Amelogenin in calcified matrices of odontogenic cysts and odontogenic tumors: An immunohistochemical study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There are few studies comparing the expression of enamel proteins, such as amelogenin, and cytokeratins in cyst and odontogenic tumors like in ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst, indicating that amelogenin could be a potential biomarker for the aggressiveness in the odontogenic tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the expression of amelogenin, cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (CKAE1/AE3) and cytokeratin 14 (CK14) in cysts and odontogenic tumors with calcified matrices such as calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), compound (CdO) and complex (CxO) odontomas, adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT) and calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CEOT) as an aggressiveness indicator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three COC, eight CxO, three CdO, twelve AOT, two CEOT and three dental germs were submitted to an immunohistochemistry panel of antibodies composed of amelogenin, CKAE1/AE3 and CK14. RESULTS: CKAE1/AE3 and CK14 was present in all odontogenic epithelia. The amelogenin protein was detected in prismatic and amorphous calcified matrices of epithelial origin belonging to CxO, CdO, AOT, COC and the tooth germs used as controls. On the other hand, the CEOT was the only tumor or cyst studied that did not present immunostaining for amelogenin in calcified matrices. CONCLUSION: Amelogenin was detected in pathologies with a low or absent recurrence rate and excellent prognosis. CEOT was the lesion of greater clinical aggressiveness which did not express amelogenin. The presence of amelogenin in calcified matrices of odontogenic arise could be an indicator of low aggressiveness.

Evaluation of keratinization and AgNORs count in exfoliative cytology of normal oral mucosa from smokers and non-smokers.

OBJECTIVE: In smokers with clinically normal buccal mucosa,cytological changes such as increased keratinization, and higher nucleolar activity have been observed. In these studies the cells for cytological smears were obtained with a wooden spatula. Our objectives were to evaluate the depth of cytological smears of oral mucosa obtained with both a brush (endobrush) and a wooden spatula, and to compare the degree of keratinization and the nucleolar activity in smokers and non-smokers. DESIGN: We obtained cytological smears of clinically normal lateral tongues of 30 smokers and 30 non-smokers using both a wooden spatula and endobrush. The samples were dyed with Papanicolaou and the AgNORs. RESULTS: With the wooden spatula we found a greater percentage of enucleated superficial epithelial cells (P = 0.016) and deeper cells were obtained with an endobrush (intermediate cells) (P = 0.035). The smokers showed a greater percentage of enucleated superficial cells with both techniques, however this difference was significantly greater with Endobrush (P = 0.005). The average of AgNORs in the nucleated cells was greater in smokers(3.83) than in non-smokers (2.79) (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The Endobrush allows the clinician to obtain deeper cells of buccal mucosa. Smokers with clinically normal mucosa show a greater percentage of keratinized cells and a greater nucleolar activity, suggesting that cigarette smoking influences the cellular activity of the mucosa of the lateral tongue.