Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 51, 2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684547

RESUMO

Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic affection that may lead to major surgeries, such as colorectal resections. Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) are among the possible complications. When they occur, it is necessary to adapt the repair surgery as best as possible to limit their functional consequences. This video shows three different techniques for correcting RVF after rectal resection for endometriosis, with a combination of perineal surgery and laparoscopy: a mucosal flap, a transanal transection and single stapled anastomosis (TTSS) and a pull through. Supplementary file1 (MP4 469658 KB).


Assuntos
Endometriose , Laparoscopia , Fístula Retovaginal , Humanos , Feminino , Fístula Retovaginal/cirurgia , Fístula Retovaginal/etiologia , Endometriose/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Protectomia/métodos , Reto/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Períneo/cirurgia , Adulto
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(11): 1545-1552, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32463973

RESUMO

AIM: Restorative total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer after high-dose pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer has been reported to provide an unacceptable rate of pelvic sepsis. In a previous publication we proposed that delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) should be performed in this situation. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of this strategy. METHOD: Between 2000 and 2018, 1094 men were operated on for rectal cancer in our institution. All men with T2/T3 mid and low rectal cancer with preoperative radiotherapy and restorative TME were considered for this study (n = 416). Patients with external-beam high-dose radiotherapy (EBHRT) for prostate cancer (70-78 Gy) were identified and compared with patients with conventional long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by TME. We compared our already published historical cohort (2000-2012), including arm A (CRT + TME; n = 236) and arm B (EBHRT + TME; n = 12), with our early cohort (2013-2018), including arm C (CRT + TME; n = 158) and arm D (EBHRT + TME-DCAA; n = 10). The end-points were morbidity, pelvic sepsis, reoperation rate and quality of the specimen. RESULTS: Overall morbidity was not significantly different between groups. Pelvic sepsis decreased from 50% (arm B) to 10% (arm D) with the use of DCAA (P = 0.074), and was similar between arms A, C and D. Quality of the specimen was not significantly different between the four groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that TME with DCAA in patients with previous EBHRT is feasible, with the same postoperative pelvic sepsis rate as conventional CRT.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Neoplasias da Próstata , Neoplasias Retais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Trials ; 21(1): 216, 2020 Feb 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32087762

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy, by its minimally invasive nature, has revolutionized digestive and particularly colorectal surgery by decreasing post-operative pain, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. In this trial, we aim to assess whether low pressure in laparoscopic colonic surgery (7 mm Hg instead of 12 mm Hg) could further reduce pain, analgesic consumption, and morbidity, resulting in a shorter hospital stay. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PAROS trial is a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. We aim to recruit 138 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a low-pressure group (7 mm Hg) or a standard-pressure group (12 mm Hg). The primary outcome will be a comparison of length of hospital stay between the two groups. Secondary outcomes will compare post-operative pain, consumption of analgesics, morbidity within 30 days, technical and oncological quality of the surgical procedure, time to passage of flatus and stool, and ambulation. All adverse events will be recorded. Analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research received the approval from the Committee for the Protection of Persons and was the subject of information to the ANSM. This search is saved in the ID-RCB database under registration number 2018-A03028-47. This research is retrospectively registered January 23, 2019, at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ed under the name "LaPAroscopic Low pRessure cOlorectal Surgery (PAROS)". This trial is ongoing.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Pneumoperitônio Artificial/métodos , Reto/cirurgia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Colo/fisiopatologia , Método Duplo-Cego , França , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Pneumoperitônio Artificial/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Pressão , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Reto/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...