Long-term outcomes and sac volume shrinkage after endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate long-term outcomes and sac volume shrinkage after endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm repair (EVPAR). METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of all EVPAR cases between 1999 and 2012. Sac volume shrinkage, long-term patency, limb salvage, and survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The association of anatomical and clinical characteristics with patency was evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Forty-six EVPAR were carried out in 42 patients (mean age 78 years, 86% male; mean sac volume 45.5 ± 3.5 mL). In 93% of cases (n = 43) the procedure was elective, while in 7% of cases it was for rupture (n = 2) or acute thrombosis (n = 1). Of the 43 patients who underwent elective repair, 58% were asymptomatic and 42% symptomatic (14 claudication, 3 rest pain, and 1 compression symptoms). Technical success was 98%. Mean duration of follow-up was 56 ± 21 months. Primary patency at 1, 3, and 5 years was 82% (SE 2), 79% (SE 4), and 76% (SE 4), while secondary patency was 90% (SE 5), 85% (SE 4), and 82% (SE 1) respectively; at 5 years there was 98% limb salvage and an 84% survival rate. During follow-up 11 limbs had stent graft failure: six required conversion, one underwent amputation, and four continued with mild claudication. Of those with graft failure, 63% (7/11) occurred within the first year of follow-up. The mean aneurysm sac volume shrinkage between preoperative and 5-year post-procedure measurement was significant (45.5 ± 3.5 mL vs. 23.0 ± 5.0 mL; p < .001). Segment coverage >20 cm was a negative predictor for patency (HR 2.76; 95% CI 0.23; p = .032). CONCLUSIONS: EVPAR provides successful aneurysm exclusion with good long-term patency, excellent limb salvage, and survival rates. Close surveillance is nevertheless required, particularly during the first postoperative year. Patients requiring long segment coverage (>20 cm) may be at increased risk for failure.

Parallel endografts in the treatment of distal aortic and common iliac aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular treatment of distal abdominal aortic aneurysms (D-AAA) and bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms (BCIAA) may present technical challenges for standard EVAR. Parallel iliac leg endografts (ILEs) of standard aortic devices and covered stents have been successfully employed to treat patients with D-AAA and BCIAA. The perioperative and long-term results of this straightforward endovascular technique are presented. METHODS: Beginning in 2009, patients deemed unfit for open surgery underwent parallel endografts D-AAA and BCIAA exclusion. Avoiding the use of a main body, ILEs are simultaneously delivered from both femoral arteries, landing parallel into the aortic neck (parallel grafts: PG). Distal landing zones including external iliac arteries (EIAs) are reached using appropriate ILEs. A third parallel covered stent graft (Viabahn, Gore) is delivered from a left brachial approach to maintain prograde blood flow to one internal iliac artery (IIA) when needed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were successfully treated using parallel endografts, nine for BCIAA and nine for D-AAA. All D-AAA presented an irregular saccular shape, including three penetrating aortic ulcers and two pseudoaneurysms of previous aortic grafts. Prograde flow to one IIA was successfully maintained using a Viabahn graft in five patients with BCIAA. Mean aneurysm size was 50 mm in D-AAA and 43 mm in BCIAA. One patient required a perioperative ILE extension to treat a type Ib endoleak. One patient suffered a minor stroke 24 hours after the procedure. Two type II endoleaks were observed postoperatively. Five patients died of non-aneurysm related causes during follow-up. No new endoleaks, graft displacements or occlusions were observed during follow-up (median: 26 months, range 12-42 months). CONCLUSIONS: Successful exclusion of D-AAA and BCIAA was achieved in high-risk patients using parallel endografts, allowing antegrade blood flow to one IIA when needed. Commercially available endografts were used in a simple and effective approach, with excellent follow-up results.

Unusual inflow sources and device introduction sites in aortic arch debranching.

AIM: Aim of the study was to evaluate a single center experience on hybrid treatment for thoracic aortic diseases, including aortic arch and ascending aorta endografting needing a total debranching from descending thoracic aorta and an antegrade endograft deployment from left ventricle. METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2010 48 patients underwent thoracic aorta endografting, with coverage of at least one supra-aortic artery, because of atherosclerotic, dissecting and post-traumatic aneurysms or complications of previous aortic surgery. Supra-aortic trunks revascularization was obtained from ascending aorta, common carotid arteries and, in three cases, from descending thoracic aorta since the unavailability of common inflow sites. In three cases the antegrade endograft introduction through left ventricle (transapical approach, 2 cases) or ascending aorta (one case) was the only possibility for a safe deployment. RESULTS: Three groups have been identified on the basis of the proximal landing zone. Group A (27 patients): zone 2; Group B (9 patients): zone 1; Group C (12 patients): zone 0. The 30 days mortality was respectively 7.4%, 0% and 16%. Post operative paraplegia occurred in the 7.4% of group A, respiratory insufficiency and infections were the main post-operative complications with an incidence reaching 30% in each group. CONCLUSION: Hybrid procedures on aortic arch represent a possible treatment for cases unfit for open surgery despite the complication rates and mortality are not negligible. In selected cases, the endografting can be extended up to beyond the landing zone 0 where an antegrade transventricular endograft deployment and a supra-aortic perfusion from descending thoracic aorta represent a feasible option.

Open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: is it possible to predict survival?

The aim of the study was to determine variables that could be used to predict survival in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) and to assess the accuracy of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS) and the Acute Physiology Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II). From January 1998 to July 2006, 103 patients underwent operations for RAAA. For each patient, 44 variables were retrospectively recorded in a database. Data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate methods. In the univariate analysis significant predictors of death were hypotension (p=0.001), preexisting peripheral vascular disease (p<0.001), renal insufficiency (p=0.037), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p=0.028), level of HCO(3)(-) (p<0.001), intraperitoneal rupture (p=0.001), blood transfused (p<0.001), cardiac complications (p<0.001), and APACHE-II score (p=0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed statistical significance for coexisting peripheral vascular disease (p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure at admission <60 mm Hg (p=0.039), APACHE-II score >18.5 (p=0.025), HCO(3)(-) <21 mg/dL (p<0.001), and intraperitoneal rupture of the aneurysm (p=0.011) as predictors of death. Results of the study suggested that different factors can be helpful in identifying those patients whose operative risk is prohibitive. APACHE-II, contrary to GAS, is an accurate system to predict postoperative death after repair for RAAA.

Endovascular treatment of asymptomatic popliteal aneurysms: 8-year concurrent comparison with open repair.

AIM: The aim of this prospective comparative study was to compare the results of 8-years experience of endovascular treatment (ET) of popliteal aneurysms (PAs) using the Hemobahn/Viabahn endograft with those achieved with open repair (OR). Endpoints were primary and secondary patency rate. METHODS: The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial from January 1999 to December 2003 and a prospective comparative study from January 2004 to December 2006. Patients with an asymptomatic aneurismal lesion in the popliteal artery 2 cm at angio-computed tomography were included in the study. Indication for ET was PA (proximal and distal neck length >1 cm); contraindications were: 1) age <50 years; 2) poor distal run-off; 3) contraindication to antiplatelet, anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy. RESULTS: Between January 1999 and December 2006, of a total of 42 patients with 48 PA, 27 were treated with OR (group A) and 21 with ET (group B). The primary patency rate was 100% in group A and 80.9% in group B at 12 months and 71.4% and 88.1%, respectively, at 72 months; the secondary patency rate at 72 months was 88.15% and 85.9% in groups A and B, respectively. No statistical differences were observed at the log-rank test. During the entire study period, 3 (14.3%) patients in group B required conversion to open surgery because of endograft occlusion. CONCLUSION: Within the power limitations of this study, ET for asymptomatic PA in patients with suitable anatomy can be considered safe, with long-term results comparable with those of OR.

Glasgow aneurysm score predicts the outcome after emergency open repair of symptomatic, unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictor factors of in-hospital postoperative mortality in patients presenting with symptomatic but not ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients who underwent urgent open repair for symptomatic, non-ruptured AAA were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Five patients (11.9%) died during the in-hospital stay. History of coronary artery disease (p=0.014), cerebrovascular diseases (p=0.015), renal failure according to Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS) criteria (p=0.001), serum creatinine concentration (p=0.026), and the GAS (p=0.008) were predictive of postoperative death. The ROC curve analysis showed that the Glasgow Aneurysm Score had an area under the curve of 0.870 (95%C.I. 0.71-1, S.E. 0.08, p=0.008), and its best cut-off value in predicting postoperative death was 90.0 (specificity 89.2%, sensitivity 80.0%). The postoperative mortality rate of patients with a Glasgow Aneurysm Score below 90 was 2.9%, whereas it was 50% for those with a score >or=90 (p=0.003, O.R. 33.0). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the Glasgow Aneurysm Score is a good predictor of postoperative mortality and morbidity after urgent repair of symptomatic, non-ruptured AAA and can be useful in identifying those patients whose operative risk is prohibitive. Its simplicity makes it a clinically important tool, particularly, in the emergency setting. Patients having a score less than 90 can safely undergo urgent open repair. Thorough evaluation and improvement of preoperative status followed preferably by an endovascular repair is indicated for those with a score >or=90.

Synchronous carotid endarterectomy and retrograde endovascular treatment of brachiocephalic or common carotid artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and the long-term results of retrograde brachiocephalic and common carotid angioplasty and stenting (AS) performed for >70% stenosis synchronously with the carotid endarterectomy (CEA). PATIENTS: Sixteen patients operated between April 1999 and March 2002. RESULTS: 14/16 procedures were successful. There was no neurological morbidity or mortality. Per-operative angiography showed the optimal stent positioning and patency of both proximal and distal arteries in all patients. In the follow-up, all patients showed patency of the treated vessels without restenosis and the absence of any cerebrovascular symptoms. CONCLUSION: Intra-operative retrograde AS combined with CEA is an effective, safe and durable alternative to conventional surgery when a tandem significant proximal lesion is identified in a patient with an high grade carotid stenosis.

Rationale of the surgical treatment of carotid kinking.

AIM: Elongation and tortuosity of the internal carotid artery (ICAET) is a common angiographic, angioMR or Duplex scanning finding: it can be "pure" and, in a great majority of cases, it is not correlated to neurological symptoms. It can be associated with atherosclerotic bifurcation plaque, therefore in this case, indications to surgery follow that of carotid stenosis. On the other hand in some patients ICAET seems potentially correlated to hemispheric or non hemispheric symptoms: ICAET may show as kinking with a wide or narrow acute angle, single (< shaped) or double (Z shaped), or less frequently as a coiling (S,U, or C shaped). Surgical indications are controversial. In the author's opinion, surgery may represent the safest tool in the prevention of a stroke due to carotid occlusion, in selected patients. The aim of this study is to describe the author's experience in the surgical treatment of carotid kinking not associated with significant atherosclerotic lesions. METHODS: From March 1994 to March 2001, 29 patients (11 male, 18 female) with a pure ICAET underwent surgery. Patients presented hemispheric symptoms (24.13%), non hemispheric symptoms (41.3%) or both (27.5 %). Two asymptomatic patients (6.9%) underwent surgery because of contralateral carotid occlusion. RESULTS: The postoperative (within 30 days from operation) results, no mortality was observed, 1 patient presented a stroke (3.4%), and 1 patient had a TIA at awakening (negative cerebral CT scan). All patients with hemispheric symptoms (15 patients) had complete remission, whereas only 6 out of 12 patients (50%) presenting non-hemispheric symptoms had remission (1 patient underwent a controlateral ICAET correction). CONCLUSIONS: The natural history of symptomatic and asymptomatic ICAET is practically unknown, but in some cases selected indication to surgery is justified. Surgery was indicated for patients with transient ischaemic attacks ( hemispheric symptoms); in asymptomatic patients presenting a kinking with an angle inferior to 30 degrees, and a contralateral carotid artery occlusion; in patients with non hemispheric symptoms, after a screening to exclude all other possible neurological or non-neurological causes with duplex scan positive for significant increase of flow velocity in ICA and positive cerebral CT scan or MR scan for ischaemic lesions in the homolateral hemisphere, and/or a flow inversion in anterior cerebral artery or flow reduction in the middle cerebral artery, according to different head positions (rotation and flex-extension).

Prospective comparative study of two cerebral protection devices in carotid angioplasty and stenting.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare two of the available cerebral protection devices (CPD) PercuSurge, balloon type (group A) and Angioguard, filter type (group B) used in carotid stenting and angioplasty (CAS). METHODS: From September 1999 to February 2001, 26 consecutive patients undergoing CAS were alternatively assigned to group A and B. Postoperative disabling stroke and neurological mortality, nondisabling stroke, TIA and non-neurological mortality were examined. CPD features included time required, ease of handling, device rupture or malfunctioning, radiopaque markers evidence, abnormal major mobility of the opened system. RESULTS: RNCR was 0 and TIAs were not observed in either group. Four patients (3 in group A and 1 in group B) showed drowsiness in the immediate postoperative period. Perioperative carotid occlusion and surgical conversion were observed in 1 case of group A. Average time calculated from the beginning of set-up to complete removal was 46 min in group A versus 31 min in group B. Abnormal major mobility of the opened system was very often observed during endovascular maneuvers with both devices. CONCLUSIONS: CAS may protect against postoperative procedure-related neurological events. Common and specific disadvantages were observed in both systems showing they were not close enough to the ideal device.

Clamping ischemia, threshold ischemia and delayed insertion of the shunt during carotid endarterectomy with patch.

BACKGROUND: Shunt insertion during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is mandatory to avoid neurological damage due to clamping ischemia; however shunt insertion before plaque removal has many inconveniences (atheroembolism, intimal dissection, difficulty of endarterectomy). The aim of this study is to verify whether and how long shunt insertion may be safely delayed to permit plaque removal and ensure cerebral perfusion during the further time consuming manoeuvres of CEA (peeling, patch angioplasty). METHODS: From July 1990 to February 1996 383 patients underwent 411 CEAs under general anesthesia with EEG continuous monitoring and PTFE patch angioplasty. A Pruitt-Inahara shunt was routinely inserted only after atherosclerotic plaque removal. In 316 CEAs (76.9%) without EEG signs of cerebral ischemia (Group A) the mean clamping time was 10 min +/-4.8 (range 2-37 min). In 95 CEAs (23.1%) with EEG signs of cerebral ischemia (Group B) it was 7.3 min +/-3.5 (range 3-20 min). All patients had normal EEG signals after delayed shunt insertion and reperfusion (mean 21 min, range 5-45 min). RESULTS: In the short term results (within 30 days) there was a relevant neurological complication rate of 0.96% (2 major stroke and 2 lethal stroke); at awakening we observed 5 RINDs (1.21% of total) 1 in a patient of Group A (0.31%) and the other 4 in patients of Group B (4.21%). CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm the rationale of a delayed insertion of the shunt: actually the cerebral parenchyma may tolerate under general anesthesia a sufferance due to carotid clamping, EEG detectable, without neurological deficits for at least 7.3 min. This time is sufficient to perform the most difficult steps of CEA (plaque removal, distal intima checking) allowing shunt insertion in a clean operatory field, without inconveniences. Finally the shunt allows complementary time consuming steps, as patch angioplasty, with improvement of both short- and long-term results.

Surgical treatment of atherosclerotic lesions of subclavian artery: carotid-subclavian bypass versus subclavian-carotid transposition.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the short and long term results of two different surgical treatments in patients with subclavian lesions: common carotid-subclavian artery bypass (CSB) versus transposition of subclavian artery on the common carotid artery (SCT). METHODS: From 1981 until 1995, 40 non randomized patients with symptomatic subclavian steal underwent 20 CSBs and 20 SCTs. Risk factor rates were equally balanced in the two groups. Surgery was carried out routinely under general anesthesia, with electroencephalic continuous monitoring. Patency of revascularization was assessed by physical examination, brachial blood pressure determinations, ultrasound sonography and angiography whenever recurrence of symptoms developed or when the function of repair was in doubt. Patients were examined every year. In Spring 1996 (range 9-189 mos, average 7 years) a general clinical-instrumental follow-up was performed. RESULTS: In the short term (<30 days) mortality was 5%: one death (5%) for pulmonary embolism in a patient with CSB and one for myocardial infarction in a patient with SCT. The early thrombosis rate was 5% (1 CSB and 1 common carotid artery distal to a patent SCT). During follow-up 10 patients (25%) died and 6 were lost. The six-year actuarial patency rate was 100% for SCT and 66% for CSB. Moreover there were 3 thromboses of the vertebral artery homolateral to patent CSBs. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusions SCT should be considered the surgical technical choice for the treatment of proximal subclavian artery lesions.

Carotid artery endarterectomy in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: perioperative hazards and late results.

The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the perioperative hazards and late results of internal carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with and without contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion. From March 1980 to April 1990, 375 consecutive patients underwent 439 CEAs at the First Department of Vascular Surgery of Padova Medical School. Patients were divided into two groups; group 1 (61 patients) had contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion and group 2 (314 patients) did not (378 CEAs, 64 bilateral). Indications for CEA were similar in both groups. The only significant difference in patient characteristics was a higher rate of previous stroke in group 1 (11% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). General anesthesia, continuous EEG monitoring, selective intraluminal shunt, and arteriotomy closure with a polytetrafluoroethylene patch (PTFE) were used routinely in both groups. An intraluminal shunt was inserted more frequently in group 1 than in group 2 (69% vs. 17%, p < 0.001). Major perioperative stroke occurred in one patient in each group (1.7% vs. 0.31%, respectively; NS). Early fatal stroke rates were 0% and 0.95% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (NS). All patients had neurologic examinations and duplex scans every 6 months (range 6 to 118 months; mean 42 months). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were virtually identical in the two groups; the majority of deaths were caused by myocardial infarction and cancer. There were no stroke-related deaths in group 1 as compared with 8.2% in group 2 (NS). New neurologic symptoms appeared in 4.7% of patients in group 1 and 6% in group 2 (NS) whereas the late stroke rates were 0% and 3.1%, respectively (NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Indications for revascularization procedures in patients with intermittent claudication]. / Indicazioni all'intervento di rivascolarizzazione nei pazienti con claudicatio intermittens.

Patients suffering from arteriosclerotic obliterating disease of the lower limbs that present with symptoms of rest pain, ulcers or more or less severe gangrene are considered as candidates for revascularization operation. Apart from the possible non relevance of individual symptoms, in some instances the revascularization operation is indicated solely on the basis of the angiographic evidence. Ascending thrombosis of the abdominal aorta, double or triple blocks, stenosis of the collateral circulation and, broadly speaking, any other situation that suggests a possible superimposition of an episode of acute ischaemia due to thrombosis in a condition of chronic obliterating arteriopathy are considered as absolute indication for revascularization operation. Patients whose conditions are not listed above are considered as stage II and indication for operation in this case is not absolute but relative or "luxury" since its purpose is only to improve the quality of life. The importance of the symptoms must be considered along with other factors, including the personal, social, working, sporting and psychological needs of the specific individual apart from the absence of general risks related to the patient's condition. The vascular surgeon's expertise is obviously fundamental in exactly evaluating the arteriography and in understanding the precise anatomic picture that varies in every single case: in fact, since the operation is optional and not a necessity, correction of the arterial lesions in only advisable when it is possible to carry out and operation that is broadly risk free and with good short and long term results, with reference to the patient's life expectancy.