Radiotherapy for oligometastatic cancer: a survey among radiation oncologists of Lombardy (AIRO-Lombardy), Italy.

AIMS: To evaluate the use of radiotherapy (RT) for oligometastatic cancer (OMC) among radiation oncologists in Lombardy, Italy. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A survey with 12 items regarding data of 2016 was sent to all 34 Lombardy RT centers. The survey included six general items and six specific items regarding patient/disease/treatment characteristics. RESULTS: Thirteen centers answered the survey (38%). All centers responded to general items and 12 centers submitted patient/disease/treatment data. General items The majority of centers (8/13) consider OMC if metastases number is less than 5. The most commonly prescribed dose/fraction is 5-10 Gy (8/13) using schedules of 3-5 fractions (11/13). Patient data items A total of 15.681 patients were treated in 2016 with external beam RT in 12 responding centers, and 1.087 patients were treated for OMC (7%). Primary tumor included lung, prostate, breast, colorectal and other malignancies in 33%, 21%, 12%, 9% and 25% of all OMC patients, respectively. Brain, lymph node, lung, bone, liver and others were the most common treated sites (24%, 24%, 22%, 17%, 8% and 5%, respectively). One and more than one metastasis were treated in 75 and 25% of patients, respectively. The vast majority of patients (95%) were treated with image-guided intensity-modulated RT or stereotactic RT. CONCLUSIONS: Seven percent of all RT patients in Lombardy are treated for OMC. Extreme hypofractionation and high-precision RT are commonly employed. The initiative of multicenter and multidisciplinary collaboration has been undertaken in order to prepare the platform for prospective and/or observational studies in OMC.

Equipment, staffing, and provision of radiotherapy in Lombardy, Italy: Results of three surveys performed between 2012 and 2016.

INTRODUCTION:: Several efforts are being implemented at the European level to measure provision of up-to-date radiation treatments across the continent. METHODS:: A snapshot survey involving all radiation oncology centers within Lombardy, Italy, was performed in 2012 and repeated in 2014 and 2016, in cooperation with regional governmental officers. Centers were asked to provide detailed information concerning all individual patients being treated on the index day, and to report data on available local resources. RESULTS:: We observed an increase in the number of centers and of megavoltage units (MVU) (from 76 to 87, i.e., 8.7 MVU per million inhabitants in 2016). Mean number of MVU per center was 2.5. Average age of MVU increased from 5.3 to 7.5 years and patients on the waiting list also increased. Conformal 3D radiotherapy (RT) treatments decreased from 56% to 42% and were progressively replaced by intensity-modulated RT treatments (from 39% to 49%). Waiting times were overall satisfactory. Radiation oncologists treated on average 152 and radiation therapists 100 RT courses per year. Average reimbursement per course was €4,879 (range €2,476-€8,014). CONCLUSIONS:: The methodology of snapshot survey proved feasible and provided valuable information about radiation oncology provision and accessibility in Lombardy.

Diarrhoea in irradiated patients: a prospective multicentre observational study.

AIMS: To determine the incidence of cancer treatment-induced diarrhoea in patients submitted to irradiation. METHODS: Forty-five Italian radiation oncology departments took part in this prospective observational study and a total of 1020 patients were enrolled. The accrual lasted three consecutive weeks; evaluation was based on diary cards filled in daily by patients during radiotherapy and one week after cessation. Diary cards recorded both the onset and intensity of diarrhoea. RESULTS: A total of 1004 patients were eligible for this analysis. 147/1004 (14.6%) patients had diarrhoea. The median minimum number of daily events was 1 (range 1-7) with a median maximum events of 3 (range 1-23). 82/147 patients (56.2%) had a drug prescription for diarrhoea. In the evaluation of the onset of diarrhoea, in multivariate analysis, we found the following factors to be statistically significant predictors of an increased likelihood of diarrhoea: primitive tumour site, therapeutic purpose and field size. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abdominal-pelvic cancer, treated with curative purpose and using large field sizes are at high risk of cancer treatment-induced diarrhoea. Diarrhoea was also observed in patients treated at other sites. In this population group there is the need for more stringent monitoring during the delivery of radiation therapy.

Radiotherapy in Italy for non-small cell lung cancer: patterns of care survey.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Surveys in clinical practice are useful to find how current clinical approaches follow recommendations from evidence-based medicine, to stimulate discussion in a multidisciplinary team, and to hypothesize collaborative multicentric trials. To assess management strategies for the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of lung cancer in Italy, in 2009, the Italian Society of Radiation Oncology Lung Cancer Study Group proposed the survey to all Italian radiation oncology institutions. Results were compared with literature data and international reports. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaires on patterns of care of non-small cell lung cancer were sent to radiation oncology centers active at June 2009 and evaluated data recorded in 2008. RESULTS: A total of 65 of 143 Italian centers responded to the questionnaire. The responding centers reflect the distribution of radiotherapy centers throughout the country. Of the treated patients, 55.2% were stage III, and most cases had a good performance status. FDG-PET was routinely used by 51% of centers for diagnostic and contouring phases. Postoperative radiotherapy was prescribed to pN1 and pN2 patients in 42.2% and 98.5%, respectively. The possible use of neo-adjuvant concomitant chemoradiation was declared by 70% of responders. A sequential chemoradiation approach was actually used in 43.6% of cases, induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant radiochemotherapy in 42.4%, and upfront concomitant radiochemotherapy in only 14%. In 53% of the institutions, patients have a clinical examination by a radiation oncologist only after the beginning of chemotherapy and in 82.4% of cases they have already received 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy. Most of the institutions exclude elective nodal irradiation from routine application. Total dose and fractionation in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, curative and palliative settings confirm literature data. There were significant differences in treatment planning constraints applied for lung, esophageal and cardiac tissues. Of the responding centers, 41% had stereotactic therapy for primary inoperable lung cancer and for metastatic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, daily practice differs in some ways from the evidence supported by the results of meta-analyses/clinical trials as regards concurrent chemoradiation approaches. It could be postulated that there is an urgent need for groups that collaborate with the other societies involved in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in order to offer the best therapy to our patients.

A prospective observational trial on emesis in radiotherapy: analysis of 1020 patients recruited in 45 Italian radiation oncology centres.

PURPOSE: A prospective observational multicentre trial was carried out to assess the incidence, pattern, and prognostic factors of radiation-induced emesis (RIE), and to evaluate the use of antiemetic drugs in patients treated with radiotherapy or concomitant radio-chemotherapy. The application in clinical practice of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer guidelines was also studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five Italian radiation oncology centres took part in this trial. The accrual lasted for 3 consecutive weeks and only patients starting radiotherapy or concomitant radio-chemotherapy in this period were enrolled. Evaluation was based on diary card filled in daily by patients during treatment and one week after stopping it. Diary card recorded the intensity of nausea/vomiting and prophylactic/symptomatic antiemetic drug prescriptions. RESULTS: A total of 1020 patients entered into the trial, and 1004 were evaluable. Vomiting and nausea occurred in 11.0% and 27.1% of patients, respectively, and 27.9% patients had both vomiting and nausea. In multifactorial analysis, the only statistically significant patient-related risk factors were concomitant chemotherapy and previous experience of vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Moreover, two radiotherapy-related factors were significant risk factors for RIE, the irradiated site (upper abdomen) and field size (>400 cm(2)). An antiemetic drug was given only to a minority (17%) of patients receiving RT, and the prescriptions were prophylactic in 12.4% and symptomatic in 4.6%. Different compounds and a wide range of doses and schedules were used. CONCLUSIONS: These data were similar to those registered in our previous observational trial, and the radiation oncologists' attitude in underestimating RIE and under prescribing antiemetics was confirmed.

Determinants of small bowel toxicity in postoperative pelvic irradiation for gynaecological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy for endometrial and cervical carcinomas from 1981 to 2000 were retrospectively analysed in order to assess the rate of late small bowel toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and six patients had received pelvic irradiation, with total doses of 40-55 Gy. The mean age was 57 years. Three hundred and eighteen patients had been treated for cervical and 488 for endometrial cancer; 46 had diabetes and 22 vascular diseases; 141 had a history of smoking and 367 were previously submitted to surgery for benign diseases. A CT treatment plan had been applied in 285 patients; 256 had been treated by arc moving therapy, 232 with 2 opposed beams (AP-PA) and 318 with 3 or 4 coplanar beams. Three hundred and forty-six were treated with X photons of 10 MV or more, 202 with 4-5 MV and 258 with cobalt gamma rays. Personalized blocks had been used in 389. Thirty-four women had received chemotherapy. Five hundred and eighty-four had been treated with dose fractions of 180 cGy or more and 56 had received a boost with brachytherapy or external beams. Eighty-one had needed treatment discontinuation due to acute small bowel toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 70 months. Thirty five patients had bowel obstructions, after a median time of 31 months. The 5- and 10-year toxicity rates were 4 and 7%. Uni- and multivariate comparisons identified age, acute toxicity and dose fraction as predictors for complications. CONCLUSION: Postoperative pelvic irradiation with standard techniques for gynaecological carcinomas results in tolerable rates of clinically significant late bowel damage, while older patients suffering from significant acute toxicity seem to be at higher risk.

Radiotherapy resources for the care of head and neck patients in Italy. A survey by the head and neck group of the Italian Association for Radiation Oncology (AIRO).

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In 2006 a survey was performed to define the resources available in Italy for the provision of radiotherapy services to head and neck cancer patients. This was the first initiative of the newly founded Head and Neck Group of the Italian Association for Radiation Oncology. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 138 radiotherapy centers active in the country. Items investigated included total numbers of head and neck cancer patients treated per year, waiting time before the start of treatment, general technical issues, and integration with surgery and chemotherapy. RESULTS: Sixty-nine questionnaires were returned (50% response rate). The total number of patients treated was 4,670, averaging 68 cases per center. The larynx was the primary site most frequently involved. Average waiting time was 30 days and 47 days for nonresected and postoperative cases, respectively. The combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy was delivered to nonresected and resected patients in 96% and 54% of centers, respectively. Survey response rates, waiting time, and the use of organ preservation protocols were the issues showing more variations across the country. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides important data on radiotherapy resources available for head and neck cancer patients in Italy. The evidence of significant differences across the country concerning several relevant issues and the potential for cooperative clinical efforts in this relatively rare group of diseases urge the Group to plan further initiatives.

Integrated treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.

Even a small percent increase in survival rates after treatment for lung cancer can produce a large benefit in terms of absolute numbers of lives saved, due to the very high incidence of the disease. Clinical results after surgery alone or radiotherapy alone are far from being satisfactory. Therefore, the integration of surgery with radiotherapy (both in the preoperative and in the postoperative setting) has been increasingly tested in the clinic. Radio-chemotherapeutic approaches progressively more effective have been developed for patients with inoperable disease, but also in combination with surgery. This review focuses on the current practice and on the ongoing clinical research in this field. The important issue of the short- and long-term toxicity of combined modality treatments in these patients is also emphasized, along with the research efforts for minimizing toxicity, especially as far as radiotherapy is concerned.

Radical radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: Results in a series of 1087 patients from two Italian radiation oncology centers. II. The case of T2N0 disease.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate local control rates, late damage incidence, functional results, and second-tumor occurrence according to the different patient, tumor, and treatment features in a large bi-institutional series of T2 glottic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 256 T2 glottic cancer cases treated consecutively with radical intent at the Florence University Radiation Oncology Department (FLO) and at the Radiation Oncology Department of the University of Brescia, Istituto del Radio "O. Alberti" (BS) were studied. Cumulative probability of local control (LC), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated and compared in the different clinical and therapeutic subgroups by both univariate and multivariate analysis. Types of relapse and their surgical salvage were evaluated, along with the functional results of treatment. Late-damage incidence and second-tumor cumulative probability (STP) were also calculated. RESULTS: In the entire series, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS rates were, respectively, 73%, 59%, and 37%. Corresponding values for cumulative LC probability were 73%, 73%, and 70% and for DSS, 89%, 86%, and 85%, taking into account surgical salvage of relapsed cases. Seventy-three percent of the patients were cured with function preserved. Main determinants of a worse LC at univariate analysis were larger tumor extent and impaired cord mobility. At multivariate analysis, the same factors retained statistical significance. Twenty-year STP was 23%, with second-tumor deaths less frequent than larynx cancer deaths (20 of 256 vs. 30 of 256). Incidence of late damage was higher in the first decade of accrual (22%) than in the last decade (10%, p = 0.03); the same was true for severe late damage (9% vs. 1.8%). CONCLUSION: Present-day radical radiotherapy can be considered a standard treatment for T2 glottic cancer. Better results are obtained in patients with less extended disease. Late damage is relatively infrequent, but a careful follow-up is warranted for early detection not only of relapses (because salvage surgery is feasible) but also of second malignant tumors, which constitute a relevant but not the leading cause of death in these patients and are potentially curable.

Radical radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: Results in a series of 1087 patients from two Italian radiation oncology centers. I. The case of T1N0 disease.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate local control rates, late damage incidence, functional results, and second tumor occurrence according to the different patient, tumor, and treatment features in a large bi-institutional series of T1 glottic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 831 T1 glottic cancer cases treated consecutively with radical intent at the Florence University Radiation Oncology Department (FLO) and at the Radiation Oncology Department of the University of Brescia-Istituto del Radio "O. Alberti" (BS) were studied. Actuarial cumulative local control probability (LC), disease-specific (DSS), and overall survival (OS) rates have been calculated and compared in the different clinical and therapeutic subgroups with both univariate and multivariate analysis. Types of relapse and their surgical salvage have been evaluated, along with the functional results of treatment. Late damage incidence and second tumor cumulative probability (STP) have been also calculated. RESULTS: In the entire series, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS was equal to 86%, 77%, and 57%, respectively. Corresponding values for LC were 86%, 84%, and 83% and for DSS 96%, 95%, and 93%, taking into account surgical salvage of relapsed cases. Eighty-seven percent of the patients were cured with function preserved. Main determinants of a worse LC at univariate analysis were: male gender, earlier treatment period, larger tumor extent, anterior commissure involvement, and the use of Cobalt 60. At multivariate analysis, only gender, tumor extent, anterior commissure involvement, and beam type retained statistical significance. Higher total doses and larger field sizes are significantly related (logistic regression) with a higher late damage incidence. Scatterplot analysis of various combinations of field dimensions and total dose showed that field dimensions >35 and <49 cm2, together with doses of >65 Gy, offer the best local control results together with an acceptably low late damage incidence. Twenty-year STP was equal to 23%, with second tumor deaths being more frequent than larynx cancer deaths (67 of 831 vs. 46/831). CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the opinion, suggested by some international guidelines, that radiotherapy is standard treatment for T1 glottic cancer. Better results are obtained in patients with less extended disease and with 4-6 MV photon beams. The use of doses in excess of 65 Gy and of field sizes of 36-49 cm2 is probably the best technical choice available. Late damage is infrequent, but careful follow-up is warranted to detect early not only relapses (because conservative salvage surgery is feasible), but also second malignant tumors, which constitute the main cause of death in these patients and are potentially curable.

Localized extranodal lymphoma of the head and neck: retrospective analysis of a series of 107 patients from a single institution.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively analyze the outcome and patterns of relapse in localized extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the head and neck (HN-NHL) after radiotherapy alone or combined modality treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 107 patients with HN-NHL was performed. Relapse patterns, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. Only stage I (n=50) and stage II (n=57) patients were included with either low-grade (n=21) or high-grade (n=86) lymphoma. Fifty-nine patients were treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone and 48 patients received combined-modality treatment (CMT) consisting of chemotherapy (CHOP or CHOP-like) followed by radiotherapy. The volumes of irradiation included local field (n=24), involved field (n=13) and extended field (n=70). The median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range, 17-86 years). RESULTS: The overall response rates (CR+PR) in the radiotherapy group and the combined modality group were 100% and 96%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 49.4 months, 29 of 59 patients after RT alone (37%) and 30 of 48 patients after CMT (62%) were disease-free. In the whole series the projected five-year OS and RFS were 58.7% and 61.8%. At univariate analysis of clinical variables with potential impact on survival including age, stage, histology, IPI score, single or combined treatment and volumes of irradiation, only age and, to a limited extent, type of treatment influenced OS (age < or =60 years 79%, >60 years 41%, P < 0.001; RT alone 54.9%, CMT 62.8%, P = 0.0487) and RFS (< or =60 years 75%, >60 years 50%, P < 0.001; RT alone 54%, CMT 71%, P = 0.039). Better OS and RFS rates were obtained in patients with stage II and high-grade disease treated with CMT (five-year OS and RFS 63% and 69%, respectively; the corresponding values for RT alone were 38% and 34%). The final model of the multivariate analysis retained only age (< or =60 years) as a significant prognostic factor for both RFS and OS (P < 0.001). In the whole series, the sites of relapse were mainly systemic (n = 32/40, 80%) and in-field relapses were rare (n = 3/40, 7.5%). CONCLUSION: HN-NHL is characterized by a high risk of relapse, particularly at distant sites. Older patients have a significantly worse prognosis. Radiotherapy offers a very good local control rate although combined modality treatment possibly produces better RFS and OS, especially for stage II and high-grade disease. Better systemic approaches are warranted for a more consistent impact on survival in this particular subset of extranodal lymphoma. However, radiotherapy alone may offer a feasible and effective modality for patients who cannot tolerate more aggressive treatments. Extended-field radiotherapy and the treatment of a larger number of uninvolved lymph nodal regions does not confer a RFS or OS advantage, either after RT alone or after CMT.

Which role for radiation therapy in ethmoid cancer? A retrospective analysis of 84 cases from a single institution.

PURPOSE: To define the results of radiotherapy for the treatment of ethmoid carcinoma in a large, retrospective, substantially unselected series from a single institution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A relatively large series of 84 consecutive patients treated at our Institution over a 30-year period (1970-2000) was retrospectively analyzed. Sixteen more patients treated in the same period were affected by a relapse of disease at presentation and were therefore excluded from the analysis. Most of the patients had T3 or T4 disease (76%), and half of them had undifferentiated (G3-G4) tumors. Radical surgery preceded radiotherapy in 60 patients, the remaining had only biopsy or incomplete surgery. Average ICRU dose varied according to the extent of postsurgical residual disease. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial overall survival of the entire series was 48.6%, 5-year disease-specific survival 58%, and 5-year relapse-free survival 54.6%. Overall, disease-specific and relapse-free survival were significantly better (logrank test) for early stage patients (T1-T2) and for those with low-grade disease; relapse-free and disease-specific survival were also significantly (or almost significantly) better for patients who had radical surgery and for those with less extended postsurgical residue. Patients treated with radiotherapy after biopsy only or grossly incomplete surgery had 5-year relapse-free, disease-specific and overall survival of 22%, 42% and 37%, respectively. Higher cumulative doses (>60 Gy) were related to a not significantly lower recurrence probability in patients with micro- or macroscopic residual disease after surgery (54% vs 62%). Multivariate analysis (Cox model) showed that only T stage and grading were independent prognostic factors for overall and disease-specific survival, whereas the prognostic impact of radical surgery was limited to relapse-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Radical radiation therapy alone is able to cure about 25% of the unfavorably selected cases, after biopsy only or partial surgery. Radical surgery is associated with better relapse-free survival rates, but the contribution of postoperative radiotherapy to the primary treatment of these patients cannot be eliminated.