Point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin-I analysis in capillary blood for acute coronary syndrome diagnostics.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should be referred promptly to the hospital to reduce mortality and morbidity. Differentiating between low-risk and high-risk patients remains a diagnostic challenge. Point-of-care testing can contribute to earlier disposition decisions for patients excluded from ACS. This study describes the validation of the Atellica® VTLi. Patient-side Immunoassay Analyzer for high-sensitivity troponin point-of-care (POC) analysis. (The Atellica VTLi is not available for sale in the USA. The products/features (mentioned herein) are not commercially available in all countries. Their future availability cannot be guaranteed). METHODS: A total of 152 patients with acute chest pain admitted at the cardiac emergency department (ED) were included in the study. Capillary blood was compared with a whole blood and plasma sample obtained by venipuncture. All samples were analyzed using the Atellica VTLi Patient-side Immunoassay Analyzer; in addition, plasma was analyzed by a central lab immunoassay analyzer. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between venous whole blood vs. plasma analyzed by the Atellica VTLi Patient-side Immunoassay Analyzer. The difference between capillary blood and venous blood showed a constant bias of 7.1%, for which a correction factor has been implemented. No clinically relevant differences were observed for the capillary POC results compared to plasma analyzed with a standard immunoassay analyzer. CONCLUSIONS: The Atellica VTLi Patient-side Immunoassay Analyzer for high-sensitivity troponin analysis shows equivalent results for all sample types, including capillary blood. No clinically relevant discordances were observed between capillary POC and central laboratory results. With additional studies, this could pave the way towards rapid testing of high-sensitivity troponin in the ambulance or the general practitioner's office without the need for hospitalization of patients with acute chest pain.

Point-of-Care: Roadmap for Analytical Characterization and Validation of a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assay in Plasma and Whole Blood Matrices.

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays enable more precise use of traditional diagnostic strategies and earlier rule-out/rule-in at 0/1 h or 0/2 h after presentation of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Availability of hs-cTn measurements at point-of-care (POC) can improve timely management of AMI patients. A roadmap for regulatory and analytical validation is exemplified with studies with the Atellica VTLi hs-cTnI at POC. METHODS: High-sensitivity performance was assessed with AACC/IFCC expert recommendations. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute protocols were used for characterizing limit of blank, limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantitation (LoQ), 10% CV, precision, linearity, and analytic specificity with several reagent lots. Bland-Altman, Passing-Bablok, and hematocrit bias plots compared hs-cTnI measurement in lithium-heparin plasma (PL) and whole blood (WB) matrices. RESULTS: LoB was 0.55 ng/L; LoD and LoQ were 1.24 ng/L and 2.1 ng/Lm for PL and 1.60 ng/L and 3.7 ng/L for WB, respectively. The male 99th percentile is 27 ng/L, and female 99th percentile upper reference limit is 18 ng/L; 10% CVs were 6.7 ng/L for PL and 8.9 ng/L for WB. Also ≥50% of hs-cTnI values for healthy cohorts exceeded the LoD, confirming high-sensitivity performance. Linearity spanned from LoQ to 1250 ng/L. Specificity was >90% for 40 potential interferences; no hook effect was detected. WB and PL correlation was WB = 1.02*plasma + 0.3 ng/L (r = 0.996, n = 152). No hs-cTnI association with hematocrit was detected (R2 = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This analytical roadmap showed high-sensitivity performance, good analytic characteristics, and excellent PL and WB agreement for the Atellica VTLi hs-cTnI POC system. Essential clinical performance studies in patients by intended POC users may now commence.

Aesthetic outcome and complications of simple interrupted versus running subcuticular sutures in facial surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The suturing technique and its associated complications could affect cosmetic outcome after facial surgery. Literature on this topic is limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cosmetic results 12 months after treatment and complications associated with simple interrupted sutures (SIS) versus running subcuticular sutures (RSS) in facial surgery. METHODS: A randomized, controlled multicenter trial was performed. Adults receiving dermatologic surgery on the face were randomized to receive SIS or RSS for wound closure. The primary outcome was the overall opinion score on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the complication rates and scores according to alternative methods for assessment of cosmetic outcome. The observer of cosmetic outcome was blinded to treatment assignment. RESULTS: 142 patients were randomized to receive SIS (n = 73) or RSS (n = 69). Twelve months after surgery, the median score of the overall opinion on the POSAS was 2.0 (range 1-8) according to the patients and 3.0 (range 1-8) according to the observer in both groups. In the RSS group, hyper- or hypoesthesia was reported more often. LIMITATIONS: The cosmetic result was assessed by 1 observer. CONCLUSION: SIS and RSS in facial surgery resulted in comparable cosmetic outcomes. RSS was more often associated with hyper- or hypoesthesia.