Routine postoperative upper gastroesophageal imaging is unnecessary after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Routine early postoperative upper gastroesophageal imaging (UGI) is often used in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures to confirm anastomotic patency and to exclude leaks. The aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of this practice. From January 2003 to November 2004, 322 LRYGB cases were performed using linear staplers for the gastrojejunostomy and jejuno-jejunostomy anastomoses. As part of our protocol, all patients received a Gastrograffin (Mallinkrodt, Inc., St Louis, Missouri) UGI on postoperative Day 1. The same radiological techniques were used and the same radiological team reviewed all films. Abnormal films were identified. In addition, patient demographics, time to discharge, and complications were collected and analyzed in a prospective database. There were no anastomotic leaks or obstructions. However, 42 of 322 (13%) studies demonstrated delayed gastric emptying. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with normal and delayed UGI studies. Routine UGI studies did not contribute significantly to patient care, and its routine use was subsequently abandoned.

Antecolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is not associated with higher complication rates.

Since its introduction in 1994, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has rapidly gained popularity for the treatment of morbid obesity. Historically, the operation is performed in a retrocolic fashion; however antecolic LRYGB has been advocated as a safe alternative. We reviewed our experience with both techniques. From January 2003 to November 2004, the new UCLA Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Program performed 341 LRYGBs. In March 2004, our program transitioned from a retrocolic to an antecolic approach for all gastric bypass procedures. Institutional review board approval was obtained, and the data for all patients was collected into a prospective database. The patient characteristics for the two groups were similar. The significant differences between the two groups were average body mass index and the percentage of patients with diabetes and sleep apnea. The complication profiles for the two groups were also similar. There were significant differences between the two groups in the reoperation rate, antecolic 2.0 per cent versus retrocolic 7.8 per cent, and length of stay, antecolic 2.57 versus retrocolic 2.89 days. There were no anastomotic leaks or deaths in either group. Antecolic LRYGB is safe and may be associated with fewer complications. Only long-term weight loss results and complication rates will provide a definitive answer.

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men, after lung cancer. Traditionally, the traumatic open radical prostatectomy procedure was the only treatment option available. Although nerve-sparing techniques have evolved, the development of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has been one of the most significant changes in surgical treatment of the disease. Like many minimally invasive abdominal procedures, LRP reduces trauma, resulting in less postoperative pain, reduced length of hospital stay, and more rapid return to normal activity when compared to open radical prostatectomy. This article describes the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of a patient undergoing LRP. It is anticipated that LRP will be the future standard for treatment of prostate cancer that requires radical surgery.