Randomised clinical trial: anti-viral activity of ANA773, an oral inducer of endogenous interferons acting via TLR7, in chronic HCV.

BACKGROUND: The ANA773 is an oral prodrug of a small-molecule toll-like receptor (TLR)7 agonist. Preclinical and healthy volunteer clinical studies with ANA773 have demonstrated induction of endogenous interferon-α (IFN-α) of multiple subtypes, which supports the potential utility in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. AIM: To examine safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and anti-viral activity of ANA773. METHODS: The ANA773 was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 34 patients chronically infected with HCV of any genotype. Patients were treatment-naïve or had relapsed following previous interferon-based treatment. This dose escalation study was composed of four dose groups (800, 1200, 1600 and 2000mg). In each group, six to eight patients received ANA773 and two received placebo. Patients were dosed with ANA773 every-other-day for either 28 days (800, 1200 or 1600mg) or 10days (2000mg). RESULTS: Mild to moderate adverse events were reported, with an increase in frequency and intensity with increasing dose. No serious AEs were reported and there were no early discontinuations. There were dose-related increases in various markers of IFN-α response. The mean maximum change in serum HCV RNA level from baseline was -0.34, -0.29, -0.40, -0.97 and -1.26log(10) in the placebo, 800, 1200, 1600 and 2000mg cohorts, respectively. At the 2000mg dose, ANA773 significantly (P=0.037) reduced serum HCV RNA levels (range: 0.14 to -3.10log(10) ). CONCLUSION: The ANA773 was generally well tolerated and resulted in a dose-related IFN-dependent response leading to a significant decrease in serum HCV RNA levels in the 2000mg dose group.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal topotecan.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of topotecan when administered by the intraperitoneal route. METHODS: A dose-escalating Phase I trial was conducted in which fifteen % of the total dose was given as an intraperitoneal bolus in two litres of D5W and the remainder was given as a continuous intraperitoneal infusion over 24 hours. Treatments were given every 21 days. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed at the recommended phase II dose. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received a total of 43 cycles at 21-day intervals. The maximum tolerated dose was 4 mg/m2 and acute dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Other toxicities included leukopenia, anemia, emesis, fever, and abdominal pain. Although no objective responses were achieved, five of ten patients with ascites had a decrease in fluid accumulation with administration of intraperitoneal topotecan. The recommended phase II dose is 3 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic analysis performed at a dose of 3 mg/m2 demonstrated that elimination from the peritoneal cavity followed second-order kinetics with k1 = 1.6 hr(-1), k2 = 0.3 hr(-1) and first and second-phase half-lives of 0.49 and 2.7 hours, respectively. Plasma pharmacokinetic behavior was best described by first-order kinetics with k = 0.5 hr(-1) and a half-life of 3.9 hours. The pharmacologic advantage, expressed as the peritoneal to plasma AUC ratio was 31.2. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal administration of topotecan at 3 mg/m2 results in a substantial increase in drug exposure for the peritoneal cavity without compromising systemic exposure; this may be beneficial for the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer or intraperitoneal carcinomatosis.

Cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary: the impact of aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Beginning in July 1988, a planned program was undertaken to assess the role of aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced epithelial cancer of the ovary (Stages IIIa-IVa) undergoing cytoreductive surgery. Our intent was to perform a complete aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in all patients in whom we could surgically remove all intra- or retroperitoneal disease measuring 1 cm or greater. Accordingly, 56/77 patients (73%) underwent complete aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The remaining 21/77 patients (27%) did not, either because the lymphadenectomy would not have impacted on the patient's cytoreductive status or because intraoperative conditions precluded it. Positive lymph nodes were found in 36/56 patients (64%). Of these, 23/36 (64%) were macroscopically positive, and if left in situ would have affected the patient's cytoreductive status. Thirteen of 36 (36%) were positive microscopically. Reassessment laparotomy was performed in 44/56 (79%) of the patients having had a lymphadenectomy and is correlated to disease status. Median follow-up is 30 months (range 2-64 months). Survival analysis reveals: 10/20 patients (50%) with negative lymph nodes; 6/13 patients (46%) with microscopically positive lymph nodes; 10/23 patients (43%) with macroscopically positive, but surgically removed lymph nodes; and only 2/21 patients (10%) with residual disease measuring at least 1 cm in diameter are alive without evidence of disease. These preliminary findings suggest that the removal of macroscopically negative lymph nodes offers little benefit to the patient with advanced epithelial cancer and minimal residual (less than 1 cm) disease. However, the concept of cytoreductive surgery, whether it be intra- or retroperitoneal, appears to be validated by the fact that the patients undergoing removal of macroscopically positive lymph nodes have approximately the same chance of survival as those with microscopically positive and/or negative lymph nodes.

Phase I trial of cisplatin in combination with glutathione.

We treated 16 patients in a phase I trial of escalating doses of intravenous cisplatin in combination with the chemoprotectant glutathione given every 21 days. Forty-three of 44 cycles (98%) were evaluable, 85% of cycles were given on time, and the median number of cycles per patient was 2. Dose-limiting nephrotoxicity was reached at a dose of 175 mg/M2 of cisplatin. Other toxicities included ototoxicity in 7 patients (44%) and grade 3 to 4 nausea and vomiting in 15 evaluable cycles (34.9%). Myelosuppression was infrequent. An increase to 175% of standard cisplatin dose intensity is attainable with the administration of glutathione; however, toxicity is substantial and the number of tolerated cycles is limited. Alternatives to the single bolus dose schedule studied in the present trial should be explored in order to better define the clinical utility of glutathione in combination with high-dose cisplatin.

Phase I/pharmacokinetic study of high-dose progesterone and doxorubicin.

PURPOSE: We developed a new formulation of progesterone that permits administration of up to 10 g of progesterone as a continuous intravenous infusion over 24 hours and conducted a phase I clinical trial to determine whether progesterone could modulate the in vivo cytotoxicity of the P-glycoprotein substrate doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with advanced malignancies were treated with increasing doses of progesterone and a fixed dose of 60 mg/m2 of doxorubicin given as an intravenous bolus 2 hours after starting a 24-hour intravenous infusion of progesterone. RESULTS: Progesterone enhanced doxorubicin-induced myelotoxicity in a dose-dependent fashion without altering the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin. The steady-state plasma concentration of progesterone at a dose level of 4 g was 4.1 +/- 0.9 mumol/L, which was higher than the minimal concentration required to reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) in vitro. CONCLUSION: Progesterone enhanced the hematologic toxicity of doxorubicin without altering its pharmacokinetics, suggesting that progesterone could modulate P-glycoprotein at the level of pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells. Adequate tissue concentrations of progesterone could be achieved in vivo to modulate doxorubicin toxicity in the bone marrow and thus potentially in tumor tissue as well. Selectivity may potentially be gained by using hematopoietic growth factors to offset the enhanced hematologic toxicity of doxorubicin while leaving the enhancement of toxicity to tumor cells unchanged.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intraperitoneal ormaplatin.

Ormaplatin is a cisplatin analog which has demonstrated activity against cisplatin-resistant tumors in preclinical studies. We delivered 28 cycles to 14 patients in a phase I trial of intraperitoneal ormaplatin given every 28 days. The maximum tolerated dose was 88.4 mg/m2 and acute dose-limiting toxicity was abdominal pain. Other toxicities include nausea, emisis, fever, and severe neuropathy seen in 1 patient at a cumulative dose of 399 mg/m2. No objective responses were observed. Hematologic toxicity was mild. The dose recommended for future trials of intraperitoneal ormaplatin is 66.5 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic analysis performed at a dose of 66.5 mg/m2 demonstrated that the initial phase of elimination from the peritoneal cavity follows first-order kinetics with k = 0.69 hr-1 and half-life of 1.4 hr. Plasma pharmacokinetic behavior is best described by biexponential model with k1 = 0.369 hr-1, k2 = 0.107 hr-1, and first half-life of 2.9 hr and second half-life of 8.4 hr. Pharmacologic advantage, calculated by ratio of peritoneal to plasma AUC, is 17.1. If site-specific activity is demonstrated, then the intraperitoneal route of administration of ormaplatin at 66.5 mg/m2 may be beneficial.

32P following negative second-look laparotomy for epithelial ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal seeding remains a prominent failure pattern in patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, even following a pathologically negative second-look laparotomy (2LL). In an attempt to decrease the risk of peritoneal recurrence, we have treated patients with no clinical or histopathologic evidence of disease at 2LL with 15 mCi of chromic phosphate suspension intraperitoneally (32P). METHODS: Between 1973-1987, 69 patients with stages I-III invasive epithelial ovarian cancer in complete clinical remission were found to have no evidence of disease at 2LL. Fifty-one patients received intraperitoneal 32P. Thirty-five patients, otherwise eligible for 32P, did not receive it primarily due to other treatment protocols, peritoneal adhesions, or the recommendation that no further therapy be given following a negative 2LL. Patients in both groups were comparable with regard to stage, histology, grade, median age, residual disease following initial surgery, and chemotherapeutic regimen. The median follow-up for uncensored patients is 58 months (minimum, 18 months). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival rate from the date of 2LL was 86% for those receiving 32P and 67% for those not receiving 32P (P = 0.05). The corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 90 and 78%, again favoring patients treated with 32P. COMPLICATIONS: There were minimal acute side effects from 32P. Late adverse effects were similar in the two groups. Bowel complications were seen in 3 of 51 patients receiving 32P and 1 of 18 patients not receiving 32P. CONCLUSIONS: We have found intraperitoneal 32P administration immediately after 2LL to be a safe and well-tolerated therapy. Our data suggest that 32P confers a survival advantage to patients with a pathologically negative 2LL. These findings suggest a continued role for second-look laparotomy with the use of 32P in selected patients.

Profiles of women age 30-39 and age less than 30 with epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study a group of women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer at a young age (less than 40). METHODS: Tumor registry data were analyzed with respect to age at diagnosis, stage, grade, frequency of nulligravidity, and family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Frequencies were analyzed using contingency tables, and survival distributions were analyzed according to the method of Kaplan and Meier. Multivariate survival analysis was performed with the Cox method. RESULTS: We found significantly higher frequencies of low-grade tumors (90 versus 37%; P = .0003, chi 2 test) and early-stage tumors (45 versus 17%; P = .03, Fisher exact test) in women less than 30 at the time of diagnosis (very young patients) than in those between 30-39. We also found a significant (P = .017, Breslow statistic) survival advantage for the very young women. Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor grade as the independent variable for survival. CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept of a preclinical phase of epithelial carcinoma and show that young women may derive substantial benefit from ovarian cancer screening programs.

A study of the possible interaction of indoprofen with hypoglycemic sulfonylureas in diabetic patients.

Phenylbutazone was shown to impair tolbutamide metabolism with resulting potentiation of its hypoglycemic effect and increased danger of hypoglycemia. As indoprofen is widely used for treating rheumatic conditions, and in particular osteoarthritis, the possibility that it may increase the effect of sulfonylureas on blood glucose levels has been investigated. Clinical studies have been carried out in 24 patients with osteoarthritis. All of them had maturity-onset diabetes mellitus and were on sulfonylurea drugs (tolbutamide or glipizide). The trials were double-blind and were carried out according to two different experimental designs. Twelve patients were treated with 600 mg/daily of indoprofen for five days and placebo for an equivalent period of time according to a cross-over scheme. Another group of patients was treated with indoprofen for eight days preceded and followed by a four-day placebo treatment. In both studies concomitant treatment with the hypoglycemic drug was maintained with a fixed dosage. No important differences were found between blood glucose levels when the periods of treatment with indoprofen and placebo were compared. Consequently, it is unlikely that indoprofen treatment at the doses employed may interfere at the clinical level with the effect of tolbutamide or glipizide on glucose metabolism.