Splenic Vein Thrombosis Following Pancreas Transplantation: Identification of Factors That Support Conservative Management.

Prophylaxis for graft portal/splenic venous thrombosis following pancreas transplant varies between institutions. Similarly, treatment of venous thrombosis ranges from early re-exploration to conservative management with anticoagulation. We wished to determine the prevalence of graft splenic vein (SV) thrombosis, as well as the clinical significance of non-occlusive thrombus observed on routine imaging. Records of 112 pancreas transplant recipients over a 5-year period at a single center were reviewed. Venous thrombosis was defined as absence of flow or presence of thrombus identified in any part of the graft SV on ultrasound. Thirty patients (27%) had some degree of thrombus or absence of flow in the SV on postoperative ultrasound. There were 5 graft losses in this group. Four were due to venous thrombosis, and occurred within 20 days of transplant. All patients with non-occlusive partial SV thrombus but normal arterial signal on Doppler ultrasound were successfully treated with IV heparin followed by warfarin for 3-6 months, and remained insulin independent. Findings of arterial signal abnormalities, such as absence or reversal of diastolic flow within the graft, require urgent operative intervention since this finding can be associated with more extensive thrombus that may lead to graft loss.

Pancreas-After-Islet Transplantation in Nonuremic Type 1 Diabetes: A Strategy for Restoring Durable Insulin Independence.

Islet transplantation offers a minimally invasive approach for ß cell replacement in diabetic patients with hypoglycemic unawareness. Attempts at insulin independence may require multiple islet reinfusions from distinct donors, increasing the risk of allogeneic sensitization. Currently, solid organ pancreas transplant is the only remaining surgical option following failed islet transplantation in the United States; however, the immunologic impact of repeated exposure to donor antigens on subsequent pancreas transplantation is unclear. We describe a case series of seven patients undergoing solid organ pancreas transplant following islet graft failure with long-term follow-up of pancreatic graft survival and renal function. Despite highly variable panel reactive antibody levels prior to pancreas transplant (mean 27 ± 35%), all seven patients achieved stable and durable insulin independence with a mean follow-up of 6.7 years. Mean hemoglobin A1c values improved significantly from postislet, prepancreas levels (mean 8.1 ± 1.5%) to postpancreas levels (mean 5.3 ± 0.1%; p = 0.0022). Three patients experienced acute rejection episodes that were successfully managed with thymoglobulin and methylprednisolone, and none of these preuremic type 1 diabetic recipients developed stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease postoperatively. These results support pancreas-after-islet transplantation with aggressive immunosuppression and protocol biopsies as a viable strategy to restore insulin independence after islet graft failure.

Social and Financial Outcomes of Living Liver Donation: A Prospective Investigation Within the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study 2 (A2ALL-2).

Because results from single-center (mostly kidney) donor studies demonstrate interpersonal relationship and financial strains for some donors, we conducted a liver donor study involving nine centers within the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study 2 (A2ALL-2) consortium. Among other initiatives, A2ALL-2 examined the nature of these outcomes following donation. Using validated measures, donors were prospectively surveyed before donation and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo after donation. Repeated-measures regression models were used to examine social relationship and financial outcomes over time and to identify relevant predictors. Of 297 eligible donors, 271 (91%) consented and were interviewed at least once. Relationship changes were positive overall across postdonation time points, with nearly one-third reporting improved donor family and spousal or partner relationships and >50% reporting improved recipient relationships. The majority of donors, however, reported cumulative out-of-pocket medical and nonmedical expenses, which were judged burdensome by 44% of donors. Lower income predicted burdensome donation costs. Those who anticipated financial concerns and who held nonprofessional positions before donation were more likely to experience adverse financial outcomes. These data support the need for initiatives to reduce financial burden.

Complications and Their Resolution in Recipients of Deceased and Living Donor Liver Transplants: Findings From the A2ALL Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study was to explore long-term complications in recipients of deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) and living donor liver transplant (LDLT) in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL). We analyzed 471 DDLTs and 565 LDLTs from 1998 to 2010 that were followed up to 10 years for 36 categories of complications. Probabilities of complications and their resolutions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors were tested in Cox proportional hazards models. Median follow-up for DDLT and LDLT was 4.19 and 4.80 years, respectively. DDLT recipients were more likely to have hepatocellular carcinoma and higher disease severity, including Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. Complications occurring with higher probability in LDLT included biliary-related complications and hepatic artery thrombosis. In DDLT, ascites, intra-abdominal bleeding, cardiac complications and pulmonary edema were significantly more probable. Development of chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 was less likely in LDLT recipients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, p = 0.02). DDLT and LDLT had similar risk of grade 4 complications (HR 0.89, p = 0.60), adjusted for other risk factors. Once a complication occurred, the time to resolution did not differ between LDLT and DDLT. Future efforts should be directed toward reducing the occurrence of complications after liver transplantation.

Outcomes of living and deceased donor liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the A2ALL cohort.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents an increasing fraction of liver transplant indications; the role of living donor liver transplant (LDLT) remains unclear. In the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study, patients with HCC and an LDLT or deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) for which at least one potential living donor had been evaluated were compared for recurrence and posttransplant mortality rates. Mortality from date of evaluation of each recipient's first potential living donor was also analyzed. Unadjusted 5-year HCC recurrence was significantly higher after LDLT (38%) than DDLT (11%), (p = 0.0004). After adjustment for tumor characteristics, HCC recurrence remained significantly different between LDLT and DDLT recipients (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.35; p = 0.04) for the overall cohort but not for recipients transplanted following the introduction of MELD prioritization. Five-year posttransplant survival was similar in LDLT and DDLT recipients from time of transplant (HR = 1.32; p = 0.27) and from date of LDLT evaluation (HR = 0.73; p = 0.36). We conclude that the higher recurrence observed after LDLT is likely due to differences in tumor characteristics, pretransplant HCC management and waiting time.

Complications of living donor hepatic lobectomy--a comprehensive report.

A wider application of living donor liver transplantation is limited by donor morbidity concerns. An observational cohort of 760 living donors accepted for surgery and enrolled in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation cohort study provides a comprehensive assessment of incidence, severity and natural history of living liver donation (LLD) complications. Donor morbidity (assessed by 29 specific complications), predictors, time from donation to complications and time from complication onset to resolution were measured outcomes over a 12-year period. Out of the 760 donor procedures, 20 were aborted and 740 were completed. Forty percent of donors had complications (557 complications among 296 donors), mostly Clavien grades 1 and 2. Most severe counted by complication category; grade 1 (minor, n = 232); grade 2 (possibly life-threatening, n = 269); grade 3 (residual disability, n = 5) and grade 4 (leading to death, n = 3). Hernias (7%) and psychological complications (3%) occurred >1 year postdonation. Complications risk increased with transfusion requirement, intraoperative hypotension and predonation serum bilirubin, but did not decline with the increased center experience with LLD. The probability of complication resolution within 1 year was overall 95%, but only 75% for hernias and 42% for psychological complications. This report comprehensively quantifies LLD complication risk and should inform decision making by potential donors and their caregivers.

Recipient morbidity after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: findings from the A2ALL Retrospective Cohort Study.

Patients considering living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) need to know the risk and severity of complications compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). One aim of the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) was to examine recipient complications following these procedures. Medical records of DDLT or LDLT recipients who had a living donor evaluated at the nine A2ALL centers between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed. Among 384 LDLT and 216 DDLT, at least one complication occurred after 82.8% of LDLT and 78.2% of DDLT (p = 0.17). There was a median of two complications after DDLT and three after LDLT. Complications that occurred at a higher rate (p < 0.05) after LDLT included biliary leak (31.8% vs. 10.2%), unplanned reexploration (26.2% vs. 17.1%), hepatic artery thrombosis (6.5% vs. 2.3%) and portal vein thrombosis (2.9% vs. 0.0%). There were more complications leading to retransplantation or death (Clavien grade 4) after LDLT versus DDLT (15.9% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.023). Many complications occurred more commonly during early center experience; the odds of grade 4 complications were more than two-fold higher when centers had performed 40). In summary, complication rates were higher after LDLT versus DDLT, but declined with center experience to levels comparable to DDLT.

Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 1997-2006.

Deceased organ donation has increased rapidly since 2002, coinciding with implementation of the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative. The increase in donors has resulted in a corresponding increase in the numbers of kidney, liver, lung and intestinal transplants. While transplants for most organs have increased, discard and nonrecovery rates have not improved or have increased, resulting in a decrease in organs recovered per donor (ORPD) and organs transplanted per donor (OTPD). Thus, the expansion of the consent and recovery of incremental donors has frequently outpaced utilization. Meaningful increases in multicultural donation have been achieved, but donations continue to be lower than actual rates of transplantation and waiting list registrations for these groups. To counteract the decline in living donation, mechanisms such as paired donation and enhanced incentives to organ donation are being developed. Current efforts of the collaborative have focused on differentiating ORPD and OTPD targets by donor type (standard and expanded criteria donors and donors after cardiac death), utilization of the OPTN regional structure and enlisting centers to increase transplants to match increasing organ availability.

HIV-infected liver and kidney transplant recipients: 1- and 3-year outcomes.

Improvements in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated mortality make it difficult to deny transplantation based upon futility. Outcomes in the current management era are unknown. This is a prospective series of liver or kidney transplant recipients with stable HIV disease. Eleven liver and 18 kidney transplant recipients were followed for a median of 3.4 years (IQR [interquartile range] 2.9-4.9). One- and 3-year liver recipients' survival was 91% and 64%, respectively; kidney recipients' survival was 94%. One- and 3-year liver graft survival was 82% and 64%, respectively; kidney graft survival was 83%. Kidney patient and graft survival were similar to the general transplant population, while liver survival was similar to the older population, based on 1999-2004 transplants in the national database. CD4+ T-cell counts and HIV RNA levels were stable; and there were two opportunistic infections (OI). The 1- and 3-year cumulative incidence (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of rejection episodes for kidney recipients was 52% (28-75%) and 70% (48-92%), respectively. Two-thirds of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients, but no patient with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, recurred. Good transplant and HIV-related outcomes among kidney transplant recipients, and reasonable outcomes among liver recipients suggest that transplantation is an option for selected HIV-infected patients cared for at centers with adequate expertise.

Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence and death following living and deceased donor liver transplantation.

We examined mortality and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among 106 transplant candidates with cirrhosis and HCC who had a potential living donor evaluated between January 1998 and February 2003 at the nine centers participating in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL). Cox regression models were fitted to compare time from donor evaluation and time from transplant to death or HCC recurrence between 58 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) and 34 deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. Mean age and calculated Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at transplant were similar between LDLT and DDLT recipients (age: 55 vs. 52 years, p = 0.21; MELD: 13 vs. 15, p = 0.08). Relative to DDLT recipients, LDLT recipients had a shorter time from listing to transplant (mean 160 vs. 469 days, p < 0.0001) and a higher rate of HCC recurrence within 3 years than DDLT recipients (29% vs. 0%, p = 0.002), but there was no difference in mortality or the combined outcome of mortality or recurrence. LDLT recipients had lower relative mortality risk than patients who did not undergo LDLT after the center had more experience (p = 0.03). Enthusiasm for LDLT as HCC treatment is dampened by higher HCC recurrence compared to DDLT.

Effect of mycophenolate mofetil on rat kidney grafts with prolonged cold preservation.

The impact of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on initial renal transplant function is not well characterized. We tested how MMF may modulate graft function and survival in a syngeneic rat kidney transplantation model after prolonged cold preservation. Donor kidneys were preserved in University of Wisconsin for either 24 or 39 h prior to transplantation into nephrectomized rats. Recipients received MMF (20 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) blood concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The inflammatory response, tubular epithelial proliferation, and histologic damage 3 days post-transplantation were assessed microscopically. In the 24 h cold storage (c.s.) group serum-creatinine was measured. In the 39 h c.s. group 1-week recipient survival was determined. After 24 h of c.s., recipient survival was 100%. The number of T-cell infiltrates was low and not influenced by MMF, whereas renal ED1+ cell infiltration was significantly suppressed by MMF. Tubular cell proliferation was enhanced by MMF. Serum-creatinine levels and renal histology were comparable between MMF and vehicle-treated animals. In the 39 h c.s. group, recipient survival was 20% in MMF-treated vs 90% in vehicle-treated animals (P=0.001). MMF effectively suppressed inflammatory cell infiltration and inhibited tubular cell proliferation. MMF-induced structural damage was most striking in the renal papilla. In rat kidney grafts with moderate preservation injury (24 h c.s.), MMF, given at an immunosuppressive dose, showed predominantly antiinflammatory effects without compromising graft function. In grafts with severe preservation injury (39 h c.s.), MMF caused irreversible structural damage and inhibited tubular cell regeneration resulting in renal failure.

Ischemic preconditioning improves rat kidney graft function after severe ischemia/reperfusion injury.

UNLABELLED: Ischemic preconditioning (IP) has been shown to ameliorate renal ischemia reperfusion injury. Using a rat kidney transplantation model we determined if IP improves graft function after prolonged cold storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Syngeneic rat kidneys were divided into two groups. Prior to 42 hours of cold storage in UW and transplantation, one group (n = 10) received IP (15 minutes of warm ischemia/10 minutes of reperfusion), whereas another group (n = 10) received no treatment. Early graft function and 1-week recipient survival were assessed. RESULTS: Recipient survival was not significantly different between groups [70% (IP) vs 40% (non-IP); P = .28]. IP treatment led to a quicker recovery of renal function. On PODs 3 and 6, serum creatinine levels in the IP group were significantly lower compared with the untreated group. In conclusion, one cycle of IP (15/10) accelerates recovery of renal graft function after severe ischemia reperfusion injury. This simple treatment modality may improve outcomes of renal transplants with prolonged cold storage.

Experience with steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Steroid avoidance is possible in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents and induction therapy. We undertook a retrospective consecutive case review of patients treated at a university tertiary referral center. METHODS: Medical records of 44 consecutive patients receiving a pancreas-kidney transplant from November 2000 to September 2002 were reviewed. The immunosuppression protocol used in this series of patients consisted of thymoglobulin induction, combined with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Steroids were used only while thymoglobulin was given and were typically discontinued by postoperative week 1. Main outcome measures included graft and patient survival rates, rejection rates of the kidney or pancreas, infection rates, and surgical complication rates. RESULTS: All 44 patients received a kidney-pancreas transplant with systemic venous anastomosis and enteric drainage of the pancreas. Patient kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 95.6%, 93.2%, and 88.7%, respectively. Biopsy-proven pancreas rejection rates at 1 and 6 months posttransplant were 2.3% and 2.3%. Kidney rejection rates at 1 and 6 months were 2.3% and 4.6%. Reasons for patient loss included one death from sepsis and one cardiovascular death. Reasons for kidney loss besides death included a thrombotic microangiopathy. Reasons for pancreas loss included three thromboses, one mild rejection/infection, and one duodenal segment leak with infection. All patients who have been free of rejection have been off steroids for the duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Newer immunosuppression protocols without maintenance steroids are possible with minimal rejection in the first 3 months and equivalent patient and graft survival rates compared with earlier protocols utilizing steroids. The potential beneficial long-term impact of steroid avoidance will require further study.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of more potent immunosuppressive agents, rejection rates have decreased markedly in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) recipients. However, with more intense immunosuppression, opportunistic infections such as polyoma virus have been more frequent. The purpose of this article is to outline the clinical course of SPK patients who developed documented polyoma infection in the transplanted kidney. METHODS: A retrospective review of 146 consecutive SPK recipients from 1996 to 2002 was performed. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression, surgical complications, rejection episodes, and opportunistic infections were reviewed. Patients who developed biopsy-proven polyoma virus infection in the renal allograft were identified. RESULTS: Nine patients (6%) were identified who developed polyoma. All had received induction therapy with either OKT3 (5 mg/d for 10.5 days) or thymoglobulin (5.7 mg/kg). Patients without polyoma had received similar induction. Maintenance immunosuppression included Prograf/MMF in six patients, CsA/MMF in two, and CsA/azathioprine in one. Time to diagnosis was an average of 359.3 days (range 136 to 836) after transplantation. Two patients had undergone treatment for kidney rejection prior to the diagnosis of polyoma. Immunosuppression was decreased in all patients when polyoma was identified, and more recently Cidofovir has been administered. Despite these interventions, five of the nine lost kidney function (creatinine > 5.0 or resumption of dialysis). However, none of the nine developed pancreatic abnormalities as demonstrated by normal blood glucose and amylase and no requirement for exogenous insulin. Two patients underwent LRRT more than 1 year after polyoma diagnosis; both have normal kidney function (Cr < 1.5 mg/dL) at 4 years of follow-up. Polyoma virus was the leading cause of renal loss in this cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Polyoma is a serious concern for SPK transplant recipients. The pancreas, however, is spared from clinical evidence of infection, and no rejection was noted when immunosuppression was decreased. These graft losses appear to be a penalty of more potent immunosuppression, and a better treatment strategy is needed to prevent renal graft loss when polyoma is diagnosed. Retransplantation can be considered based on our limited experience.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for severe iatrogenic ureteral injuries.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation in cases of severe proximal ureteral damage. Many patients with complex proximal ureteral injuries have good functional renal parenchyma and wish to salvage their kidney. Autotransplantation is a viable alternative to nephrectomy in these frustrating situations. METHODS: Two patients, aged 32 and 36 years, underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy and autotransplantation for treatment of severe proximal ureteral injuries. The injuries included a ureteropelvic junction avulsion and a proximal ureteral avulsion, respectively. Both patients had good functional renal parenchyma. A transperitoneal laparoscopic approach was used, and the kidney was removed by way of a Gibson incision. RESULTS: The procedures were successful, with immediate return of renal function in both patients. A pyeloureterostomy to the native distal ipsilateral ureter was required in one and a direct ureterovesical anastomosis was performed in the other. In the 2 patients, the warm ischemia time was 4.5 and 4 minutes, the transplant operative time 175 and 150 minutes, and the estimated blood loss 150 and 75 mL, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. At follow-up, the kidneys were functional, and the patients had returned to their normal activity. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation is an excellent alternative to nephrectomy or bowel interposition in patients with proximal ureteral loss, irrespective of the contralateral renal function. This procedure is associated with acceptable morbidity and preserves the renal function. This approach is desirable in those patients who have had complications from other surgical procedures and are otherwise facing the loss of a normally functioning kidney.

Experience with the use of sirolimus in liver transplantation--use in patients for whom calcineurin inhibitors are contraindicated.

Sirolimus (SRL) provides effective immunosuppression for kidney transplantation and may be useful in patients with delayed allograft function after kidney transplantation. We review our experience with SRL in liver transplant recipients for whom calcineurin inhibitors are undesirable. Fourteen patients with renal insufficiency or acute mental status impairment were administered SRL after liver transplantation (5- to 10-mg load, 1 to 4 mg/d). Immunosuppression also consisted of mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. On resolution of neurological or renal dysfunction (return to baseline mental status or serum creatinine level), tacrolimus (TAC) therapy was initiated. Twelve patients received primary transplants, 1 patient received a combined liver-kidney transplant, and 1 patient received a third transplant. Follow-up was 2 to 7 months. Calcineurin inhibitors were initially withheld in 9 patients, and therapy was aborted because of toxicity in the remaining 5 patients. Mean times to the initiation of SRL and TAC therapy were 5.4 +/- 4.6 and 26.8 +/- 24.4 days, respectively. Serum trough levels of SRL did not correlate with dose or other patient variables. Two patients died after prolonged pretransplantation hospital courses in the intensive care unit. Six patients experienced acute rejection, but only 1 patient required antilymphocyte therapy. Serum creatinine levels at the start of SRL therapy were 2.2 +/- 1.1 and 1.2 +/- 0.6 mg/dL at 3 months. All 3 patients with neurological indications for SRL had a return to their baseline mental status. All patients had improved liver function chemistry test results and prothrombin times. No patients developed leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. SRL is safe after liver transplantation in patients with acute neurological or renal impairment. SRL is an attractive alternative when calcineurin inhibitors are undesirable, but serum trough levels of SRL should be monitored. A prospective randomized study of an SRL-based calcineurin inhibitor-avoiding regimen compared with standard therapy in patients with renal insufficiency will further evaluate the role for SRL in liver transplantation.

Prolonged cold ischemia time obviates the benefits of 0 HLA mismatches in renal transplantation.

HYPOTHESIS: Recipients of 0 HLA mismatch kidneys with prolonged cold ischemia times of longer than 36 hours do not have superior outcomes compared with recipients of kidneys with 1 or more mismatches. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Transplanation centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 63,688 recipients who underwent transplantation between January 1, 1990, and July 31, 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delayed graft function, serum creatinine level, and patient and renal graft survival. RESULTS: Recipients of 0 HLA mismatch kidneys with fewer than 36 hours of cold ischemia time had better 5-year graft survival (75%) when compared with recipients with 1 or more mismatches (67%) (P<.001). However, recipients of 0 HLA mismatch kidneys with longer than 36 hours of cold ischemia time did not have any graft survival advantage (71% in 0 HLA mismatch kidneys vs 72% in 1 or more mismatches, P =.24). CONCLUSIONS: Cold ischemia times of longer than 36 hours obviate the benefits of better graft survival conferred by better matching.

The effect of age and prolonged cold ischemia times on the national allocation of cadaveric renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: National sharing of cadaveric renal allografts for perfectly matched kidneys (0 antigen mismatch) has improved outcome in the recipients of these kidneys despite increasing cold storage times. However, there may be limits to outcome improvement of matched kidneys based on age and cold storage time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine if national sharing of kidneys based on matching improves outcome regardless of donor age and cold storage time, we evaluated the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Scientific Registry for all recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants between January 1, 1990 and July 31, 1998. We divided the recipients into four groups based on donor age and cold storage time. Group 1 comprised young donors (donor age <55 years) with average (<24 h) cold storage time; group 2, young donors with long (>/=24 h) cold storage time; group 3, older donors (donor age >/=55 years) with average cold storage time; and group 4, older donors with long cold storage time. RESULTS: A total of 64,046 recipients were evaluated: 35,061 (55%) in group 1, 21,264 (33%) in group 2, 4308 (7%) in group 3, and 3414 (5%) in group 4. Early graft performance progressively decreased from group 1 to group 4. Delayed graft function (DGF: dialysis requirement in the first 7 days posttransplant) was 18, 29, 33, and 42% (P < 0.0001); serum creatinine at 3 years (in mg/dl) was 1.70 +/- 0.8, 1.73 +/- 0.9, 2. 31 +/- 1.0, and 2.42 +/- 1.1 (P < 0.0001); 1-year graft survival was 87, 84, 79, and 77% (P < 0.0001); and 3-year graft survival was 77, 74, 63, and 62% (P < 0.0001, for groups 1 and 2 vs groups 3 and 4, respectively). The trends in DGF persisted through the groups in 0 antigen mismatched kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: Early function is adversely affected by prolonged cold storage, despite matching, in recipients of younger and older donor kidneys. Long-term function does not appear to be affected by prolonged cold storage. Recipients of kidneys from donors >/=55 years of age have significantly worse short- and long-term outcome and may not benefit from national sharing.

Flow cytometry crossmatching as a predictor of acute rejection in sensitized recipients of cadaveric renal transplants.

Flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM) was developed as a more sensitive assay than the standard complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) for the detection of anti-donor antibodies, that mediate hyperacute rejection and graft loss in the early post-transplant period in renal transplant recipients. The role of FCXM in predicting long-term clinical outcome in renal allograft recipients is unclear. This study examines the role of FCXM in predicting long-term clinical outcome in highly sensitized recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. All patients (n = 100) with peak panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels > 30%, who received cadaveric renal transplants between 1/1/'90 and 12/31/'95 at our institution, were divided into FCXM + and FCXM - groups. The incidence of acute rejection was determined for each group during the first yr after transplant. Graft survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 yr, and creatinine levels were also compared between groups. FCXM + patients experienced a higher incidence of acute rejection during the first yr after transplant (69 vs. 45%), and a higher percentage of FCXM + patients had more than one episode of acute rejection during the first yr after transplant (34 vs. 8%) when compared to FCXM - patients. There was no statistically significant difference in 1-, 2-, or 3-yr graft survival between FCXM + and FCXM - patients (76 vs. 83, 62 vs. 80, 62 vs. 72%, respectively). These results suggest that sensitized FCXM + cadaveric renal transplant recipients have a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes in the first yr after transplant. Given the association of multiple rejection episodes with poor long-term allograft survival, FCXM may be a useful predictor of long-term clinical outcome in this sub-group of renal transplant recipients.