A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Design Thorough QT Study With a Nested Crossover to Compare the Cardiac Safety of Amiselimod With Placebo and Positive Control in Healthy Volunteers.

This double-blind study evaluated the cardiac safety of amiselimod. Healthy adults (n = 190) were randomized (2:1:1) to receive (1) oral placebo (day -1), followed by oral amiselimod (days 1-26), which was upwardly titrated from 0.4 to 1.6 mg once daily to achieve steady-state concentrations comparable with 0.4 (therapeutic) and 0.8 mg (supratherapeutic) once daily, and placebo (day 27); (2) placebo (day -1), oral moxifloxacin 400 mg (day 1; positive control), followed by placebo (days 1-27); or (3) placebo (days -1 to 26), followed by moxifloxacin 400 mg (day 27). No participant had a corrected QT interval by Fredericia (QTcF) >500 milliseconds or a change from baseline (dQTcF) >60 milliseconds. The upper limits of the 90%CIs for the differences in least-squares mean difference in dQTcF between amiselimod and placebo on days 13 and 26 were <10 milliseconds. Area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 23.5 hours after dosing and maximum plasma concentration of amiselimod and amiselimod-P (active metabolite) at steady-state concentrations for the 0.8-mg dose on day 26 were approximately double that observed with the 0.4-mg dose on day 13. All adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, and no deaths occurred. Amiselimod did not have any clinically relevant effect on the QTcF interval.

The Effect of Acid Suppression Therapy on the Safety and Efficacy of Plecanatide: Analysis of Randomized Phase III Trials.

PURPOSE: Plecanatide, an approved therapy for chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, is an analogue of uroguanylin that replicates its pH-sensitive activity and binds to guanylate cyclase-C receptors expressed on intestinal epithelium, stimulating fluid secretion. This analysis explores concomitant acid suppression therapy's effect on the efficacy and safety of plecanatide in adults with CIC. METHODS: Data from 2 placebo-controlled, 12-week Phase III trials of plecanatide in CIC were pooled. Patients were randomized to receive placebo, plecanatide 3 mg, or plecanatide 6 mg. The primary endpoint was the durable, overall complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) response rate (defined as ≥3 CSBMs in a given week and ≥1 CSBM increase from baseline within a week for ≥9 of 12 weeks, including ≥3 of the last 4 treatment weeks). Safety was also evaluated. Results were stratified by concomitant use or nonuse of acid suppression therapy. FINDINGS: Of the pooled intent-to-treat population, 338 of 2639 patients (12.8%) received concomitant acid suppression medication. Efficacy response rates in patients using acid suppressors were 23.6% with plecanatide 3 mg (P = 0.001 vs placebo), 22.1% with plecanatide 6 mg (P = 0.002), and 7.6% with placebo. Responses were similar in patients not using acid suppressors: 20.4% (plecanatide 3 mg, P < 0.001), 19.6% (plecanatide 6 mg, P < 0.001), and 12.1% (placebo). Serious adverse events were experienced by 3.3% of patients who used concomitant acid suppression and 1.0% of those who did not. IMPLICATIONS: Plecanatide treatment is safe and efficacious for patients with CIC when administered with concomitant acid suppression medication. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifiers: NCT02122471 and NCT01982240.

An Open-label, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Probiotic Blend in Patients With Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms.

GOAL: A novel 5-strain (Bl-04, Bi-07, HN019, NCFM, and Lpc-37) probiotic blend was developed and its safety and efficacy were evaluated in patients with functional gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. BACKGROUND: These strains administered together have not previously been investigated. STUDY: Patients aged 18 to 75 years with functional GI symptoms were eligible for inclusion in a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study (NCT04155801). An oral capsule containing the novel probiotic blend was administered once daily for 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was patient-reported improvement in overall GI well-being at day 30. Secondary efficacy endpoints included changes in GI symptoms assessed using the GI Health Symptom Questionnaire. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was recorded at all visits. RESULTS: Of 188 enrolled patients, 72.3% were female and mean (SD) age was 44.1 (13.4) years. At day 30, 85.1% of patients achieved the primary endpoint, a positive response signifying improvement in overall GI well-being. Improvements from baseline were reported at day 30 in diarrhea frequency (baseline frequency≥3 to 4 d/wk) and severity (baseline severity≥5/10) for 75.8% and 87.3% of patients, respectively. Over the same time period, constipation frequency (baseline frequency≥3 to 4 d/wk) and severity (baseline severity≥5/10) improved in 73.6% and 80.4% of patients, respectively. Most patients reported improvements at day 30 in frequency and severity of straining, urgency, abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, and distention. Improvements reported at day 30 were generally observable at day 14. No safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: A novel 5-strain probiotic blend improved functional GI symptoms and was safe.

P029 Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Amiselimod, a Selective Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator, in Healthy Subjects: Results From a Phase 1 Study.

BACKGROUND: Amiselimod is a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator in development for inflammatory bowel disease. It is converted to its active metabolite, amiselimod phosphate (amiselimod-P), and has a long half-life and slow accumulation to steady state. We evaluated a multiple-dose titration regimen to determine the plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of amiselimod and amiselimod-P at steady state for the 0.4 mg QD therapeutic dose on day 13 and for the 0.8 mg QD supratherapeutic dose on day 26. We also investigated the pharmacodynamic (PD) effect of amiselimod on absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled, parallel study with a nested crossover design assessed amiselimod and amiselimod-P. Healthy adults received a single dose of placebo followed by oral amiselimod, which was upwardly titrated in doses ranging from 0.4 to 1.6 mg QD to rapidly achieve steady-state concentrations for the 0.4 mg QD and 0.8 mg QD doses within a 28-day treatment period. The PK parameters of amiselimod and amiselimod-P (on days 1, 13 and 26) included the geometric mean (geometric coefficient of variation percentage [CV%]) maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), median (minimum, maximum) time to Cmax (Tmax), geometric mean (geometric CV%) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and geometric mean (geometric CV%) AUC from time 0 to 23.5 hours post dose (AUC0-23.5). Multidose PD were evaluated by changes in ALCs. RESULTS: The PK population included 95 amiselimod-treated participants and the PD population included 190 participants who received amiselimod or placebo. On day 13, the steady-state AUC and Cmax for amiselimod 0.4 mg QD increased by 10-fold for amiselimod and by 4-fold for amiselimod-P compared with day 1. On day 26, the steady-state AUC0-23.5 and Cmax for amiselimod 0.8 mg QD increased by 1.9-fold for amiselimod and by 1.8-fold for amiselimod-P compared with day 13. The median Tmax of plasma amiselimod and amiselimod-P were similar on all 3 days and were reached at 11 to 12 hours post dose for amiselimod and at 10 hours post dose for amiselimod-P. The mean ALCs for amiselimod exhibited a gradual decrease from pre-dose (1.681 × 103/uL) to a nadir of 0.424 × 103/uL on day 27. CONCLUSION: The abbreviated amiselimod dosing titration regimen reached steady state within 14 days for the therapeutic 0.4 mg QD regimen and within 26 days for the supratherapeutic 0.8 mg QD regimen; expected decreases in ALCs were observed following amiselimod.

Evaluation of Plecanatide for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation in Patients 65 Years or Older.

PURPOSE: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) are common functional gastrointestinal disorders. The prevalence of constipation-related issues tends to increase with age. This analysis pooled data from Phase III trials in CIC and IBS-C to assess the safety and efficacy of plecanatide in patients aged ≥65 years. METHODS: Patients randomized to receive plecanatide (3 or 6 mg) or placebo from two CIC and two IBS-C trials were pooled. Efficacy end points common to all trials included changes in stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale), changes in weekly frequency of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) and spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), and time to first CSBM and SBM. Efficacy and safety profile results are reported per age group (≥65 and <65 years of age). FINDINGS: The pooled intention-to-treat population comprised 451 patients aged ≥65 years (mean age, 70 years) and 4364 patients aged <65 years (mean age, 41.9 years), of whom 287 and 2914, respectively, were randomized to receive plecanatide. Compared with placebo, plecanatide produced statistically significant improvements in stool consistency from baseline at week 12 (both age groups), CSBM and SBM frequency from baseline at week 12 (plecanatide 3 mg group aged ≥65 years and both plecanatide groups aged <65 years), and time from start of therapy to first CSBM (both age groups) and SBM (plecanatide 6 mg group aged ≥65 years and both plecanatide groups aged <65 years). No new safety issues were observed. IMPLICATIONS: Plecanatide is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for patients aged ≥65 years with CIC or IBS-C. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT01982240, NCT02122471, NCT02387359, and NCT02493452.

Identifying factors associated with clinical success in patients treated with NASHA(®)/Dx injection for fecal incontinence.

PURPOSE: Injection with the bulking agent consisting of non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (NASHA(®)/Dx) is well tolerated and efficacious for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI); however, the patient population that may derive maximum benefit has not been established. This post hoc responder analysis assessed demographic and baseline characteristics predictive of responsiveness to NASHA/Dx treatment. METHODS: Adults with a Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence score (CCFIS) ≥10 were randomized to receive NASHA/Dx or sham treatment. The primary end point was response to treatment (ie, decrease from baseline of ≥50% in number of FI episodes) at 6 months; a prespecified secondary end point was change in fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) score at 6 months. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed for baseline and demographic characteristics and prior FI treatments. RESULTS: Overall, response to treatment was significantly greater with NASHA/Dx versus sham injection (52.7% vs 32.1%; P=0.0089). All subgroups analyzed demonstrated evidence of improvement, favoring NASHA/Dx versus sham treatment for both response to treatment and change in the FIQL coping/behavior subscale score. For the primary end point, a significantly greater percentage of patients with CCFIS ≤15, FI symptoms ≤5 years' duration, or obstetric causes of FI responded to NASHA/Dx treatment versus patients receiving sham treatment (51.1% vs 28.3%, P=0.0169; 55.4% vs 25.7%, P=0.0026; and 53.6% vs 23.1%, P=0.0191, respectively). The mean change in the FIQL coping/behavior score significantly favored NASHA/Dx versus sham treatment for patients with CCFIS ≤15 (P=0.0371), FI symptoms ≤5 years' duration (P=0.0289), or obstetric causes of FI (P=0.0384). Patients without a history of specific FI treatments (eg, antidiarrheal medications, biofeedback, surgery) were more likely to respond to NASHA/Dx versus sham treatment for both end points. CONCLUSION: Although all subgroups analyzed showed evidence of quantitative and qualitative benefit from NASHA/Dx therapy, patients with characteristics indicative of mild-to-moderate FI may exhibit the greatest benefit.

Validity of the ≥50% Response Threshold in Treatment With NASHA/Dx Injection Therapy for Fecal Incontinence.

OBJECTIVES: Many fecal incontinence (FI) studies define primary efficacy outcome as a decrease from baseline of ≥50% in the number of FI episodes; this threshold has never been validated. We aimed to establish the validity and responsiveness of ≥50% reduction in FI episodes (responder50) as the threshold indicative of clinically meaningful response. METHODS: Adults with a Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence score ≥10 were randomized to receive nonanimal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (NASHA/Dx) injection or sham treatment in a 6-month trial. Validity and responsiveness of the primary end point were evaluated post hoc. The data were compared using different thresholds for defining a responder for a number of end points. RESULTS: Data from 206 patients (NASHA/Dx, n=136; sham, n=70) were evaluated. Incremental patient response threshold increases showed that although the percentage of patients who achieved response decreased with increasing threshold, the difference between treatments remained significant up to an 80% response threshold (NASHA/Dx, 23%; sham, 10%; P=0.02). Response thresholds between 40% and 80% demonstrated evidence for convergent validity, with the strongest correlation with the number of FI episodes, the number of FI episodes when the patient was awake, and the number of FI-free days observed at ≥40% and ≥50% thresholds. Further examination of the responder50 threshold indicated that, regardless of treatment (NASHA/Dx or sham), responders performed significantly better than nonresponders on nearly all secondary efficacy end points. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the responsiveness, validity, and clinical applicability of the ≥50% response threshold in clinical studies of patients with FI receiving treatment with NASHA/Dx.