Decisions about deep brain stimulation therapy in Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease can be treated surgically in patients who present with motor complications such as fluctuations and dyskinesias, or medically-refractory disabling tremor. In this review, a group of specialists formulated suggestions for a preoperative evaluation protocol after reviewing the literature published up to October 2017. In this protocol, eligibility and ineligibility criteria for surgical treatment were suggested, as well as procedures that should be carried out before the multidisciplinary therapeutic decisions. The review emphasizes the need to establish "DBS teams", with professionals dedicated specifically to this area. Finally, surgical target selection (subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus) is discussed briefly, weighing the pros and cons of each target.

Decisions about deep brain stimulation therapy in Parkinson's disease / Decisões a respeito da terapia com estimulação cerebral profunda na doença de Parkinson

ABSTRACT Parkinson's disease can be treated surgically in patients who present with motor complications such as fluctuations and dyskinesias, or medically-refractory disabling tremor. In this review, a group of specialists formulated suggestions for a preoperative evaluation protocol after reviewing the literature published up to October 2017. In this protocol, eligibility and ineligibility criteria for surgical treatment were suggested, as well as procedures that should be carried out before the multidisciplinary therapeutic decisions. The review emphasizes the need to establish "DBS teams", with professionals dedicated specifically to this area. Finally, surgical target selection (subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus) is discussed briefly, weighing the pros and cons of each target.

RESUMO A doença de Parkinson pode ser tratada cirurgicamente em pacientes que desenvolveram complicações motoras, como flutuações e discinesias, ou tremores refratários ao uso de medicação. Nesta revisão, um grupo de especialistas formulou sugestões para um protocolo de avaliação pré-operatória, depois de revisar a literatura publicada até outubro de 2017. Neste protocolo, são sugeridos critérios de elegibilidade e inadmissibilidade para tratamento cirúrgico, bem como procedimentos que devem ser realizados antes das decisões terapêuticas multidisciplinares. A revisão enfatiza a necessidade de estabelecer "equipes de DBS", com profissionais dedicados especialmente a esta área. Ao final, a seleção do alvo cirúrgico (núcleo subtalâmico ou globo pálido interno) é discutida brevemente, ponderando prós e contras de cada escolha.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Painful Mononeuropathy Secondary to Leprosy: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.

OBJECTIVE: Leprosy affects approximately 10-15 million patients worldwide and remains a relevant public health issue. Chronic pain secondary to leprosy is a primary cause of morbidity, and its treatment remains a challenge. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for painful mononeuropathy secondary to leprosy that is refractory to pharmacological therapy and surgical intervention (decompression). METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013 twenty-three patients with painful mononeuropathy secondary to leprosy were recruited to this prospective case series. All patients were considered to be refractory to optimized conservative treatment and neurosurgical decompression. Pain was evaluated over the course of the study using the neuropathic pain scale and the visual analog scale for pain. In the first stage, patients were implanted with a temporary electrode that was connected to an external stimulator, and were treated with PNS for seven days. Patients with 50% or greater pain relief received a definitive implantation in the second stage. Follow-ups in the second stage were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: After seven days of trial in the first stage, 10 patients showed a pain reduction of 50% or greater. At 12-month follow-up in the second stage, 6 of the 10 patients who underwent permanent device implantation showed a pain reduction of 50% or greater (75% reduction on average), and two patients showed a 30% reduction in pain. Two patients presented with electrode migration that required repositioning during the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that PNS might have significant long-term utility for the treatment of painful mononeuropathy secondary to leprosy. Future studies should be performed in order to corroborate our findings in a larger population and encourage the clinical implementation of this technique.

Estimulação de nervos periféricos no tratamento das síndromes dolorosas crônicas / Peripheral nerve stimulation to treat chronic painful syndromes

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O uso da estimulação elétrica de nervos periféricos para o tratamento da dor crônica constitui um armamentário neurocirúrgico utilizado há bastante tempo, sendo uma modalidade indicada no tratamento das síndromes dolorosas de caráter neuropático, juntamente com outras formas de neuroestimulação: estimulação elétrica da coluna dorsal e a estimulação cerebral profunda. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a relevância da estimulação nervosa periférica no tratamento das síndromes dolorosas crônicas. CONTEÚDO: A principal indicação é a dor neuropática crônica, intensa, refratária ao tratamento conservador. Apresenta, contudo, necessidade de a área acometida ter uma distribuição anatômica definida e relacionada ao nervo periférico no qual se deseja realizar a estimulação. Deve-se perceber também sinais de comprometimentoobjetivo do nervo. É necessária a realização de teste de neuroestimulação entre 7 e 10 dias previamente ao implante definitivo e deve-se obter melhora de pelo menos 50% da dor em escalas de avaliação específicas. Existem duas formas de implante de eletrodo em nervos periféricos: abordagem cirúrgica direta e técnica percutânea. Após o teste ser completado, é realizado o implante do sistema de gerador permanente. CONCLUSÃO: O uso da estimulação de nervos periféricos no tratamento das síndromes dolorosas crônicas tem mostrado resultados promissores. O desenvolvimento de novos materiais é extremamente necessário para a evolução da técnica e o tratamento dessas síndromes dolorosas crônicas. Nesse sentido, novas próteses estão sendo desenvolvidas e uma das características de implante mais viável para uso no sistema nervoso periférico seria uma prótese de baixo perfil, com bateria já implantada com os eletrodos e recarregável.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peripheral nerve stimulation to treat chronic pain is a neurosurgical armamentarium used for a long time, being indicated to treat neuropathic painful syndromes together with other types of nerve stimulation: dorsal column electric stimulation and deep cerebral stimulation. This study aimed at analyzing the relevance of peripheral nerve stimulation to treat chronic painful syndromes. CONTENTS: Primary indication is severe chronic neuropathic pain refractory to conservative treatment. However, the affected area needs to have a defined anatomic distribution and related to the peripheral nerve to be stimulated. One should also notice signs of objective involvement of the nerve. A nerve stimulation test shall be performed from 7 to 10 days prior to the final implant and pain must improve at least 50% according to specific evaluation scales. There are two methods to implant electrodes in peripheral nerves: direct surgical approach and percutaneous technique. After the test, the implant with permanent generator is performed. CONCLUSION: Peripheral nerve stimulation to treat chronic painful syndromes has shown promising results. The development of new materials is extremely necessary for the technical evolution and treatment of chronic painful syndromes. In this sense, new prostheses are being developed and one feature of a more feasible implant to be used in the peripheral nervous system would be low profile prosthesis with already implanted and rechargeable battery.

Treatment of severe trigeminal headache in patients with pituitary adenomas.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of headache in patients with pituitary adenomas is high, and the underlying pathological mechanisms are not completely understood. OBJECTIVE: We tested the efficacy of percutaneous ganglion block and trigeminal rhizotomy in the treatment of severe trigeminal/autonomic headache associated with pituitary tumors. METHODS: Eleven patients treated surgically for pituitary adenomas in whom intractable trigeminal headaches developed were enrolled in the study and underwent ictal cerebral single-photon emission computed tomography before starting treatment. Initially, all patients underwent a 6-month medical treatment trial. Patients who did not experience improvement in headache severity, addressed by the Headache Impact Test-6 scale, underwent trigeminal percutaneous ganglion blockade. Two patients subsequently underwent trigeminal balloon rhizotomy. RESULTS: Among the 11 patients, 6 did not have improved Headache Impact Test-6 scale scores after 6 months of treatment with medications and underwent trigeminal ganglion blockade. Significant improvement in headache severity was noted in 3 of them. Long-term response was obtained in 1 patient, and the other 2, in whom the response was transient, were then successfully treated with trigeminal rhizotomy. Cerebral single-photon emission computed tomography showed increased uptake in the thalamus/hypothalamus region in patients who responded well to manipulation of the trigeminal-hypothalamic system. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ganglion blockade and trigeminal rhizotomy may be promising alternative options for the treatment of severe headache in selected patients with pituitary adenomas.