Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
2.
Child Abuse Negl ; 25(4): 441-55, 2001 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11370719

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the programs for medical diagnosis of child abuse and neglect in three states and efforts to establish state-wide programs in two states. To describe common themes and issues that emerged related to the establishment and maintenance of these programs. METHODS: Five states were selected as case studies to represent a range of experience and type of function embodied in programs that address medical diagnosis of child abuse and neglect. Individuals knowledgeable about the programs or efforts to establish state-wide programs in their home states described these in detail. Inductive analysis was used to identify themes and issues that emerged across the states studied. FINDINGS: Themes emerged in three general areas: funding, services, and training. Findings related to funding were: 1) State funding was vital for initiation of statewide programs; 2) Alliances with other groups with parallel interests were successfully used to garner support for child abuse programs; 3) Services needed to be adequately reimbursed to be sustained; 4) Political climate often affected funding. With regard to services we found: 1) There was no optimal way to organize services, but rather many ways that worked well; 2) It was critical to address local service needs; 3) Provision of standardized quality services was essential. With regard to training: 1) Professional training was an integral part of all statewide programs; 2) New technologies, including televideo, have been explored and implemented to assist in training in statewide programs. CONCLUSIONS: Each state has taken a unique approach to programs for the medical diagnosis of child abuse and neglect. However, there are commonalities, particularly among the states that have been successful in establishing and maintaining comprehensive services and/or training.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/organização & administração , Planos Governamentais de Saúde/organização & administração , Criança , Proteção da Criança , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Ensino/organização & administração , Estados Unidos
3.
Pediatrics ; 107(2): E17, 2001 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11158491

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Communication about childhood vaccine risks and benefits has been legally required in pediatric health care for over a decade. However, little is known about the actual practice of vaccine risk/benefit communication. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to identify current practices of childhood vaccine risk/benefit communication in private physician office settings nationally. Specifically, we wanted to determine what written materials were given, by whom, and when; what information providers thought parents wanted/needed to know, the content of nurse and doctor discussion with parents, and the time spent on discussion. We also wanted to quantify barriers to vaccine risk/benefit discussion and to prioritize materials and dissemination methods preferred as solutions to these barriers. METHODS: We conducted 32 focus groups in 6 cities, and then administered a 27-question cross-sectional mailed survey from March to September 1998, to a random national sample of physicians and their office nurses who immunize children in private practices. Eligible survey respondents were active fellows of the American Academy of Pediatrics or American Academy of Family Physicians in private practice who immunized children and a nurse from each physician's office. After 3 mailings, the response rate was 71%. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of pediatricians and 72% of family physicians self-reported their offices gave parents the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccine Information Statement, while 62% and 58%, respectively, gave it with every dose. In ~70% of immunization visits, physicians and nurses reported initiating discussion of the following: common side effects, when to call the clinic and the immunization schedule. However, physicians reported rarely initiating discussion regarding contraindications (<50%) and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (<10%). Lack of time was considered the greatest barrier to vaccine risk/benefit communication. Nurses reported spending significantly more time discussing vaccines with parents than pediatricians or family physicians (mean: 3.89 vs 9.20 and 3.08 minutes, respectively). Both physicians and nurses indicated an additional 60 to 90 seconds was needed to optimally discuss immunization with parents under current conditions. Stratified analysis indicated nurses played a vital role in immunization delivery and risk/benefit communication. To improve vaccine risk/benefit communication, 80% of all providers recommended a preimmunization booklet for parents and approximately one half recommended a screening sheet for contraindications and poster for immunization reference. The learning method most highly endorsed by all providers was practical materials (80%). Other desirable learning methods varied significantly by provider type. CONCLUSIONS: There was a mismatch between the legal mandate for Vaccine Information Statement distribution and the actual practice in private office settings. The majority of providers reported discussing some aspect of vaccine communication but 40% indicated that they did not mention risks. Legal and professional guidelines for appropriate content and delivery of vaccine communication need to be clarified and to be made easily accessible for busy private practitioners. Efforts to improve risk/benefit communication in private practice should take into consideration the limited time available in an office well-infant visit and should be aimed at both the nurse and physician.


Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Criança , Comunicação , Barreiras de Comunicação , Contraindicações , Estudos Transversais , Educação Médica , Educação em Enfermagem , Grupos Focais , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
4.
Subst Use Misuse ; 36(13): 1875-99, 2001 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11795583

RESUMO

In this paper, key barriers to providing smoking cessation services for low income individuals are illustrated using epidemiologic data from a population which was enrolled in a Medicaid managed care plan in Kansas during 1998. The Plan served 623 pregnant women who could potentially benefit from assistance in avoiding tobacco exposure. The prevalence of smoking among adult clients was 44.8%. twice the national average. Only 52.3% of adult smokers were advised by a provider to quit in the previous year. Most individuals in the client population (81.7% of the 10,733 members) were children, suggesting the importance of targeting environmental tobacco smoke exposure in order to reduce morbidity from asthma. The adult household member who needed smoking cessation services, however, was unlikely to qualify for health care benefits through Medicaid. The median length of enrollment was only 1.9 months, providing very little client contact time for tobacco control initiatives. The literature suggests that some providers may lack skills in treating tobacco as an addiction. It would be a major task for the managed care organization to train the 2,000 physicians in 68 of the 105 counties of Kansas who cared for this population. Potential solutions include improving reimbursement for smoking prevention and treatment, and developing cheaper smoking cessation services which are effective and acceptable among low-income individuals. The managed care organization could provide patient education materials and staff training for physicians and other members of the office staff.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Medicaid , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Kansas , Masculino , Gravidez , Saúde da População Rural , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar
5.
Patient Educ Couns ; 33(1): 25-37, 1998 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9481346

RESUMO

We used a randomized trial to compare two polio vaccine pamphlets written on a sixth grade level--the vaccine information statement prepared by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and an easy-to-read pamphlet we developed (LSU)--for reading ability, comprehension and preference among 610 parents with a broad range of demographic characteristics. Parents at all reading levels and incomes preferred LSU (76% vs. 21%, P < 0.001). Although readers of LSU achieved significantly higher comprehension (65% vs. 60%, P < 0.05) this difference may not be clinically significant. The information items presented with instructional graphics were the only items on which differences in comprehension levels achieved both clinical and statistical significance. Comprehension was lowest for the CDC mandated information on risks and the National Injury Compensation. Our findings demonstrate that simplifying written immunization material and making it more suitable will increase appeal, but such modification may not raise comprehension to an acceptable level without use of instructional graphics. Health education materials intended for general parent populations, which are written on a sixth grade reading level, may not adequately educate parents or prepare them for a discussion with their physicians.


Assuntos
Educação em Saúde , Pais/educação , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado , Vacina Antipólio Oral , Materiais de Ensino , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Feminino , Humanos , Louisiana , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
7.
J Rheumatol ; 22(6): 1166-70, 1995 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7674248

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) are less likely to have been breast fed than controls. METHODS: Case-control study of data obtained from a survey of mothers 54 children with JRA and 79 playmates regarding breast feeding. Duration of breast feeding was tabulated and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. RESULTS: OR for breast feeding in children with JRA was 0.40 (0.20-0.81, 95% CI) compared to playmates. For pauciarticular JRA (N = 28) OR was 0.31 (0.10-0.93); in polyarticular JRA (N = 24) OR was 0.60 (0.21-1.70). Lower OR for increased durations of breast feeding were noted in children with JRA. CONCLUSION: Children who have had JRA, especially pauciarticular JRA, are less likely to have been breast fed than controls, suggesting that breast feeding may have a protective effect on the development of JRA.


Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil/epidemiologia , Aleitamento Materno , Adolescente , Artrite Juvenil/classificação , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Razão de Chances , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Tempo
8.
Kans Med ; 96(3): 127-9, 1995.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8583738

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Recent reports suggest alarmingly low levels of literacy among adults in the U.S., but these are not expressed in grade levels. Assessment of the epidemiology of reading grade levels is necessary for development of patient education materials written at appropriate levels. METHODS: We measured demographics, reading ability and self-described health behaviors of 646 parents at two private, two university, two indigent and six public child-related clinics in a midwestern city using a bilingual oral interview and the Wide Range Achievement Test. RESULTS: Parents were 59% white, 92% female, with mean age 28 years, mean years of school 12.1 and mean reading grade 8.7. Parents tended to read four to five grades below their highest completed school grade. Analysis of self-reported health behaviors showed that 69% had no private insurance, 31% smoked cigarettes, 35% had body mass index greater than 27, and 46% of parous mothers had never breast-fed. Prevalence odds ratios showed that all adverse health risks except obesity were associated with low reading ability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for public health professionals working in clinical care, health education and agency policy. Persons with low literacy levels appear to be at particularly high risk for adverse health behaviors. Education materials and teaching vocabulary should be appropriate for client reading grade levels.


Assuntos
Escolaridade , Educação em Saúde , Pais , Leitura , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Kansas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...