Dose levels in particulate-containing formulations impact anti-drug antibody responses to murine monoclonal antibody in mice.

Dosage levels and particulate contents of therapeutic protein formulations are potential factors that impact immunogenicity of protein therapeutics. Here, we evaluated the effect of dose levels on the immunogenicity of protein particulates formed by adsorbing a murine monoclonal IgG2c/κ antibody (mAb1) onto silicone oil microdroplets, glass, or aluminum hydroxide (Alhydrogel) microparticles. Immune responses to these particulate-containing preparations were compared against responses to solutions of mAb1 that had been ultracentrifuged to minimize particle levels. Formulations containing 5 or 500 µg of adsorbed mAb1 were administered subcutaneously to C57BL/6J or BALB/c mice. Antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were detected using an isotype-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method or a chemiluminescence method. Sera from BALB/c mice showed greater ADA responses to administration of particles at the 5-µg dose level than at the 500-µg dose level. In sera from C57BL/6J mice, ADA levels detected by ELISA were independent of the particle dose levels tested. ADAs were not detected in sera from C57BL/6J mice performing the chemiluminescence technique. In conclusion, mice administered formulations of a murine antibody adsorbed onto silicone oil microdroplets, glass microparticles, or Alhydrogel(®) showed greater ADA responses that those that received particle-free mAb1 preparations, and responses were greater for formulations containing lower doses of antibody. .

Investigation of the immunogenicity of different types of aggregates of a murine monoclonal antibody in mice.

PURPOSE: The potential contribution of protein aggregates to the unwanted immunogenicity of protein pharmaceuticals is a major concern. In the present study a murine monoclonal antibody was utilized to study the immunogenicity of different types of aggregates in mice. Samples containing defined types of aggregates were prepared by processes such as stirring, agitation, exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light and exposure to elevated temperatures. METHODS: Aggregates were analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography, light obscuration, turbidimetry, infrared (IR) spectroscopy and UV spectroscopy. Samples were separated into fractions based on aggregate size by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation or by centrifugation. Samples containing different types and sizes of aggregates were subsequently administered to C57BL/6 J and BALB/c mice, and serum was analyzed for the presence of anti-IgG1, anti-IgG2a, anti-IgG2b and anti-IgG3 antibodies. In addition, the pharmacokinetic profile of the murine antibody was investigated. RESULTS: In this study, samples containing high numbers of different types of aggregates were administered in order to challenge the in vivo system. The magnitude of immune response depends on the nature of the aggregates. The most immunogenic aggregates were of relatively large and insoluble nature, with perturbed, non-native structures. CONCLUSION: This study shows that not all protein drug aggregates are equally immunogenic.