Health resource utilization among US veterans with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: A comparison before and after video-EEG monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Prior to establishing the correct diagnosis, patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) frequently endure significant costs and morbidities associated with utilization of health care resources. In this study of the US veterans population, we aimed to investigate for potential changes in health resource utilization before versus after video-EEG (VEEG) confirmation and disclosure of the PNES diagnosis. METHODS: We prospectively studied 65 veterans with VEEG confirmed diagnosis of PNES, and followed their health care utilization during the subsequent 3 years after the diagnosis. Primary outcomes entailed comparing the quantities of post-VEEG outpatient visits and diagnostic procedures versus those during the 3-year span prior to the diagnosis. Secondary outcome involved specifically the measures of seizure-related antiepileptic drug (AED) use from time points before and after VEEG. RESULTS: Within the category of non-psychiatric outpatient visits, we observed significant post-diagnostic decrease in the utilization of PNES-related outpatient visits (p < 0.001). Contrastingly, we found significant post-diagnostic increase in the utilization of non-PNES-related outpatient visits (p = 0.004). When examining exclusively for psychiatric outpatient visits, we further observed a trend toward increased attendance of outpatient visits (p = 0.056) after VEEG. Utilization of diagnostic procedures was not significantly different before versus after VEEG (p = 0.293). 52.3% of the patients were prescribed AEDs for seizure-related purpose during the one-year period leading up to VEEG. By comparison, only 7.7%, 12.3%, and 10.8% of the patients were still on AEDs for seizure-related purpose at the one-year, two-year, and three-year time points after VEEG, respectively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate new evidence that VEEG confirmation of the PNES diagnosis among US veterans can significantly reduce key measures of non-psychiatric/PNES-related resource utilization, while also potentially associating with appropriate enhancement of psychiatric outpatient visits. However, our results suggest that within this patient population, further efforts are necessary to address heightened demands for non-PNES-related outpatient visits after VEEG.

Brief group psychoeducation for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a neurologist-initiated program in an epilepsy center.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate therapeutic efficacy upon augmenting the initial communication to patients regarding the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) with a novel, brief group psychoeducation administered by the same team that provided the video-electroencephalography (VEEG) confirmed diagnosis and within 4 weeks of the diagnosis. METHODS: Prior to discharge from the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), a standardized communication strategy was utilized to explain the diagnosis of PNES to all patients prior to enrollment. Enrolled patients were then randomized to either participation in three successive and monthly group psychoeducational sessions (intervention group), or routine seizure clinic follow-up visits (control group). Both groups completed questionnaires at time of enrollment, and then at approximately 3 months (follow-up 1) and 6 months (follow-up 2) after discharge, assessing for: (1) primary outcomes that include a measure of psychosocial functioning, as well as interval difference in seizure frequency/intensity; and (2) secondary outcomes that include interval seizure-related emergency room visits or hospitalizations, development of new and medically unexplained symptoms, and results of an internal measure of knowledge and perception outcomes. RESULTS: The majority (73%) of patients from the intervention group commenced on therapy sessions within 4 weeks after learning of the diagnosis. Although we did not observe significant group difference in seizure frequency/intensity, patients from the intervention group showed significant improvement on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) scores at both follow-up 1 (p = 0.013) and follow-up 2 (p = 0.038) after discharge from the EMU. In addition, we observed a trend toward lesser likelihood for seizure-related emergency room visits or hospitalizations for the intervention group (p = 0.184), as well as meaningful insights from an internal measure of intervention outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that our cost/resource effective, brief group psychoeducational program, when administered early and by the same team who confirmed and communicated the diagnosis of PNES, may contribute to significant functional improvement among participating patients.

Diagnostic utility of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology for identifying psychogenic non-epileptic events.

The Structured Interview of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) is a self-report instrument that asks patients whether they experience atypical or implausible symptoms. The instrument has not been evaluated in an epilepsy population, and the potential for it to accurately distinguish between patients with psychogenic non-epileptic events (PNEE) and epileptic event groups has not been established. The SIMS was administered to patients in long-term video-EEG monitoring of these patients, 91 with PNEE and 29 with epilepsy were included in this study. Structured Interview of Malingered Symptomatology total scores as well as neurological and affective subscales were found to be predictors of group membership. Sensitivity and specificity across several different base rates of PNEE as well as maximum level likelihood ratios are presented. The findings not only demonstrate the utility of marked score elevations in differentiating PNEE from epilepsy but also point to considerable caution in interpreting mild elevations. Implications for the utility of this instrument in epilepsy evaluations are discussed.

Intact vs. impaired ictal sensorium: does it affect outcome of psychogenic nonepileptic events following disclosure of diagnosis?

It remains uncertain whether particular ictal manifestations of psychogenic nonepileptic events (PNEE) can reflect distinctive psychological processes or prognostic outcomes. We hypothesize that the integrity of ictal sensorium may affect the clinical outcome of PNEE following disclosure of diagnosis. We prospectively studied 47 veterans who were diagnosed with video-EEG-confirmed PNEE, presented with the diagnosis utilizing a standardized communication strategy, and followed for their clinical progress. When compared to patients with intact ictal sensorium, significantly smaller proportion of patients with impaired ictal sensorium endorsed improvement of either PNEE frequency or intensity across both the initial 1- to 3-month (p=0.005) and ensuing 6- to 9-month (p=0.01) follow-ups. However, improvement among patients with impaired ictal sensorium was more significantly associated with their level of understanding for the PNEE diagnosis across both the initial (rho=0.41, p=0.017) and ensuing (rho=0.43, p=0.015) follow-ups. Our study presents preliminary evidence underscoring the potential clinical significance of ictal sensorial integrity when evaluating patients with PNEE.

Telemedicine for delivery of health care in Parkinson's disease.

We have used telemedicine at the Seattle Veterans Administration Medical Center to deliver follow-up care to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients were located at eight facilities which were 67-2400 km from the medical centre. Each facility had videoconferencing equipment (connected by Internet Protocol at 384 kbit/s), and computer terminals that could access the patient's electronic medical record. Over a three-year period, we used telemedicine for 100 follow-up visits on 34 PD patients. Visits lasted 30-60 min. Patients and providers were satisfied with the use of the technology. Savings amounted to approximately 1500 attendant travel hours, 100,000 travel kilometres, and US 37,000 dollars in travel and lodging costs. For the first 82 telemedicine visits, the video quality was inadequate for scoring all components of the motor Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). For the last 18 visits, a different videoconferencing unit produced better video quality, which was satisfactory for motor UPDRS measurements, except for components that required physical contact with the patient (rigidity and retropulsion testing). Our experience shows that telemedicine can be used effectively for follow-up visits with selected PD patients who are unable to travel.