RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antenatal pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) in women without prior urinary incontinence (UI) are effective in reducing postnatal UI; however, UK midwives often do not provide advice and information to women on undertaking PFME, with evidence that among women who do receive advice, many do not perform PFME. METHODS: The primary aim of this feasibility and pilot cluster randomised controlled trial is to provide a potential assessment of the feasibility of undertaking a future definitive trial of a midwifery-led antenatal intervention to support women to perform PFME in pregnancy and reduce UI postnatally. Community midwifery teams in participating NHS sites comprise trial clusters (n = 17). Midwives in teams randomised to the intervention will be trained on how to teach PFME to women and how to support them in undertaking PFME in pregnancy. Women whose community midwifery teams are allocated to control will receive standard antenatal care only. All pregnant women who give birth over a pre-selected sample month who receive antenatal care from participating community midwifery teams (clusters) will be sent a questionnaire at 10-12 weeks postpartum (around 1400-1500 women). Process evaluation data will include interviews with midwives to assess if the intervention could be implemented as planned. Interviews with women in both trial arms will explore their experiences of support from midwives to perform PFME during pregnancy. Data will be stored securely at the Universities of Birmingham and Exeter. Results will be disseminated through publications aimed at maternity service users, clinicians, and academics and inform a potential definitive trial of effectiveness. The West Midlands-Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee approved the study protocol. DISCUSSION: Trial outcomes will determine if criteria to progress to a definitive cluster trial are met. These include women's questionnaire return rates, prevalence of UI, and other health outcomes as reported by women at 10-12 weeks postpartum. Progress to a definitive trial however is likely to be prevented in the UK context by new perinatal pelvic health service, although this may be possible elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10833250 . Registered 09/03/2020.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: People with gynaecological cancer commonly suffer from physical and psychological symptoms related to their cancer and cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effect of interventions with an exercise component for females with gynaecological cancer. DATA SOURCES: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, PEDro, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library were searched systematically in September 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials were included if they investigated the effects of interventions with an exercise component in patients with gynaecological cancer. STUDY APPRAISAL: Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of studies using the PEDro scale. RESULTS: Seven randomised controlled trials on five patient groups involving 221 participants were included. The mean PEDro score was 5.3 (standard deviation 1.5) out of 10. Compared with control groups, the intervention groups showed significantly greater improvements in physical activity levels and body mass index. No significant effects were found for fatigue, depression and health-related quality of life. A meta-analysis of functional exercise capacity and muscle strength was not possible due to insufficient data in the included trials. LIMITATIONS: The majority of studies provided exercise as part of multicomponent intervention programmes. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions with an exercise component appear to be effective at improving physical activity levels and body mass index among patients with gynaecological cancer. Further research is required to examine the effects of exercise interventions alone in this population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42014014019.
