Fortified Donor Human Milk Frequently Does Not Meet Sodium Recommendations for the Preterm Infant.

We measured the sodium content of donor human milk (DHM) and calculated the estimated intake at a feeding volume of 160 mL/kg/day. The mean sodium content of unfortified DHM was 102.0 mg/L (4.4 mEq). Because <1% of bovine-fortified samples met the recommended sodium content, infants born preterm who are fed predominantly DHM likely require additional sodium.

Methods of mixing donor human milk during bottling results in fat differences between samples within a pool.

The influence of milk-banking processes on nutrients in donor human milk (DHM) is largely unknown. Previous studies have measured nutrients between pools of DHM, but within-pool nutrient differences (between bottles from the same pool) have yet to be elucidated. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of the effect of different mixing characteristics on the distribution of fat, protein, IgA, and lysozyme in bottled, raw DHM. Pools of DHM were created in a laboratory setting according to published human milk-banking guidelines and assigned to a mixing treatment (mixing during bottling method, pooling container material, and refrigerated hold time). Four mixing protocols using glass pooling containers and a 1-h refrigerated hold time were tested: control (no mixing during bottling); manual-A (Man-A, hand swirl after pouring 3 bottles); manual-B (Man-B, hand swirl after pouring every bottle); and mechanical-G (Mech-G, continuous stirring with a magnet). As secondary objectives, we compared the effect of a glass and a plastic pooling container with mechanical mixing (mechanical-P, Mech-P), and compared refrigerated delays of 1 and 24 h before bottling with manual mixing (manual-A24, Man-A24). To control for differences in nutrient content, comparisons between treatments were made using absolute percent difference from the treatment-specific mean; and comparisons within a treatment were made using the ratio of fat content in a bottle to fat content in the first bottle of the same pool. We did not observe differences in nutrient distribution between Man-A, Man-B, and Mech-G in pools held for 1 h, but all were significantly different from the control for fat. There were no differences between glass or plastic pooling containers when mechanical mixing was used. Holding a pool in the refrigerator for 24 h before bottling created significantly greater fat distribution than holding a pool for 1 h. Outcomes were the result of controlled experiments. In summary, manual and mechanical mixing of 1,700-mL DHM pools produces similar fat and protein distributions when DHM is pooled and bottled after a 1-h hold time. When DHM is held for 24 h before bottling, more research is needed to determine the duration of initial mixing needed to reduce fat variability between bottles.

Method for Removing Thawed Human Milk From a Plastic Storage Bag Impacts Fat Retention.

OBJECTIVES: Determine how thaw stage and bag manipulation (folding and squeezing) influence the retention of fat and number of aerobic bacteria colony-forming units when decanting human milk (HM) from plastic storage bags. METHODS: Lactating women (n = 40) in the Greensboro, North Carolina area were recruited to provide fresh HM. Samples were equally divided and frozen in storage bags for 2 months. Two thaw stages (ice/liquid) and the use of bag manipulation (yes/no) were assessed. Fat was measured using ether extraction and bacteria were measured using plate enumeration. Paired t tests were used to compare the effects of thaw stage and bag manipulation on post-thaw fat content. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the effect of bag manipulation on pre- and post-thaw bacteria. RESULTS: Fat retention was not significantly different when thawing to liquid versus ice (mean difference = 0.10 g/dL; n = 17 paired samples; P = 0.07). Decanting with bag manipulation retained more fat than decanting without manipulation, but only when HM was thawed to liquid (mean difference = 0.13 g/dL; n = 11 paired samples; P = 0.005), not when HM was thawed to ice (P = 0.47). Bag manipulation did not increase total aerobic bacteria for either thaw stage (P = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Fat retention is influenced by the method of removing previously frozen HM from plastic storage bags. Folding and squeezing the storage bag when decanting HM thawed to a liquid state increases fat recovery without increasing bacterial contamination.

Fat and Protein Variability in Donor Human Milk and Associations with Milk Banking Processes.

Background: The impact of milk banking processes on macronutrient variability in donor human milk (DHM) is largely unknown. Objective: To gain a better understanding of fat and protein composition in DHM and assess potential relationships with modifiable milk bank processes. Methods: Samples of raw, pooled DHM were collected from 20 milk banks (n = 300) along with the following processing attributes: if macronutrient analysis was used to select donors for pooling (target pooling; yes/no), number of donors per pool, pooling container material (glass/plastic/other), and method for mixing during bottling (manual/mechanical). Fat and protein were assessed. Homoscedasticity was assessed and magnitude of the spread was quantified. Results: Fat ranged from 1.9 to 6.1 g/dL (n = 298) and protein ranged from 0.7 to 1.4 g/dL (n = 300). Variability in fat was significantly lower in samples that had been target pooled (p = 0.04), contained more donors per pool (p < 0.001), and had been mixed mechanically (p < 0.001). Variability in protein was significantly lower in samples that contained more donors per pool (p = 0.001). In a stratified analysis, increasing the number of donors per pool only reduced nutrient variability in samples that were not target pooled. Conclusion: For milk banks that do not target pool, using a greater number of donors in a pool may reduce fat and protein variability.