Liquorilactobacillus: A Context of the Evolutionary History and Metabolic Adaptation of a Bacterial Genus from Fermentation Liquid Environments.

In the present work, we carried out a comparative genomic analysis to trace the evolutionary trajectory of the bacterial species that make up the Liquorilactobacillus genus, from the identification of genes and speciation/adaptation mechanisms in their unique characteristics to the identification of the pattern grouping these species. We present phylogenetic relationships between Liquorilactobacillus and related taxa such as Bacillus, basal lactobacilli and Ligilactobacillus, highlighting evolutionary divergences and lifestyle transitions across different taxa. The species of this genus share a core genome of 1023 genes, distributed in all COGs, which made it possible to characterize it as Liquorilactobacillus sensu lato: few amino acid auxotrophy, low genes number for resistance to antibiotics and general and specific cellular reprogramming mechanisms for environmental responses. These species were divided into four clades, with diversity being enhanced mainly by the diversity of genes involved in sugar metabolism. Clade 1 presented lower (< 70%) average amino acid identity with the other clades, with exclusive or absent genes, and greater distance in the genome compared to clades 2, 3 and 4. The data pointed to an ancestor of clades 2, 3 and 4 as being the origin of the genus Ligilactobacillus, while the species of clade 1 being closer to the ancestral Bacillus. All these traits indicated that the species of clade 1 could be soon separated in a distinct genus.

What Differentiates Probiotic from Pathogenic Bacteria? The Genetic Mobility of Enterococcus faecium Offers New Molecular Insights.

Enterococcus faecium is a lactic acid bacterium with applications in food engineering and nutrigenomics, including as starter cultures in fermented foods. To differentiate the E. faecium probiotic from pathogenic bacteria, physiological analyses are often used but they do not guarantee that a bacterial strain is not pathogenic. We report here new findings and an approach based on comparison of the genetic mobility of (1) probiotic, (2) pathogenic, and (3) nonpathogenic and non-probiotic strains, so as to differentiate probiotics, and inform their safe use. The region of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes of different E. faecium strains native to Pernambuco-Brazil was used with the GenBank query sequence. Complete genomes were selected and divided into three groups as noted above to identify the mobile genetic elements (MGEs) (transposase, integrase, conjugative transposon protein and phage) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and to undertake pan-genome analysis and multiple genome alignment. Differences in the number of MGEs were found in ARGs, in the presence and absence of the genes that differentiate E. faecium probiotics and pathogenic bacteria genetically. Our data suggest that genetic mobility appears to be informative in differentiating between probiotic and pathogenic strains. While the present findings are not necessarily applicable to all probiotics, they offer novel molecular insights to guide future research in nutrigenomics, clinical medicine, and food engineering on new ways to differentiate pathogenic from probiotic bacteria.