Factors associated with high 24-month persistence with denosumab: results of a real-world, non-interventional study of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium.

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy is vital for fracture prevention. This non-interventional study of postmenopausal women receiving denosumab in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium found that persistence with denosumab remains consistently high after 24 months in patients at high risk of fracture. PURPOSE: Continued persistence with osteoporosis therapy is vital for fracture prevention. This non-interventional study of clinical practice evaluated medication-taking behavior of postmenopausal women receiving denosumab in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium and factors influencing persistence. METHODS: Subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) was assigned according to prescribing information and local guidelines before and independently of enrollment; outcomes were recorded during routine practice for up to 24 months. Persistence was defined as receiving the subsequent injection within 6 months + 8 weeks of the previous injection and adherence as administration of subsequent injections within 6 months ± 4 weeks of the previous injection. Medication coverage ratio (MCR) was calculated as the proportion of time a patient was covered by denosumab. Associations between pre-specified baseline covariates and 24-month persistence were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The 24-month analyses included 1479 women (mean age 66.3-72.5 years) from 140 sites; persistence with denosumab was 75.1-86.0%, adherence 62.9-70.1%, and mean MCR 87.4-92.4%. No covariate had a significant effect on persistence across all four countries. For three countries, a recent fall decreased persistence; patients were generally older with chronic medical conditions. In some countries, other covariates (e.g., older age, comorbidity, immobility, and prescribing reasons) decreased persistence. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 2.3-6.9% patients. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four-month persistence with denosumab is consistently high among postmenopausal women in Europe and may be influenced by patient characteristics. Further studies are needed to identify determinants of low persistence.

Persistence, adherence, and medication-taking behavior in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium: 12-month results from a European non-interventional study.

UNLABELLED: Persistence with and adherence to osteoporosis therapy are critical for fracture reduction. This non-interventional study is evaluating medication-taking behavior of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) receiving denosumab in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium. Patients were representative of the PMO population and highly persistent with and adherent to denosumab at 12 months. INTRODUCTION: Persistence with and adherence to osteoporosis therapy are important for optimal treatment efficacy, namely fracture reduction. This ongoing, non-interventional study will evaluate medication-taking behavior of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) receiving denosumab in routine practice in four European countries. METHODS: The study enrolled women who had been prescribed subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) in accordance with prescribing information and local guidelines. Persistence was defined as receiving the subsequent injection within 6 months + 8 weeks of the previous injection. Adherence was defined as receiving two consecutive injections within 6 months ± 4 weeks of each other. Medication coverage ratio (MCR) was calculated using the time a patient was covered with denosumab, as assessed from prescription records. Treatment was assigned prior to and independently of enrollment; outcomes are recorded during routine practice. RESULTS: These planned 12-month interim analyses included data from 1500 patients from 141 sites. Mean age was 66.4-72.4 years, mean baseline total hip T-scores ranged from -2.0 to -2.1 and femoral neck T-scores from -2.2 to -2.6, and 30.7-62.1% of patients had prior osteoporotic fracture. Persistence was 87.0-95.3%, adherence 82.7-89.3%, and MCR 91.3-95.4%. In a univariate analysis, increased age, decreased mobility, and increased distance to the clinic were associated with significantly decreased persistence; parental history of hip fracture was associated with significantly increased persistence. CONCLUSIONS: These data extend the real-world evidence regarding persistence with and adherence to denosumab, both of which are critical for favorable clinical outcomes, including fracture risk reduction.

Effects of strontium ranelate and alendronate on bone microstructure in women with osteoporosis. Results of a 2-year study.

UNLABELLED: Strontium ranelate appears to influence more than alendronate distal tibia bone microstructure as assessed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), and biomechanically relevant parameters as assessed by micro-finite element analysis (µFEA), over 2 years, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. INTRODUCTION: Bone microstructure changes are a target in osteoporosis treatment to increase bone strength and reduce fracture risk. METHODS: Using HR-pQCT, we investigated the effects on distal tibia and radius microstructure of strontium ranelate (SrRan; 2 g/day) or alendronate (70 mg/week) for 2 years in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. This exploratory randomized, double-blind trial evaluated HR-pQCT and FEA parameters, areal bone mineral density (BMD), and bone turnover markers. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population (n = 83, age: 64 ± 8 years; lumbar T-score: -2.8 ± 0.8 [DXA]), distal tibia Cortical Thickness (CTh) and Density (DCort), and cancellous BV/TV increased by 6.3%, 1.4%, and 2.5%, respectively (all P < 0.005), with SrRan, but not with alendronate (0.9%, 0.4%, and 0.8%, NS) (P < 0.05 for all above between-group differences). Difference for CTh evaluated with a distance transformation method was close to significance (P = 0.06). The estimated failure load increased with SrRan (+2.1%, P < 0.005), not with alendronate (-0.6%, NS) (between-group difference, P < 0.01). Cortical stress was lower with SrRan (P < 0.05); both treatments decreased trabecular stress. At distal radius, there was no between-group difference other than DCort (P < 0.05). Bone turnover markers decreased with alendronate; bALP increased (+21%) and serum-CTX-I decreased (-1%) after 2 years of SrRan (between-group difference at each time point for both markers, P < 0.0001). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Within the constraints of HR-pQCT method, and while a possible artefactual contribution of strontium cannot be quantified, SrRan appeared to influence distal tibia bone microstructure and FEA-determined biomechanical parameters more than alendronate. However, the magnitude of the differences is unclear and requires confirmation with another method.

Bone health and fracture rate in individuals with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1).

BACKGROUND: Patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) are shorter than expected and often have low bone mineral density (BMD), but the pathogenesis of these bony problems is poorly understood. METHODS: We performed an exploratory study of BMD, 18 laboratory measures of bone metabolism, and fracture history in 72 adult NF1 patients. RESULTS: Eight of the 18 clinical biochemical measures of bone health had at least 10% of NF1 patients outside the standard reference range. Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations were low in 56% of the NF1 patients, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations were high in 34%, and urine deoxypyridinoline cross-link concentrations were high in 50%. Mean serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations were significantly lower in people with NF1 than in season matched controls in both summer (p = 0.008) and winter (p<0.001). 36 (50%) of the 72 people with NF1 studied had BMD consistent with osteopenia, and 14 (19%) had BMD consistent with osteoporosis. High serum PTH concentration, high serum bone tartrate resistant acid phosphatase concentration, and high serum calcium concentration were associated with lower BMD among the NF1 patients. Males were more likely than females to have low BMD. The reported frequency of fractures in individuals with NF1 was much higher than in their unaffected siblings and spouses (p<0.001), and pathological fractures were reported only in NF1 patients. CONCLUSION: People with NF1 often have a generalised abnormality of bone metabolism. Further studies are needed to determine the biochemical and molecular basis of this abnormality.

[Phosphate deficiency as a rare cause of osteomalacia--case report of several years of enteral feeding and antacid therapy]. / Phosphatmangel als seltene Ursache einer Osteomalazie--Fallbericht einer mehrjährigen enteralen Sondenernährung und Antazidatherapie.

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: Floor-of-the-mouth cancer had been diagnosed and surgically treated in a 55-year-old man 4 years before the latest admission. For the last 3 years he had been fed through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Since then he had experienced reflux oesophagitis which was being treated with aluminium-containing antacids. He was hospitalized for the surgical treatment of bilateral fractures of the neck of the femur. A surgical biopsy revealed osteomalacia but no metastasis. INVESTIGATIONS: The serum phosphate level was significantly reduced (0.21 mmol/l) and there was no detectable phosphate excretion in the 24-hour urine. Serum calcium concentration was unremarkable, but there was hypercalciuria (34.4 mmol/d). Alkaline phosphate activity was significantly raised (393 U/l) and parathormone level reduced (7 ng/l). Vitamin D concentration was unremarkable. TREATMENT AND COURSE: The phosphate content in the parenteral feed was at first increased and additional phosphate was given by mouth. The calcium and phosphate levels slowly became normal only after medication had been changed from antacids to H2-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: In this case osteomalacia was caused not by vitamin D deficiency but by a lack of phosphate. The reduced intestinal phosphate absorption by the antacids only partially explains the pronounced clinical signs. If antacids are taken over long periods the phosphate balance should be carefully monitored to avoid osteomalacia.