3D-printed models had the most impact when evaluating femoral and tibial tunnels, resulting to be a useful instrument during preoperative planning of revision ACLR between attending surgeons with medium-high workflow.

2.
Arthrosc Tech ; 12(11): e2093-e2098, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38094942

RESUMO

Posterior cruciate ligament ruptures account for nearly 20% of knee ligament lesions. These may be either isolated or occur as part of multiligament injuries. In most of the cases, conservative treatment is recommended, but when operative treatment is required, this is technically demanding. Several posterior cruciate ligament reconstructive techniques have been described, but some concerns still remain regarding graft choice, tunnels position, visualization of the posterior compartment and graft fixation. We describe an arthroscopic all-inside technique using a single-bundle autologous quadriceps tendon with patellar bone block.

3.
Oral Oncol ; 112: 105073, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33160150

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of REPLICA, a CAD/CAM-designed patient-specific titanium mandible, in patients with mandibular defects not suitable for reconstruction with traditional techniques. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cohort study with a composite primary outcome assigned at the end of a 1-year follow-up. The outcome was assigned in the presence of all the following: 1) absence of intraoral or skin extrusion of REPLICA; 2) decrease or cessation of oral pain; 3) stability or increase in mouth opening; 4) resumption of oral feeding without the need of nasogastric tube; 5) absence of fracture at multidetector computer tomography (MDCT); 6) absence of displacement (MDCT); 7) absence of screw loosening (MDCT). The secondary outcome was the patient-reported QOL at 6 months of follow-up as detected by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. RESULTS: Between March 2012 and June 2017, 18 consecutive patients, with a median (IQR) age of 67 (65;74) underwent reconstruction of mandibular defects with REPLICA at our Unit. The primary outcome was reached by 14 of the 18 patients. QOL data were available for 15 patients at the 6-month follow-up, showing a good profile of general and disease-specific QOL. CONCLUSION: REPLICA offered a safe solution at 1-year for the treatment of mandibular defects not suitable for reconstruction with traditional techniques, and was associated with subjective well-being and satisfaction. Further studies are needed to assess the full range of indications of REPLICA.


Assuntos
Desenho Assistido por Computador , Mandíbula , Reconstrução Mandibular/métodos , Desenho de Prótese/métodos , Titânio , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Contraindicações de Procedimentos , Ingestão de Alimentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas Mandibulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Mandibulares/cirurgia , Reconstrução Mandibular/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Boca/terapia , Manejo da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...