Adenosine increases LPS-induced nuclear factor kappa B activation in smooth muscle cells via an intracellular mechanism and modulates it via actions on adenosine receptors.

AIM: In inflamed and damaged cardiovascular tissues, local extracellular adenosine concentrations increase coincidentally with activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB). To investigate whether adenosine influences NFκB activation in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and, if so, to examine the role of its receptors. METHODS: VSMCs were isolated from NFκB-luciferase reporter mice, cultured and then treated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to activate NFκB signalling. Adenosine, adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists, adenosine deaminase and uptake inhibitors were used together with LPS to evaluate the role of adenosine and its receptors on NFκB activation, which was assessed by luciferase activity and NFκB target gene expression. RESULTS: Adenosine potentiated LPS-induced NFκB activation. This was dependent on adenosine uptake and enhanced by an adenosine deaminase inhibitor, suggesting that intracellular adenosine plays an important role. Non-selective adenosine receptor agonists (2Cl-Ado and NECA) inhibited NFκB activation induced by LPS. Selective A1 or A2A antagonist given alone could not completely antagonize the NECA effect, indicating that the inhibitory effect was due to multiple adenosine receptors. The activation of the A3 receptor further increased LPS-induced NFκB activation. CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine increases LPS-induced nuclear factor kappa B activation in smooth muscle cells via an intracellular mechanism and decreases it via actions on A1 and A2A receptors. These results provide novel insights into the role of adenosine as a regulator of inflammation-induced NFκB activation.

Inhibition of sodium-linked glucose reabsorption normalizes diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration in conscious adenosine A1-receptor deficient mice.

AIM: Glomerular hyperfiltration is commonly observed in diabetics early after the onset of the disease and predicts the progression of nephropathy. Sustained hyperglycaemia is also closely associated with kidney hypertrophy and increased electrolyte and glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule. In this study, we investigated the role of the increased tubular sodium/glucose cotransport for diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration. To eliminate any potential confounding effect of the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) mechanism, we used adenosine A1-receptor deficient (A1AR(-/-)) mice known to lack a functional TGF mechanism and compared the results to corresponding wild-type animals (A1AR(+/+)). METHODS: Diabetes was induced by an intravenous bolus injection of alloxan. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined in conscious mice by a single bolus injection of inulin. The sodium/glucose cotransporters were inhibited by phlorizin 30 min prior to GFR measurements. RESULTS: Normoglycaemic animals had a similar GFR independent of genotype (A1AR(+/+) 233 ± 11 vs. A1AR(-/-) 241 ± 25 µL min(-1)), and induction of diabetes resulted in glomerular hyperfiltration in both groups (A1AR(+/+) 380 ± 25 vs. A1AR(-/-) 336 ± 35 µL min(-1); both P < 0.05). Phlorizin had no effect on GFR in normoglycaemic mice, whereas it reduced GFR in both genotypes during diabetes (A1AR(+/+) 365 ± 18 to 295 ± 19, A1AR(-/-) 354 ± 38 to 199 ± 15 µL min(-1); both P < 0.05). Notably, the reduction was more pronounced in the A1AR(-/-) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that increased tubular sodium/glucose reabsorption is important for diabetes-induced hyperfiltration, and that the TGF mechanism is not involved in these alterations, but rather functions to reduce any deviations from a new set-point.

Peripheral adenosine A2A receptors are involved in carrageenan-induced mechanical hyperalgesia in mice.

Here we studied the role of peripheral adenosine A(2A) receptors in mechanical hyperalgesia during inflammation using mice lacking the A(2A) receptors. Unilateral s.c. administration of the local inflammatory agent λ-carrageenan induced profound mechanical hyperalgesia 24 h after administration in the ipsilateral hind paw in wild-type mice. In homozygous mice lacking the A(2A) receptors, carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia was significantly reduced compared to wild type controls. The reduction in inflammatory hyperalgesia seen in A(2A) receptor knock-out mice was not associated with changes in paw edema. CGS 21680, a selective A(2A) receptor agonist, produced significantly more mechanical hyperalgesia in wild type females than in wild type males upon direct s.c. injection into the hindpaw whereas it had no effect upon systemic administration. The hyperalgesic effect of CGS 21680 was markedly reduced in the A(2A) knock-out mice of both sexes. Subcutaneous ZM-241,385, a selective A(2A) receptor antagonist, injected into the hindpaw reduced the mechanical hyperalgesia following carrageenan in female mice, but not in males. The results indicate that activation of peripheral adenosine A(2A) receptors during inflammation is associated with mechanical hyperalgesia, and that this effect is more prominent in females than in males.

CX3CL1-induced modulation at CA1 synapses reveals multiple mechanisms of EPSC modulation involving adenosine receptor subtypes.

We characterized the role of adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes in the modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by the chemokine fractalkine (CX3CL1) in mouse hippocampal CA1 neurons. CX(3)CL1 causes a reversible depression of excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC), which is abolished by the A(3)R antagonist MRS1523, but not by A(1)R (DPCPX) or A(2A)R (SCH58261) antagonists. Consistently, CX3CL1-induced EPSC depression is absent in slices from A(3)R(-/-) but not A(1)R(-/-) or A(2A)R(-/-) mice. Further, A(3)R stimulation causes similar EPSC depression. In cultured neurons, CX3CL1-induced depression of AMPA current shows A(1)R-A(3)R pharmacology. We conclude that glutamatergic depression induced by released adenosine requires the stimulation of different ARs.

The birth and postnatal development of purinergic signalling.

The purinergic signalling system is one of the most ancient and arguably the most widespread intercellular signalling system in living tissues. In this review we present a detailed account of the early developments and current status of purinergic signalling. We summarize the current knowledge on purinoceptors, their distribution and role in signal transduction in various tissues in physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

Adenosine A(3) receptors regulate heart rate, motor activity and body temperature.

AIM: To examine the phenotype of mice that lack the adenosine A(3) receptor (A(3)R). METHODS: We examined the heart rate, body temperature and locomotion continuously by telemetry over several days. In addition, the effect of the adenosine analogue R-N(6)-phenylisopropyl-adenosine (R-PIA) was examined. We also examined heat production and food intake. RESULTS: We found that the marked diurnal variation in activity, heart rate and body temperature, with markedly higher values at night than during day time, was reduced in the A(3)R knock-out mice. Surprisingly, the reduction in heart rate, activity and body temperature seen after injection of R-PIA in wild type mice was virtually eliminated in the A(3)R knock-out mice. The marked reduction in activity was associated with a decreased heat production, as expected. However, the A(3)R knock-out mice, surprisingly, had a higher food intake but no difference in body weight compared to wild type mice. CONCLUSIONS: The mice lacking adenosine A(3) receptors exhibit a surprisingly clear phenotype with changes in diurnal rhythm and temperature regulation. Whether these effects are due to a physiological role of A(3) receptors in these processes or whether they represent a role in development remains to be elucidated.

Adenosine A(1) receptors and vascular reactivity.

AIM: Blood pressure is higher in A(1) receptor knock-out (A(1)R-/-) mice than in wild type litter mates (A(1)R+/+) and we have examined if this could be related to altered vascular functions. METHODS: Contraction of aortic rings and mesenteric arteries were examined. To examine if the adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated contraction of aortic muscle was functionally important we examined pulse pressure (PP) and augmentation index (AIX) using a sensor that allows measurements of rapid pressure transients. RESULTS: Contraction of aortic rings to phenylephrine and relaxation to acetylcholine were similar between genotypes. The non-selective adenosine receptor agonist N-ethyl carboxamido adenosine (NECA) enhanced the contractile response, and this was eliminated in aortas from A(1)R-/- mice. However, in mesenteric arteries no contractile response was seen and adenosine-mediated relaxation was identical between studied genotypes. A(2B) adenosine receptors, rather than A(2A) receptors, may be mainly responsible for the vasorelaxation induced by adenosine analogues in the examined mouse vessels. PP was higher in A(1)R-/- mice, but variability was unaltered. AIX was not different between genotypes, but the NECA-induced fall was larger in A(1)R-/- mice. CONCLUSIONS: The role of adenosine A(1) receptors in regulating vessel tone differs between blood vessels. Furthermore, contractile effects on isolated vessels cannot explain the blood pressure in A(1) knock-out mice. The A(1) receptor modulation of blood pressure is therefore mainly related to extravascular factors.

Adenosine signaling and function in glial cells.

Despite major advances in a variety of neuroscientific research fields, the majority of neurodegenerative and neurological diseases are poorly controlled by currently available drugs, which are largely based on a neurocentric drug design. Research from the past 5 years has established a central role of glia to determine how neurons function and, consequently, glial dysfunction is implicated in almost every neurodegenerative and neurological disease. Glial cells are key regulators of the brain's endogenous neuroprotectant and anticonvulsant adenosine. This review will summarize how glial cells contribute to adenosine homeostasis and how glial adenosine receptors affect glial function. We will then move on to discuss how glial cells interact with neurons and the vasculature, and outline new methods to study glial function. We will discuss how glial control of adenosine function affects neuronal cell death, and its implications for epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, ischemia, and Parkinson's disease. Eventually, glial adenosine-modulating drug targets might be an attractive alternative for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. There are, however, several major open questions that remain to be tackled.

Adenosine, adenosine A 2A antagonists, and Parkinson's disease.

Adenosine derived from the degradation of ATP/AMP functions as a signalling molecule in the nervous system through the occupation of A1, A2, and A3 adenosine receptors. Adenosine A(2A) receptors have a selective localization to the basal ganglia and specifically to the indirect output pathway, and as a consequence offer a unique opportunity to modulate the output from the striatum that is believed critical to the occurrence of motor components of PD. Indeed, the ability of A(2A) antagonists to modulate basal ganglia neurotransmission has been shown to be associated with improved motor function in experimental models of PD. This suggests that A(2A) antagonists would be effective as a symptomatic treatment in humans without provoking marked dyskinesia. Indeed, the A(2A) antagonist istradefylline reduces OFF time in moderate- to late-stage patients with PD already receiving dopaminergic therapy, with an increase in non-troublesome dyskinesia. Adenosine and adenosine receptors also exert actions relevant to pathogenesis in PD, raising the possibility of their use as neuroprotective agents. Both epidemiologic evidence and the current preclinical data strongly support a role for A(2A) antagonists in protecting dopaminergic neurons and influencing the onset and progression of PD.

Diabetes-induced hyperfiltration in adenosine A(1)-receptor deficient mice lacking the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism.

AIMS: Glomerular hyperfiltration is commonly found in diabetic patients early after the onset of disease. This is one of the first indications of the development of progressive diabetic nephropathy. It has been proposed that glomerular hyperfiltration is caused by decreased delivery of electrolytes to the macula densa due to the increased sodium and glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubule, which would increase the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) via the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) mechanism. In this study, we investigated the role of TGF in diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration by inducing diabetes in adenosine A(1)-receptor knockout (A1AR(-/-)) mice known to lack a functional TGF mechanism. METHODS: Diabetes was induced by alloxan (75 mg kg(-1) bw) injected into the tail vein. The 24-hour urinary electrolyte excretion was measured in metabolic cages, the GFR determined by inulin clearance under isoflurane-anaesthesia, and histological changes evaluated. RESULTS: All alloxan-treated animals developed hyperglycaemia (> or =20 mm). Normoglycaemic animals had a similar GFR independent of genotype (A1AR(+/+) 9.3 +/- 0.5 vs. A1AR(-/-) 10.1 +/- 0.8 microL min(-1)g(-1) bw) and diabetes resulted in similar glomerular hyperfiltration in both groups (A1AR(+/+) 14.0 +/- 1.7, n = 9 vs. A1AR(-/-) 15.3 +/- 1.9 microL min(-1)g(-1) bw). Diabetic animals had a similar tendency to develop interstitial fibrosis, whereas the glomerular volume was similar in both genotypes, and unaltered by diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the A1AR(-/-) mice develop diabetes-induced glomerular hyperfiltration, demonstrating that the TGF mechanism is not the major cause of the development of hyperfiltration. Furthermore, the hyperfiltration in the present study was not related to alterations in the glomerular filtration area.

G-protein-coupled receptors: an update.

The receptors that couple to G proteins (GPCR) and which span the cell membranes seven times (7-TM receptors) were the focus of a symposium in Stockholm 2006. The ensemble of GPCR has now been mapped in several animal species. They remain a major focus of interest in drug development, and their diverse physiological and pathophysiological roles are being clarified, i.a. by genetic targeting. Recent developments hint at novel levels of complexity. First, many, if not all, GPCRs are part of multimeric ensembles, and physiology and pharmacology of a given GPCR may be at least partly guided by the partners it was formed together with. Secondly, at least some GPCRs may be constitutively active. Therefore, drugs that are inverse agonists may prove useful. Furthermore, the level of activity may vary in such a profound way between cells and tissues that this could offer new ways of achieving specificity of drug action. Finally, it is becoming increasingly clear that some of these receptors can signal via novel types of pathways, and hence that 'GPCRs' may not always be G-protein-coupled. Thus there are many challenges for the basic scientist and the drug industry.

Sex differences in mouse heart rate and body temperature and in their regulation by adenosine A1 receptors.

AIM: To examine cardiac function, body temperature and locomotor behaviour in the awake adenosine A(1) receptor knock out mouse of both sexes. METHODS: Male and female A(1)R (+/+) and (-/-) mice, instrumented with telemetric devices, were recorded during basal conditions and after drug administration. RESULTS: Female mice had higher heart rate, body temperature and locomotion, both during daytime and during the night. Awake A(1)R (-/-) mice had a slightly elevated heart rate, and this was more clear-cut in males. Heart rate was also higher in Langendorff-perfused denervated A(1)R (-/-) hearts. Body temperature was higher in A(1)R (-/-) males and females; locomotor activity was higher in A(1)R (-/-) females, but not in males. The adenosine receptor agonist R-PIA (0.2 mg kg(-1)) decreased heart rate and body temperature, but less in A(1)R (-/-) animals than in A(1)R (+/+) mice (P < 0.001 in both parameters). The unselective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine had a minor stimulatory effect on heart rate in lower doses, but depressed it at a dose of 75 mg kg(-1). Body temperature was increased after a low dose (7.5 mg kg(-1)) of caffeine in both sexes and genotypes, and markedly reduced after a high dose (75 mg kg(-1)) of caffeine. An intermediary dose of caffeine 30 mg kg(-1) increased or decreased body temperature depending on genotype and sex. Locomotor responses to caffeine were variable depending both on genotype and sex. CONCLUSION: Thus, the adenosine A(1) receptor is involved in the regulation of heart rate, body temperature and locomotor activity, but the magnitude of the involvement is different in males and females.

Eliminating the antilipolytic adenosine A1 receptor does not lead to compensatory changes in the antilipolytic actions of PGE2 and nicotinic acid.

AIM: We examined whether compensatory changes after adenosine A(1) receptor knockout [A(1)R (-/-)] eliminate the antilipolytic actions mediated by this receptor. METHODS: Lipolysis experiments were performed on adipocytes prepared from the wild type A(1)R (+/+), A(1)R (-/-) and heterozygous mice. Gene expression was assayed with cDNA microarray technique and real-time PCR; protein expression with immunoblotting. RESULTS: The A(1)R was the only adenosine receptor involved in lipolysis. The effects of adenosine deaminase and 2-chloroadenosine were abolished in A(1)R (-/-) mice. The IC(50) value of 2-chloroadenosine doubled from 16.6 to 33.6 nm when half of the A(1)Rs were eliminated. Adrenergic alpha(2) agonists had no effects on lipolysis. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) inhibited lipolysis with an IC(50) value of 5.8 nm (4.7-7.2 nm) in the A(1)R (+/+) mice and 10.6 nm (9.0-12.6 nm) in the A(1)R (-/-) mice. Nicotinic acid inhibited lipolysis with an IC(50) value of 0.30 microm (0.19-0.46 microm) in the A(1)R (+/+) mice and 0.24 microm (0.16-0.37 microm) in the A(1)R (-/-) mice. G(i)alpha(1) mRNA was significantly up-regulated in adipose tissue from A(1)R (-/-) mice. However, immunoblotting showed that G(ialpha1) was not up-regulated at the protein level. CONCLUSION: The A(1)R mediates the antilipolytic actions of adenosine. Deletion of the A(1)R in mice does not result in compensatory increases in G-protein-mediated antilipolytic actions of PGE(2) or nicotinic acid.

Adenosine, an endogenous distress signal, modulates tissue damage and repair.

Adenosine is formed inside cells or on their surface, mostly by breakdown of adenine nucleotides. The formation of adenosine increases in different conditions of stress and distress. Adenosine acts on four G-protein coupled receptors: two of them, A(1) and A(3), are primarily coupled to G(i) family G proteins; and two of them, A(2A) and A(2B), are mostly coupled to G(s) like G proteins. These receptors are antagonized by xanthines including caffeine. Via these receptors it affects many cells and organs, usually having a cytoprotective function. Joel Linden recently grouped these protective effects into four general modes of action: increased oxygen supply/demand ratio, preconditioning, anti-inflammatory effects and stimulation of angiogenesis. This review will briefly summarize what is known and what is not in this regard. It is argued that drugs targeting adenosine receptors might be useful adjuncts in many therapeutic approaches.

Contribution of adenosine receptors in the control of arteriolar tone and adenosine-angiotensin II interaction.

Adenosine (Ado) mediates vasoconstriction via A(1)-Ado receptors and vasodilation via A(2)-Ado receptors in the kidney. It interacts with angiotensin II (Ang II), which is important for renal hemodynamics and tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF). The aim was to investigate the function of Ado receptors in the Ado-Ang II interaction in mouse microperfused, afferent arterioles. Ado (10(-11)-10(-4) mol/l) caused a biphasic response: arteriolar diameters were reduced (-7%) at Ado 10(-11)-10(-9) mol/l and returned to control values at higher concentrations. Treatment with Ang II (10(-10) mol/l) transformed the response into a concentration-dependent constriction. N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (A(1)-Ado receptor agonist) reduced diameters (12% at 10(-6) mol/l). Application of CGS21680 (10(-12)-10(-4) mol/l, A(2A) receptor agonist) increased the diameter by 13%. Pretreatment with ZM241385 (A(2A)-Ado receptor antagonist) alone or in combination with MRS1706 (A(2B)-Ado receptor antagonist) resulted in a pure constriction upon Ado, whereas 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT) (A(1)-Ado receptor antagonist) inhibited the constrictor response. Afferent arterioles of mice lacking A(1)-Ado receptor did not show constriction upon Ado. Treatment with Ado (10(-8) mol/l) increased the response upon Ang II, which was blocked by CPT. Ado (10(-5) mol/l) did not influence the Ang II response, but an additional blockade of A(2)-Ado receptors enhanced it. The action of Ado on constrictor A(1)-Ado receptors and dilatory A(2)-Ado receptors modulates the interaction with Ang II. Both directions of Ado-Ang II interaction, which predominantly leads to an amplification of the contractile response, are important for the operation of the TGF.

Differences between A 68930 and SKF 82958 could suggest synergistic roles of D1 and D5 receptors.

The isochroman A 68930 and the benzazepine SKF 82958 are two full dopamine D1 receptor agonists. Responses to these compounds are different in several important aspects. When given to rats in a novel environment, A 68930 caused a dose-dependent (0.019-4.9 mg/kg) suppression of locomotion. SKF 82958 had no such effect at any dose studied (0.051-3.3 mg/kg). In animals habituated to the environment, A 68930 had no effect but SKF 82958 increased locomotor activity. Both A 68930 and SKF 82958 caused a decrease in core temperature at early time points. Both agonists increased c-fos and NGFI-A expression in caudate putamen but only SKF 82958 did so in the accumbens nucleus (at 1.6 mg/kg). Quantitative receptor autoradiography showed that A 68930 is 9-13 times more potent than SKF 82958 at displacing the selective dopamine D1 antagonist [3H]SCH 23390. This difference agrees with the difference observed when the agonists were used to stimulate cAMP formation in cells transfected with the D1 receptor. In contrast, SKF 82958 was 5 times more potent than A 68930 in cells transfected with the D5 receptor. We suggest that the balance between signaling via dopamine D1 and D5 receptors determines the functional effects of agonists at D1/D5 receptors.

Intake inhibition by NPY and CCK-8: A challenge of the notion of NPY as an "Orexigen".

We tested the hypothesis that neuropeptide Y (NPY) interacts with cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) in inhibition of intake of an intraorally infused solution of sucrose, a test of consummatory ingestive behavior. Both intracerebroventricular infusion of NPY (10 microg) and intraperitoneal injection of CCK-8 (0.5 micro/kg) reduced the intake of a 1M solution of sucrose infused intraorally at a rate of 0.5 ml/min in ovariectomized female rats, but the two peptides did not interact in inhibiting intraoral intake. By contrast, NPY increased intake if the sucrose solution was ingested from a bottle, a test demanding both appetitive and consummatory ingestive responses. CCK-8 inhibited intake in this test and its inhibitory effect was increased by simultaneous treatment with NPY. The activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), a brainstem relay mediating inhibition of intake, judged by the expression of c-fos-like immunoreactivity, was significantly increased after treatment with CCK-8 or NPY to approximately the same extent. Combined treatment with NPY and CCK-8 did not increase the c-fos-like immunoreactivity in the NTS above treatment with NPY or CCK-8 alone. These results strengthen the hypothesis that NPY, like CCK-8, is an inhibitor of consummatory ingestive behavior and suggest that this inhibition is mediated via the NTS.

Adenosine A receptors are necessary for protection of the murine heart by remote, delayed adaptation to ischaemia.

AIMS: Adenosine is involved in classic pre-conditioning (PC) in most species, acting through especially adenosine A1 and A3 receptors. We studied whether the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) was important for remote, delayed adaptation to ischaemia using a mouse with targeted deletion of the A1R gene. METHODS: Remote, delayed adaptation was evoked by brain ischaemia (BIPC) through bilateral ligation of the internal carotid arteries. Through microdialysis probes placed in the brain and the abdominal aorta, we found that plasma adenosine increased following carotid artery ligation. Twenty-four hours after ligation, hearts were isolated, Langendorff perfused and subjected to 40 min global ischaemia and 60 min reperfusion. Hearts from sham operated and BIPC animals either with (A1R+/+) or without (A1R-/-) the gene for the adenosine A(1)R were compared with each other. RESULTS: In wild types, BIPC reduced infarct size and improved functional recovery during reperfusion, but BIPC did not protect hearts of A1R-/- mice. There were no significant differences between sham-operated A1R+/+ and A1R-/- in recovery of function or infarct size. The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase1/2 (ERK1/2), p38 and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) were phosphorylated during reperfusion of sham treated hearts. The increase in ERK1/2 and p38 phosphorylation detected was attenuated in hearts of BIPC or A1R-/- animals. CONCLUSION: During BIPC adenosine acting on the A1R appears necessary for myocardial protection. MAPK signalling may possibly be involved in organ protection during the delayed phase of remote, delayed adaptation.

Distribution of antinociceptive adenosine A1 receptors in the spinal cord dorsal horn, and relationship to primary afferents and neuronal subpopulations.

Adenosine can reduce pain and allodynia in animals and man, probably via spinal adenosine A1 receptors. In the present study, we investigate the distribution of the adenosine A1 receptor in the rat spinal cord dorsal horn using immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, radioligand binding, and confocal microscopy. In the lumbar cord dorsal horn, dense immunoreactivity was seen in the inner part of lamina II. This was unaltered by dorsal root section or thoracic cord hemisection. Confocal microscopy of the dorsal horn revealed close anatomical relationships but no or only minor overlap between A1 receptors and immunoreactivity for markers associated with primary afferent central endings: calcitonin gene-related peptide, or isolectin B4, or with neuronal subpopulations: mu-opioid receptor, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, met-enkephalin, parvalbumin, or protein kinase Cgamma, or with glial cells: glial fibrillary acidic protein. A few adenosine A1 receptor positive structures were double-labeled with alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoaxolepropionic acid glutamate receptor subunits 1 and 2/3. The results indicate that most of the adenosine A1 receptors in the dorsal horn are located in inner lamina II postsynaptic neuronal cell bodies and processes whose functional and neurochemical identity is so far unknown. Many adenosine A1 receptor positive structures are in close contact with isolectin B4 positive C-fiber primary afferents and/or postsynaptic structures containing components of importance for the modulation of nociceptive information.

Decreased inflammatory pain due to reduced carrageenan-induced inflammation in mice lacking adenosine A3 receptors.

Mice with a targeted disruption of adenosine A(3) receptor (A(3)AR) gene were assessed for their nociceptive threshold and for their localized inflammatory response following carrageenan injected into the hindpaw. Under basal conditions no difference was seen between A(3)AR knock-out (A(3)AR(-/-)) and wild-type (A(3)AR(+/+)) mice in nociceptive response to mechanical or heat stimuli. The antinociceptive response to the intrathecal adenosine analogue R-phenylisopropyl adenosine (R-PIA) was also unchanged in the A(3)AR(-/-) mice. In contrast, heat hyperalgesia, plasma extravasation and edema following carrageenan-induced inflammation in the hind paw were significantly reduced in A(3)AR(-/-) mice compared to the A(3)AR(+/+) controls. Thus, mice lacking A(3)AR had deficits in generating the localized inflammatory response to carrageenan, supporting a pro-inflammatory role of A(3)AR in peripheral tissues. However, no evidence for a role of A(3)AR in nociception and the antinociceptive effect of R-PIA was found.