Oncological Outcome of Node-Positive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas Treated With Selective and Comprehensive Neck Dissection.

Selective neck dissection (SND) is the treatment of choice in patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) and clinically node-negative necks (cN0). The treatment of patients with positive-staged necks (cN+) includes SND as well as comprehensive neck dissection (CND). The clear benefit of one or the other remains under debate. We aim to address this lack of clarity by analysing patients with OSCC staged with clinically node-positive necks, treated with either CND or SND using a level-by-level approach. This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OSCC with clinically (cN+) and pathologically (pN+) positive cervical lymph nodes (LNs) with clear neck level categorization during the years 2010-2019. In total, 74 patients were analysed. Cox regression analysis found no significance for the type of ND being an independent risk factor, neither for overall survival (OS) nor for disease-free survival (DFS). Regional recurrence of CND cases (5.77%) was comparable to SND cases (9.09%). For OS, extracapsular spread (ECS) and male sex were identified as independent risk factors with poorer outcome. pT-stage and ECS were found to be independent risk factors for DFS. The results of this study suggest that both CND and SND may be viable treatment options for certain patients with OSCC pN+.

Management of the Contralateral Neck in Unilateral Node-Positive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: In lateralized oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with ipsilateral cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM), the surgical management of the unsuspicious contralateral neck remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to analyze this cohort and to compare the outcomes of patients with and without contralateral elective neck dissection (END). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with lateralized OSCC, ipsilateral CLNM (pN+) and contralateral cN0-stage was performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical management of the contralateral neck: I: END; and II: no END performed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was applied bilaterally in both groups according to individual risk. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (group I: 16 (24.6%); group II: 49 (75.4%)) with a median follow-up of 28 months were included. Initially, there was no case of contralateral CLNM after surgery. During follow-up, 6 (9.2%) patients presented with recurrent CLNM. In 5 of these cases (7.7%), the contralateral neck (group I: 3/16 (18.8%); group II: 2/49 (4.1%)) was affected. Increased ipsilateral lymph node ratio was associated with contralateral CLNM (p = 0.07). END of the contralateral side showed no significant benefit regarding OS (p = 0.59) and RFS (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the risk for occult contralateral CLNM in patients with lateralized OSCC ipsilateral CLNM is low. Our data suggest that END should not be performed routinely in this cohort. Risk-adapted radiotherapy of the contralateral neck alone seems to be sufficient from the oncological point of view.

Prognostic value of lymph node involvement in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Different parameters have been identified in patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) that have a serious impact on survival, including residual tumour and extracapsular spread. Moreover, other factors, including the lymph node ratio (LNR) and lymph node yield (LNY), have been suggested as prognostic markers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OSCC and cervical lymph node metastases during the years 2010-2020. Patients' records were evaluated regarding lymph node status, final therapy regime, tumour recurrence, time to death, tumour association with death, disease-free survival (DSF), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In 242 patients with a mean age of 63.57 ± 11.24 years, treated either by selective neck dissection (SND; n = 70) or by modified radical neck dissection (MRND; n = 172), 5772 lymph nodes were detected. The LNR and LNY were identified as independent risk factors in OS and DFS. The optimal cut-off point for the LNY was ≥ 17 lymph nodes in the SND and ≥ 27 lymph nodes in the MRND group. The metastatic lymph node clearance (MLNC) was established as a score to relate the LNR and LNY to the extent of lymph node removal. Survival analysis showed statistically significant differences among score levels. CONCLUSIONS: As information about the extent of nodal dissection is excluded from LNR and LNY, we propose the use of a new scoring system comprising individual cut-off values for LNY and LNR with regard to the extent of neck dissection. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: MLNC might help to identify high-risk OSCC patients with metastatic lymph nodes.