Performance of CADM1/MAL-methylation analysis for monitoring of women treated for high-grade CIN.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have shown that CADM1/MAL-methylation testing detects high-grade CIN lesions with a high short-term progression risk for cervical cancer. Women treated for CIN2/3 are at risk of post-treatment disease, representing either persistent (incompletely treated) or incident (early onset) lesions. Here, we evaluated CADM1/MAL-methylation analysis as potential tool for detecting recurrent high-grade CIN lesions (rCIN2/3). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multicenter prospective clinical cohort study was conducted among 364 women treated for CIN2/3. Cervical scrapes were taken prior to treatment, and six and 12months post-treatment and tested for cytology, hrHPV (plus genotype) and CADM1/MAL-methylation. When at six months either of these tests was positive, a colposcopy-directed biopsy was obtained. At 12months, all women underwent an exit-colposcopy with biopsy. In case of rCIN2/3, re-treatment was done. RESULTS: We found 28 rCIN2 (7.7%) and 14 rCIN3 (3.8%), resulting in a total recurrence rate of 11.5%. All 14 women with rCIN3 and 15/28 (54%) with rCIN2 showed hrHPV type-persistence. Of these, 9/14 (64%) rCIN3 and 8/15 (53%) rCIN2 were CADM1/MAL-methylation positive. All incident rCIN2, characterized by hrHPV genotype-switch, were CADM1/MAL-methylation negative. All three carcinomas found after re-treatment were CADM1/MAL-methylation positive. CADM1/MAL-methylation positivity at both baseline and follow-up significantly increased the risk of ≥rCIN3 (from 0.7% to 18.4%), and ≥rCIN2 (from 8.2% to 36.8%), compared to a consistently CADM1/MAL-methylation negative result (p-value: <0.001). CONCLUSION: Post-treatment monitoring by CADM1/MAL-methylation analysis identifies women with an increased risk of rCIN2/3. Our results confirm previous data indicating that CADM1/MAL-methylation analysis provides a high reassurance against cancer.

The contribution of HPV18 to cervical cancer is underestimated using high-grade CIN as a measure of screening efficiency.

In one geographical area, 14 high-risk human papillomavirus types in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3; n=139) and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; n=84) were analysed. HPV18 was more prevalent in SCC than CIN2/3 (OR 9.8; 95% confidence interval: 2.5-39). Other high-risk types prevalences corresponded in CIN2/3 and SCC. Evaluations using CIN2/3 as a measure of efficiency underestimate the contribution of HPV18 to SCC.

Distribution of 37 mucosotropic HPV types in women with cytologically normal cervical smears: the age-related patterns for high-risk and low-risk types.

Before guidelines can be set for the use of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) testing in cervical cancer screening and vaccine preparation, age-related prevalence of HR HPV types in cytologically normal smears has to be known. Therefore, in a cross-sectional study the prevalence of 37 different HPV genotypes and putatively unidentified HPV types was determined in 3,305 cytologically normal cervical smears from the general female population (15-69 years of age) using an HPV general primer GP5+/bioGP6+ mediated PCR assay. Subsequently, HPV-positive cervical smears were typed for 19 HR and 18 low-risk (LR) HPVs with an enzyme immunoassay using HPV type-specific oligoprobes in cocktails and individually, respectively. Overall, -HR and -LR HPV prevalences appeared to be of 4.6%, 3.3%, and 1.0%, respectively. Twenty-six different HPV types were detected in the 152 HPV-positive samples, the most prevalent types being HPV 16, 31, and 18. With regard to age, a peak prevalence of 19.6% for all HPVs was found in women 25-29 years of age, which declined to a mean of 4.3% in women over 30 years. With regard cytologically normal cervical smears (n = 3, 011) of women participating in the population-based screening program in the Netherlands (30 to 60 years), all HR HPVs showed decreased occurrence with increasing age, whereas the prevalence of LR HPV types remained constant. We suggest that screening for abnormal cytology implies screening for HR HPV infections and the subsequent treatment results in a decline of HR HPV prevalence in contrast to LR HPV prevalence during the years of screening.