Providing a Safe Haven: Staff Response to a Simulated Infant Relinquishment in the Emergency Department.

Every state in the United States has established laws that allow an unharmed newborn to be relinquished to personnel in a safe haven, such as hospital emergency departments, without legal penalty to the parents. These Safe Haven, Baby Moses, or Safe Surrender laws are in place so that mothers in crisis can safely and legally relinquish their babies at a designated location where they can be protected and given medical care until a permanent home can be found. It is important for health care professionals to know about and understand their state's law and how to respond should an infant be surrendered at their facility. No articles were found in the peer-reviewed literature that describe a method to evaluate nurse competency during infant relinquishment at a Safe Haven location. This article will describe commonalities and differences among these Safe Haven Laws, responsibilities of the hospital and staff receiving a relinquished infant, and 1 hospital's experience when running an infant relinquishment drill in their emergency department.

Combining regional expertise to form a bereavement support alliance.

Providing compassionate bereavement care for families experiencing perinatal loss is a standard of care in most healthcare organizations. In this article, we describe the development of The Alliance of Perinatal Bereavement Support Facilitators, begun over 25 years ago in Chicago by staff who identified the need to reach out to colleagues at other area institutions for advice and support in this work. This collaboration created a regional support network that has resulted in a long-lasting, active, sustainable organization of excellence focused on enhancing practice, education, and perinatal bereavement care. Alliance activities center around four main areas: education, networking/support, policy, and recognizing outstanding service to families. By continuing to draw upon the collective talent, wisdom, and expertise of its members, The Alliance still serves grieving families and provides mentoring for future interdisciplinary team members engaged in this work. The path taken to build this organization can be used by professionals in other specialties who are looking to create their own alliance infrastructure based on mutual benefit and interest.

Axillary temperatures in full-term newborn infants: using evidence to guide safe and effective practice.

PURPOSE: Although the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend obtaining temperature in newborn infants via the axilla, controversy still exists whether to obtain rectal or axillary temperatures. Of concern is the risk of perforating the rectum or colon during rectal temperature-taking. The purpose of this study was to explore the accuracy of electronic thermometer measuring temperature in the axilla compared with the rectum in full-term newborn infants. DESIGN: This was an agreement study involving a purposive sample of newborn infants who were greater than 37 weeks' gestation. The general care nursery was located in a large, urban Midwestern academic medical center, and data collection occurred between May 2010 and August 2010. METHODS: On admission to the general care nursery, both axillary and rectal temperatures were taken using the FasTemp device by Filac Electronic. Axillary temperatures were taken first, followed immediately by rectal temperature. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and scatter plots were computed. RESULTS: In 69 newborns, the mean difference between rectal and left axilla temperatures was 0.23°C. There was a significant correlation between rectal temperature and the body temperature for the left axilla (r = 0.786; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data support the use of left axillary temperature measurement in the full-term newborn infant in the first few days of life to provide a safe and accurate alternative to rectal temperatures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nurses caring for newborn infants now have evidence showing that temperature-taking in the left axilla is an alternative to using rectal temperatures, possibly minimizing discomfort and potential risk of perforation.