A clinical-in silico study on the effectiveness of multipoint bicathodic and cathodic-anodal pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Up to one-third of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are nonresponders. Multipoint bicathodic and cathodic-anodal left ventricle (LV) stimulations could overcome this clinical challenge, but their effectiveness remains controversial. Here we evaluate the performance of such stimulations through both in vivo and in silico experiments, the latter based on computer electromechanical modeling. Seven patients, all candidates for CRT, received a quadripolar LV lead. Four stimulations were tested: right ventricular (RVS); conventional single point biventricular (S-BS); multipoint biventricular bicathodic (CC-BS) and multipoint biventricular cathodic-anodal (CA-BS). The following parameters were processed: QRS duration; maximal time derivative of arterial pressure (dPdtmax); systolic arterial pressure (Psys); and stroke volume (SV). Echocardiographic data of each patient were then obtained to create an LV geometric model. Numerical simulations were based on a strongly coupled Bidomain electromechanical coupling model. Considering the in vivo parameters, when comparing S-BS to RVS, there was no significant decrease in SV (from 45 ± 11 to 44 ± 20 ml) and 6% and 4% increases of dPdtmax and Psys, respectively. Focusing on in silico parameters, with respect to RVS, S-BS exhibited a significant increase of SV, dPdtmax and Psys. Neither the in vivo nor in silico results showed any significant hemodynamic and electrical difference among S-BS, CC-BS and CA-BS configurations. These results show that CC-BS and CA-BS yield a comparable CRT performance, but they do not always yield improvement in terms of hemodynamic parameters with respect to S-BS. The computational results confirmed the in vivo observations, thus providing theoretical support to the clinical experiments.

A reliability analysis of cardiac repolarization time markers.

Only a limited number of studies have addressed the reliability of extracellular markers of cardiac repolarization time, such as the classical marker RT(eg) defined as the time of maximum upslope of the electrogram T wave. This work presents an extensive three-dimensional simulation study of cardiac repolarization time, extending the previous one-dimensional simulation study of a myocardial strand by Steinhaus [B.M. Steinhaus, Estimating cardiac transmembrane activation and recovery times from unipolar and bipolar extracellular electrograms: a simulation study, Circ. Res. 64 (3) (1989) 449]. The simulations are based on the bidomain - Luo-Rudy phase I system with rotational fiber anisotropy and homogeneous or heterogeneous transmural intrinsic membrane properties. The classical extracellular marker RT(eg) is compared with the gold standard of fastest repolarization time RT(tap), defined as the time of minimum derivative during the downstroke of the transmembrane action potential (TAP). Additionally, a new extracellular marker RT90(eg) is compared with the gold standard of late repolarization time RT90(tap), defined as the time when the TAP reaches 90% of its resting value. The results show a good global match between the extracellular and transmembrane repolarization markers, with small relative mean discrepancy (or=0.92), ensuring a reasonably good global match between the associated repolarization sequences. However, large local discrepancies of the extracellular versus transmembrane markers may ensue in regions where the curvature of the repolarization front changes abruptly (e.g. near front collisions) or is negligible (e.g. where repolarization proceeds almost uniformly across fiber). As a consequence, the spatial distribution of activation-recovery intervals (ARI) may provide an inaccurate estimate of (and weakly correlated with) the spatial distribution of action potential durations (APD).

Monophasic action potentials generated by bidomain modeling as a tool for detecting cardiac repolarization times.

Unipolar electrograms (EGs) and hybrid (or unorthodox or unipolar) monophasic action potentials (HMAPs) are currently the only proposed extracellular electrical recording techniques for obtaining cardiac recovery maps with high spatial resolution in exposed and isolated hearts. Estimates of the repolarization times from the HMAP downstroke phase have been the subject of recent controversies. The goal of this paper is to computationally address the controversies concerning the HMAP information content, in particular the reliability of estimating the repolarization time from the HMAP downstroke phase. Three-dimensional numerical simulations were performed by using the anisotropic bidomain model with a region of short action potential durations. EGs, transmembrane action potentials (TAPs), and HMAPs elicited by an epicardial stimulation close or away from a permanently depolarized site were computed. The repolarization time was computed as the moment of EG fastest upstroke (RT(eg)) during the T wave, of HMAP fastest downstroke (RT(HMAP)), and of TAP fastest downstroke (RT(tap)). The latter was taken as the gold standard for repolarization time. We also compared the times (RT90(HMAP), RT90(tap)) when the HMAP and TAP first reach 90% of their resting value during the downstroke. For all explored sites, the HMAP downstroke closely followed the TAP downstroke, which is the expression of local repolarization activity. Results show that HMAP and TAP markers are highly correlated, and both markers RT(HMAP) and RT(eg) (RT90(HMAP)) are reliable estimates of the TAP reference marker RT(tap) (RT90(tap)). Therefore, the downstroke phase of the HMAP contains valuable information for assessing repolarization times.