RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Cervical cerclage is controversial in twin pregnancies, although recent data from the USA supports its use where "physical examination-indicated". Limited data exist, however, in the extreme situation of 0-mm ultrasound-measured cervical length or even prolapsed membranes. This research compares the success of emergency cervical cerclage in multiple and singleton pregnancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all such cerclages performed at a tertiary hospital over a 15-year period. "Emergency" was where transvaginal ultrasound-assessed cervical length was 0 mm, with amniotic membranes at or beyond the external cervical os. Exclusion criteria were clinical or biochemical evidence of infection, regular contractions, bleeding, ruptured membranes, or gestation beyond 24+0 weeks. The primary outcome, or "success", was defined as birth >27+6 weeks of gestation, with the neonate alive 28 days later with no markers of adverse outcome (seizures, periventricular leukomalacia, intracranial hemorrhage more than Grade 2, or necrotizing enterocolitis). Demographic and cerclage variables were assessed against the primary outcome. Variables correlated with success were analyzed between multiple and singleton pregnancies. Comparison of all adverse outcomes was then adjusted using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 135 pregnancies were included (107 singletons and 28 multiples [all twins]). Success was achieved in 79 (58.5%; 57.9% in singletons, 60.7% in twins). Nulliparity, in utero transfer, symptoms, prolapsed membranes, and dilation more than 3 cm were predictors of failure, but twin pregnancy was not. After controlling for potential confounding variables, there was no significant difference in measures of success between singleton and twin pregnancies, apart from higher rates of neonatal unit admission. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency cervical cerclage, even in extreme situations, is as effective in twin pregnancies as it is in singletons.
