Effects of anti-osteoporosis therapy on the risk of secondary fractures and surgical complications following surgical fixation of proximal humerus fracture in older people.

BACKGROUND: age-related fragility fractures cause significant burden of disease. Within an ageing society, fracture and complication prevention will be essential to balance health expenditure growth. OBJECTIVE: to assess the effect of anti-osteoporotic therapy on surgical complications and secondary fractures after treatment of fragility fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: retrospective health insurance data from January 2008 to December 2019 of patients ≥65 years with proximal humeral fracture (PHF) treated using locked plate fixation (LPF) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were analysed. Cumulative incidences were calculated by Aalen-Johansen estimates. The influence of osteoporosis and pharmaceutical therapy on secondary fractures and surgical complications were analysed using multivariable Fine and Gray Cox regression models. RESULTS: a total of 43,310 patients (median age 79 years, 84.4% female) with a median follow-up of 40.9 months were included. Five years after PHF, 33.4% of the patients were newly diagnosed with osteoporosis and only 19.8% received anti-osteoporotic therapy. A total of 20.6% (20.1-21.1%) of the patients had at least one secondary fracture with a significant reduction of secondary fracture risk by anti-osteoporotic therapy (P < 0.001). An increased risk for surgical complications (hazard ratio: 1.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-1.47, P < 0.001) after LPF could be reversed by anti-osteoporotic therapy. While anti-osteoporotic therapy was more often used in female patients (35.3 vs 19.1%), male patients showed significantly stronger effects reducing the secondary fracture and surgical complication risk. CONCLUSIONS: a significant number of secondary fractures and surgical complications could be prevented by consequent osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment particularly in male patients. Health-politics and legislation must enforce guideline-based anti-osteoporotic therapy to mitigate burden of disease.

Increased complication rates of salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) after failed locked plate fixation compared with primary RTSA in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

HYPOTHESIS: Common surgical treatment options for proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients include locked plate fixation (LPF) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). It was hypothesized that secondary RTSA after LPF would be associated with higher complication rates and costs compared with primary RTSA. METHODS: We analyzed the health insurance data of patients aged ≥65 years who received RTSA for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture between January 2013 and September 2019 with a pre-study phase of 5 years. Multivariable Cox, logistic, and linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between treatment group and complications, hospital length of stay, charges, and mortality rate during a 34-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 14,220 patients underwent primary RTSA and 1282 patients underwent secondary RTSA after prior surgery using LPF for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. After adjustment for patient characteristics, more surgical complications were observed after secondary RTSA during index hospitalization (odds ratio, 4.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.00-5.34; P < .001) and long-term follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.27-1.81; P < .001). Moreover, secondary RTSA was associated with an increased cumulative total cost of €6638.1 (95% CI, €6229.9-€7046.5; P < .001). If conversion from LPF to secondary RTSA occurred during index hospitalization, more major adverse events, more thromboembolic events, and a higher mortality rate were found in the short and long term (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: Secondary RTSA is associated with higher total costs and more complications. Hence, if surgical treatment of a proximal humeral fracture in an elderly patient is needed, prognostic factors for LPF need to be evaluated carefully. If in doubt, the surgeon should opt to perform primary RTSA as patients will benefit in the long term.

COVID-19 rapid molecular point-of-care testing is effective and cost-beneficial for the acute care of trauma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and cost benefit of a rapid molecular point-of-care testing (POCT) device detecting COVID-19 within a traumatological emergency department. BACKGROUND: Despite continuous withdrawal of COVID-19 restrictions, hospitals will remain particularly vulnerable to local outbreaks which is reflected by a higher institution-specific basic reproduction rate. Patients admitted to the emergency department with unknown COVID-19 infection status due to a- or oligosymptomatic COVID-19 infection put other patients and health care workers at risk, while fast diagnosis and treatment is necessary. Delayed testing results in additional costs to the health care system. METHODS: From the 8th of April 2021 until 31st of December 2021, all patients admitted to the emergency department were tested with routine RT-PCR and rapid molecular POCT device (Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19). COVID-19-related additional costs for patients admitted via shock room or emergency department were calculated based on internal cost allocations. RESULTS: 1133 rapid molecular tests resulted in a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 35.9-99.6%), specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 99.4-100%), a positive predictive value of 71.4% (95% CI 29-96.3%) and a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI 99.5-100%) as compared to RT-PCR. Without rapid COVID-19 testing, each emergency department and shock room admission with subsequent surgery showed additional direct costs of 2631.25€, without surgery of 729.01€. CONCLUSION: Although rapid molecular COVID-19 testing can initially be more expensive than RT-PCR, subsequent cost savings, improved workflows and workforce protection outweigh this effect by far. The data of this study support the use of a rapid molecular POCT device in a traumatological emergency department.

Male Sex Is Associated with Higher Mortality and Increased Risk for Complications after Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures.

AIMS: The best surgical treatment of multi-fragmentary proximal humeral fractures in the elderly is a highly controversial topic. The aim of this study is to assess for sex-related differences regarding mortality and complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and locking plate fixation (LPF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients from the largest German healthcare insurance (26.5 million policy holders) above the age of 65 years that were treated with LPF or RTSA after a multi-fragmentary proximal humerus fracture between January 2010 and September 2018 were included. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the association of sex with overall survival, major adverse events and surgical complications. RESULTS: A total of 8264 (15%) men and 45,707 (85%) women were followed up for a median time of 52 months. After 8 years, male patients showed significantly higher rates for death (65.8%; 95% CI 63.9-67.5% vs. 51.1%; 95% CI 50.3-51.9%; p < 0.001) and major adverse events (75.5%; 95% CI 73.8-77.1% vs. 61.7%; 95% CI 60.9-62.5%; p < 0.001). With regard to surgical complications, after adjustment of patient risk profiles, there were no differences between females and males after LPF (p > 0.05), whereas men showed a significantly increased risk after RTSA (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.56-2.22; p < 0.001) with more revision surgeries performed (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.46-2.12; p < 0.001) compared to women. CONCLUSION: The male sex is an independent risk factor for death and major adverse events after both LPF and RTSA. An increased risk for surgical complications after RTSA suggests that male patients benefit more from LPF. Sex should be considered before making treatment decisions.

Impact of the first COVID-19 shutdown on patient volumes and surgical procedures of a Level I trauma center.

PURPOSE: In Dec 2019, COVID-19 was first recognized and led to a worldwide pandemic. The German government implemented a shutdown in Mar 2020, affecting outpatient and hospital care. The aim of the present article was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 shutdown on patient volumes and surgical procedures of a Level I trauma center in Germany. METHODS: All emergency patients were recorded retrospectively during the shutdown and compared to a calendar-matched control period (CTRL). Total emergency patient contacts including trauma mechanisms, injury patterns and operation numbers were recorded including absolute numbers, incidence proportions and risk ratios. RESULTS: During the shutdown period, we observed a decrease of emergency patient cases (417) compared to CTRL (575), a decrease of elective cases (42 vs. 13) and of the total number of operations (397 vs. 325). Incidence proportions of emergency operations increased from 8.2 to 12.2% (shutdown) and elective surgical cases decreased (11.1 vs. 4.3%). As we observed a decrease for most trauma mechanisms and injury patterns, we found an increasing incidence proportion for severe open fractures. Household-related injuries were reported with an increasing incidence proportion from 26.8 to 47.5% (shutdown). We found an increasing tendency of trauma and injuries related to psychological disorders. CONCLUSION: This analysis shows a decrease of total patient numbers in an emergency department of a Level I trauma center and a decrease of the total number of operations during the shutdown period. Concurrently, we observed an increase of severe open fractures and emergency operations. Furthermore, trauma mechanism changed with less traffic, work and sports-related accidents.