Evaluation of Nicotine Pharmacokinetics and Subjective Effects following Use of a Novel Nicotine Delivery System.

Introduction: Novel nicotine delivery systems represent an evolving part of the tobacco harm reduction strategy. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of nicotine delivered by P3L, a pulmonary nicotine delivery system, and its effects on smoking urges and craving relief in relation to Nicorette inhalator were evaluated. Methods: This open-label, ascending nicotine levels study was conducted in 16 healthy smokers. Three different nicotine delivery levels, 50, 80, and 150 µg/puff, delivered by the P3L system were evaluated consecutively on different days after the use of the Nicorette inhalator. Venous nicotine PK, subjective effects, and tolerability were assessed. Results: Geometric least-squares means for maximum plasma nicotine concentration (Cmax), generated by the mixed-effect model for exposure comparison, were 9.7, 11.2, and 9.8 ng/mL for the 50, 80, and 150 µg/puff P3L variants, respectively, compared to 6.1 ng/mL after Nicorette inhalator use. Median time from product use start to Cmax was 7.0 minutes for all P3L, compared to 30.0 minutes for the Nicorette inhalator. Craving reduction was slightly faster than with the Nicorette inhalator as assessed with the visual analog scale craving score. The mean Questionnaire of Smoking Urges -brief total scores did not differ for both products. P3L was well tolerated. Conclusions: At all three nicotine levels tested, the inhalation of the nicotine lactate aerosol delivered with the P3L provided plasma nicotine concentrations higher and faster compared to the Nicorette inhalator. The plasma nicotine concentration-time profile supports a pulmonary route of absorption for P3L compared to the oromucosal absorption of the Nicorette inhalator. Implications: The combination of nicotine and lactic acid with the P3L device shows potential over existing nicotine delivery systems by delivering nicotine with kinetics close to published data on conventional cigarettes and without exogenous carrier substances as used in current electronic nicotine delivery systems. Altogether, the PK profile, subjective effects, and safety profile obtained in this study suggest P3L is an innovative nicotine delivery product that will be acceptable to adult smokers as an alternative to cigarettes.

Effect of varenicline on individual nicotine withdrawal symptoms: a combined analysis of eight randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Concerns exist that varenicline may cause neuropsychiatric side effects. Some of these symptoms (e.g., depression, irritability) have been measured in clinical trials using nicotine withdrawal scales. This study assessed the effect of varenicline on neuropsychiatric and other symptoms, as measured by the Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS). METHODS: We analyzed weekly individual MNWS symptom ratings in 8 randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled smoking cessation trials funded by Pfizer with similar methodology (n = 2,403 varenicline; n = 1,434 placebo). Ratings for the past 24hr were obtained prior to quitting and starting treatment and at Weeks 1-6 and 11 after the quit date. RESULTS: In repeated measures analyses controlling for baseline values, ratings for 5 neuropsychiatric symptoms (depressed mood, irritability, anxiety, difficulty concentrating, and restlessness) and urge to smoke were lower (p < .01) for varenicline than placebo at each timepoint. Worsening in scores from 0-2 (baseline) to 4 was less frequent on varenicline than placebo for all ratings except appetite- (significantly more frequent for varenicline, p < .0001) and sleep-related items. Repeated measures analysis for individuals with low levels of exhaled carbon monoxide revealed similar patterns except for a nonsignificant difference for increased appetite. CONCLUSIONS: Use of varenicline while trying to quit smoking reduces and does not increase neuropsychiatric symptoms such as depressed mood and irritability measured on the MNWS in smokers without current psychiatric disorders. It is associated with increases in sleep disturbance and appetite although the latter appears due to enabling more subjects to abstain from smoking.

Efficacy of the nicotine inhaler in smoking reduction: A double-blind, randomized trial.

Many smokers are not ready to quit but are interested in changing their smoking behavior, particularly if such a change is associated with a reduction in health risk. The present study evaluated the efficacy of the nicotine inhaler in reducing smoking. Exploratory studies assessed whether reduction in smoking was associated with reduction in markers of disease risk. A total of 429 healthy smokers (smoking at least 20 cigarettes/day) were randomly assigned to either nicotine-containing or placebo inhalers, which subjects were allowed to use ad libitum for up to 1 year. The nicotine inhaler was significantly superior to placebo in achieving reduction in daily cigarette consumption by at least 50% after 4 months, compared with baseline (18% vs. 8%, p = .004). Active treatment promoted smoking cessation: 8% of subjects in the nicotine group and 1% in the placebo group were abstinent at month 15. Throughout the study, smoking reduction, per se, independent of treatment group, was associated with a statistically significant decrease in exhaled carbon monoxide and serum cotinine and thiocyanate. Smoking reduction also improved established risk markers for cardiovascular disease over 4 months. The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the active and placebo groups. The most common treatment-related adverse events were throat irritation and cough. In conclusion, the nicotine inhaler can help smokers who are unable or unwilling to quit to reduce daily cigarette consumption, which may be a health benefit on its own and may further promote quitting.

A comparison of a nicotine sublingual tablet and placebo for smoking cessation.

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a nicotine sublingual tablet in smoking cessation in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient trial conducted between January 1996 and May 1997. Two hundred and forty-one adult smokers (> or = 10 cigarettes/day for at least 3 years) used nicotine 2-mg sublingual tablet (n = 120) or placebo (n = 121) for up to 6 months (a 3-month treatment period followed by a 3-month tapering period). Subjects who scored <7 on the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire used 1 tablet/h (up to maximum of 20/day), whereas subjects who scored (7 used 2 tablets/h (up to maximum of 40/day). Brief counseling was provided at baseline and at all visits. Self-reported abstinence was measured from week 2 onwards, confirmed by expired carbon monoxide (CO) levels <10 ppm at each visit (1, 2, 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months). After 6 weeks of treatment, CO-validated abstinence rates were 48% in the active group and 23% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001). At the 3-, 6- and 12-month visits, abstinence rates (active vs. placebo) were 33% vs. 17% (p = 0.0046), 21% vs. 11% (p = 0.0304) and 18% vs. 10% (p = 0.0606). Adverse events were mild and transient and reflected those reported with existing nicotine replacement formulations. We concluded that the nicotine 2-mg sublingual tablet was effective as a smoking cessation aid.