Inpatient or Outpatient: Does Initial Disposition Affect Outcomes in Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures?

Background The repair of trimalleolar fractures can be challenging for surgeons and may be managed as an inpatient or an outpatient. However, it is often unclear whether these patients should be admitted immediately or sent home from the emergency department (ED). This study aims to evaluate trimalleolar fractures treated surgically in the inpatient or outpatient settings to evaluate differences in outcomes for these patients. Methods A retrospective chart review of 223 patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation of a trimalleolar ankle fracture was performed from January 2015 to August 2022. Patients were classified by whether the fixation was performed as an inpatient or outpatient. Outcomes of interest included time from injury to surgery, complications, ED returns, and readmissions within 90 days. Results Inpatients had significantly higher ASA scores, BMI, and rates of comorbidities. Inpatient treatment was associated with faster time to surgery (median 2.0 vs. 9.0 days) and fewer delayed surgeries more than seven days from injury (18.4 vs. 67.9%). There were no differences in complications, 90-day ED returns, readmissions, or reoperation between groups. Conclusions Inpatient admission of patients presenting with trimalleolar ankle fractures resulted in faster time to surgery and fewer surgical delays than outpatient surgery. Despite having more preoperative risk factors, inpatients experienced similar postoperative outcomes as patients discharged home to return for outpatient surgery. Less restrictive admission criteria may improve the patient experience by providing more patients with support and pain control in the hospital setting while decreasing the time to surgery.

Addressing Barriers to Timely Orthopaedic Follow-up for Foot and Ankle Fractures After Emergency Department Visits.

INTRODUCTION: Foot and ankle fractures present common challenges in emergency departments, warranting careful follow-up protocols for optimal patient outcomes. This study investigates the predictors of orthopaedic follow-up for these injuries after an emergency department (ED) visit. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of 1450 patients seen in the ED with foot or ankle fractures from July 2015 to February 2023 was conducted. All included patients were discharged with instructions to follow-up with an orthopaedic provider. Demographic data, fracture details, and follow-up patterns were extracted from medical records. Social vulnerability was assessed using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of follow-up. A subgroup analysis comparing patients who followed up >7 days from ED presentation (ie, delayed follow-up) to those who followed up within 7 days of presentation was then performed. Statistical significance was assessed at P < .05. RESULTS: Overall, 974/1450 (67.2%) patients followed up with orthopaedics at an average time of 4.16 days. After risk adjustment, Medicaid coverage (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, P = .018), increased overall social vulnerability (OR = 0.83, P = .032), and increased vulnerability across the dimensions of socioeconomic status (P = .002), household characteristics (P = .034), racial and ethnic minority status (P = .007), and household type and transportation (P = .032) were all associated with lower odds of follow-up. Phalangeal fractures were also associated with decreased odds of follow-up (OR = 0.039, P < .001), whereas ankle fractures were more likely to follow-up (OR = 1.52, P = .002). In the subgroup analysis, patients of older age (P = .008), non-white race (P = .024), motor vehicle accident (MVA) (P = .027) or non-private insurance (P = .027), those experiencing phalangeal fractures (P = .015), and those seen by an orthopaedic provider in the ED (P = .006) were more likely to present with delayed follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients with increased social vulnerability and Medicaid insurance are less likely to seek follow-up care after presentation to the ED with foot and ankle fractures.

Transosseous Fixation of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: Comparison of Interosseous Suture and Endobutton Across Age Groups.

Background In the ankle, suture bridge fixation for syndesmotic injuries is commonly employed. Initial recommendations for suture bridge constructs advised against using the device in patients with insufficient quantity or quality of bone. Therefore, many surgeons limit its use to younger, more athletic patients and use traditional screw fixation in older, less active patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of suture bridge fixation for syndesmotic repair in patients ≥ 60 years old vs patients < 60 years old. Methods A retrospective review of 140 ankle fracture patients from a single institution who received suture bridge fixation between July 13, 2010, and February 2, 2022, was performed. Patient data was obtained from patient records in the electronic health record. Univariate analysis, including chi-square and independent t-tests, was used. Complications included delayed wound healing, infection, hardware loosening, and non-union. Results There were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, primary or other procedures, loss of fixation, and neuropathy between groups. There was also no difference within the distribution of the mechanism of injury, affected side, or Weber classification. Finally, the rate of complication and complication type showed no significant differences between patients 60 years and older versus 60 years and younger. Complication rates and types in patients > 60 years versus < 60 years were not significantly different. Conclusion The use of the suture bridge fixation in patients > 60 years may not lead to an increased risk of complications and appears to be safe for use.

Postoperative venous thromboembolism risk-prediction in foot and ankle fracture surgery.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) are rare but serious complications after foot and ankle fracture surgery. A consensus definition of a high-risk patient has not been reached, leading to significant variability in the use of pharmacologic agents for VTE prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to develop a model for predicting VTE risk in patients undergoing surgery for foot and ankle fractures that is usable and scalable in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective review of 15,342 patients, within the ACS-NSQIP database, who had undergone surgical repair of foot and ankle fractures from 2015 to 2019 was performed. Univariate analysis evaluated differences in demographics and comorbidities. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was generated based on a 60 % development cohort to evaluate risk factors for VTE. A receiver operator curve based on the 40 % test cohort calculated area under the curve (AUC) to measure the accuracy of the model in predicting VTE within the 30-day postoperative period. RESULTS: Of the 15,342 patients, 1.2 % patients experienced VTE, and 98.8 % patients did not. Patients who experienced VTE were significantly older and had an overall higher comorbidity burden. Those who had VTE spent on average 10.5 more minutes in the operating room. In the final model, age over 65, diabetes, dyspnea, CHF, dialysis, wound infection and bleeding disorders were all found to be significant predictors of VTE after controlling for all other factors. The model generated an AUC of 0.731, indicating good predictive accuracy. The predictive model is publicly available at https://shinyapps.io/VTE_Prediction/. CONCLUSIONS: In alignment with previous studies, we identified increased age and bleeding disorders as independent risk factors for VTE after foot and ankle fracture surgery. This is one of the first studies to generate and test a model for identifying patients at risk for VTE in this population. This evidence-based model may help surgeons prospectively identify high-risk patients who may benefit from pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis.

Perioperative Opioid Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most commonly performed outpatient orthopaedic procedures, yet there is little data about perioperative opioid prescribing practices. The purposes of this study were to quantify the perioperative opioid prescriptions filled by patients who underwent ACLR and to identify factors associated with greater postoperative opioid use. Patients who underwent ACLR at a single institution between June 2015 and May 2017 were studied using a regional prescription monitoring database to identify all preoperative and postoperative outpatient opioid prescriptions up to 2 years postoperatively. The number of morphine milligram equivalents of each opioid was calculated to determine total morphine milligram equivalents (TMEs) filled preoperatively, at discharge, and refilled postoperatively. Patients who refilled an opioid prescription postoperatively were compared with those who did not. Ninety-nine of 269 (36.8%) total patients refilled an opioid prescription postoperatively. Thirty-three patients (12.3%) required a refill after 2 weeks postoperatively, and no patients refilled after 21 months postoperatively. Fifty-seven patients (21%) received an opioid prescription in the 2 years following surgery that was unrelated to their ACL reconstruction. Increased age, higher body mass index (BMI), government insurance, current or prior tobacco use history, preoperative opioid use, and greater number of medical comorbidities were significantly associated with refilling a prescription opioid. Higher BMI and government insurance were independent predictors of refilling. Higher preoperative TMEs and surgeon were independent predictor of greater refill TMEs. In the opioid-naïve subgroup of 177 patients, only higher BMI was a predictor of refilling, and only greater comorbidities was a predictor of greater refill TMEs. The results demonstrate that preoperative opioid use was associated with postoperative opioid refills and higher refill TMEs in a dose-dependent fashion. A higher percentage of patients received an opioid prescription for reasons unrelated to the ACL reconstruction than refilled a prescription after the first 2 weeks postoperatively.

Early Failure of the Paragon28 Phantom Hindfoot Fusion Nail: A Case Report.

CASE: Tibio-talar-calaneal fusion nails can be used to treat acute ankle fractures in patients with diabetes, Charcot arthropathy, or other comorbidities. Recently, Paragon28 released the Phantom Hindfoot Fusion Nail (Phantom nail) with a unique design feature-a proximal coil. We present a case of an ankle fracture-dislocation in a diabetic patient treated with the Paragon28 nail who experienced early implant failure. CONCLUSION: It is important for surgeons to understand that the proximal coil in the Phantom nail should not be considered part of the working length of the nail and may introduce a stress riser that may lead to early implant failure.