Tolerant Epitypes of Elicited Holm Oak Somatic Embryos Could Be Revealed by Challenges in Dual Culture with Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands.

Holm oaks (Quercus ilex L.) can suffer severe infection by the oomycete Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands; the production of more tolerant plants is, therefore, required. Embryo formation is a key period in the establishment of epigenetic memory. Somatic embryos from three holm oak genotypes were elicited, either over 3 days or 60 days, with methyl-jasmonate, salicylic acid (SA), ß-aminobutyric acid (BABA), or benzothiadiazole (all at 50 µM and 100 µM), or 10% and 30% of a filtered oomycete extract (FILT10 and FILT30) to activate plant immune responses. The number of embryos produced and conversion rate under all conditions were recorded. Some elicited embryos were then exposed to P. cinnamomi in dual culture, and differential mycelial growth and the progression of necrosis were measured. The same was performed with the roots of germinated embryos. Within genotypes, significant differences were seen among the elicitation treatments in terms of both variables. Embryos and roots of 60-day BABA, SA, or FILT10 treatments inhibited mycelium growth. The 3-day BABA (either concentration) and 60-day FILT10 induced the greatest inhibition of necrosis. Mycelium and necrosis inhibition were compared with those of tolerant trees. Both inhibitions might be a defense response maintained after primed embryo germination, thus increasing the likelihood of tolerance to infection.

The evolutionary history of sea barley (Hordeum marinum) revealed by comparative physical mapping of repetitive DNA.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hordeum marinum is a species complex that includes the diploid subspecies marinum and both diploid and tetraploid forms of gussoneanum. Their relationships, the rank of the taxa and the origin of the polyploid forms remain points of debate. The present work reports a comparative karyotype analysis of six H. marinum accessions representing all taxa and cytotypes. METHODS: Karyotypes were determined by analysing the chromosomal distribution of several tandemly repeated sequences, including the Triticeae cloned probes pTa71, pTa794, pAs1 and pSc119·2 and the simple sequence repeats (SSRs) (AG)10, (AAC)5, (AAG)5, (ACT)5 and (ATC)5. KEY RESULTS: The identification of each chromosome pair in all subspecies and cytotypes is reported for the first time. Homologous relationships are also established. Wide karyotypic differences were detected within marinum accessions. Specific chromosomal markers characterized and differentiated the genomes of marinum and diploid gussoneanum. Two subgenomes were detected in the tetraploids. One of these had the same chromosome complement as diploid gussoneanum; the second subgenome, although similar to the chromosome complement of diploid H. marinum sensu lato, appeared to have no counterpart in the marinum accessions analysed here. CONCLUSIONS: The tetraploid forms of gussoneanum appear to have come about through a cross between a diploid gussoneanum progenitor and a second, related-but unidentified-diploid ancestor. The results reveal the genome structure of the different H. marinum taxa and demonstrate the allopolyploid origin of the tetraploid forms of gussoneanum.

Cytogenetic diversity of SSR motifs within and between Hordeum species carrying the H genome: H. vulgare L. and H. bulbosum L.

Non-denaturing FISH (ND-FISH) was used to compare the distribution of four simple sequence repeats (SSRs)-(AG) n , (AAG) n , (ACT) n and (ATC) n -in somatic root tip metaphase spreads of 12 barley (H. vulgare ssp. vulgare) cultivars, seven lines of their wild progenitor H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum, and four lines of their close relative H. bulbosum, to determine whether the range of molecular diversity shown by these highly polymorphic sequences is reflected at the chromosome level. In both, the cultivated and wild barleys, clusters of AG and ATC repeats were invariant. In contrast, clusters of AAG and ACT showed polymorphism. Karyotypes were prepared after the identification of their seven pairs of homologous chromosomes. Variation between these homologues was only observed in one wild accession that showed the segregation of a reciprocal translocation involving chromosomes 5H and 7H. The two subspecies of H. vulgare analysed were no different in terms of their SSRs. Only AAG repeats were found clustered strongly on the chromosomes of all lines of H. bulbosum examined. Wide variation was seen between homologous chromosomes within and across these lines. These results are the first to provide insight into the cytogenetic diversity of SSRs in barley and its closest relatives. Differences in the abundance and distribution of each SSR analysed, between H. vulgare and H. bulbosum, suggest that these species do not share the same H genome, and support the idea that these species are not very closely related. Southern blotting experiments revealed the complex organization of these SSRs, supporting the findings made with ND-FISH.