Changes in Coagulation Testing During a National Shortage of Blue-Top Tubes.

OBJECTIVES: Manufacturer recalls and altered supply chains during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a nationwide shortage of blue-top tubes (BTTs). Most non-point-of-care coagulation tests use these tubes, leaving laboratories and health care facilities in short supply. The Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center implemented interventions to conserve supply without sacrificing patient safety. METHODS: In a retrospective quality improvement analysis, we examined coagulation testing and BTT utilization over the 3-month interval during which our interventions were applied. Our study assessed the interventions' effectiveness by evaluating changes in BTT utilization, coagulation testing volume, and patient impact. RESULTS: Average daily use (ADU) of BTT before and after the intervention were 476 and 403, respectively-a 15.2% reduction. Notably, the Emergency Department had a reduction in ADU of 43.3%. Average daily volumes of coagulation assays performed decreased from 949 to 783-a 17.5% reduction. No adverse events from the Pharmacy Department were identified during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions resulting in significant reductions were in divisions with effective management and supervision. Success in navigating the BTT shortage stemmed from timely announcements, action, and effective communication. Our recommendations established more effective coagulation assay utilization, decreased overall BTT use, and prevented patients with coagulopathic disorders from experiencing adverse consequences.

Does Immunohistochemistry Add to Morphology in Differentiating Trichoepithelioma, Desmoplastic Trichoepithelioma, Morpheaform Basal Cell Carcinoma, and Microcystic Adnexal Carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: The distinction among cutaneous basaloid neoplasms such as trichoepithelioma (TE), desmoplastic trichoepithelioma (DTE), morpheaform basal cell carcinoma (MBCC), and microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC) can be difficult, especially in superficial biopsies. As the treatment plan of each entity is different, accurate characterization is important for appropriate management. While TE and DTE are benign neoplasms with indolent behavior, MBCC and MAC are typically locally aggressive. The expression of several recently described immunohistochemical (IHC) markers, including p40, IMP3, and ProEx C, has not been adequately established in cutaneous neoplasms. We explored the potential utility of a broad IHC panel, including previously reported and novel markers to differentiate TE, DTE, MBCC, and MAC. DESIGN: A total of 35 archival cases [TE (n=14), DTE (n=9), MBCC (n=6), and MAC (n=6)] were stained with 9 IHC markers: p40, IMP3, ProEx C, p16, CK20, Ki-67, androgen receptor, D2-40, and beta-catenin. Tumors with >5% immunoreactivity were scored as positive. The intensity was scored on a scale from 1+ to 3+. The pattern of positivity- nuclear, cytoplasmic, membranous, or in combination; peripheral or central distribution with lesion was also recorded. RESULTS: CK20 (in contrast to prior studies) and IMP3 were negative in all cases. Likewise, with the exception of one case of TE, androgen receptor showed no immunoreactivity in all categories. No significant difference was observed in the expression of beta-catenin, p16, ProEx C, and p40 among the four groups of cutaneous neoplasms. The mean Ki-67 labeling index for MBCC (8%) was slightly higher than DTE (3%). Interestingly, the proliferation index for TE (15%) was significantly higher than that of MBCC. All six cases of MAC and 36% of TEs expressed D2-40; neither the MBCC nor DE cases showed D2-40immunoreactivity. Also, we confirmed the previously published observation of scattered CK20 positive Merkel cells in the epidermis of all cases of DTE; whereas, no Merkel cells were identified in MBCC and MAC cases. CONCLUSIONS: Except Ki-67, our IHC panel showed no significant added diagnostic utility of IHC in discriminating among TE, DTE, MBCC, and MAC. Among the four cutaneous neoplasms, DTE and MBCC show a small but discernible difference in Ki-67.

Immunohistochemistry for Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma in the Differential Diagnosis of Melanocytic Lesions of the Nail Apparatus.

ABSTRACT: Nail unit melanocytic lesions present a unique set of diagnostic challenges because of the unfamiliarity with clinical assessment and the lack of experience with histologic examination. Because the first surgical specimen received in the pathology laboratory is typically small, sometimes suboptimal biopsy, the distinction between melanoma and its histologic mimics can be difficult. For this reason, there has been a continued interest in the development of ancillary markers that may assist in the differential diagnosis of nail unit melanocytic lesions. Upregulation of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) has been reported to be a common event in melanomas, and PRAME immunohistochemistry has been shown to be helpful in evaluating various melanocytic neoplasms. In this study, we evaluated PRAME protein expression in a series of nail unit melanocytic lesions. Twenty-five nail unit melanomas (including small biopsy and amputation specimens) and 32 control benign melanocytic lesions were retrospectively retrieved. Nuclear PRAME staining was scored as percentage and intensity labeling. All melanoma cases showed the nuclear expression of PRAME, which was usually diffuse and strong. In specimens where the neoplastic cells are limited in number, the staining was restricted to the tumor cells, corresponding to the initial H&E impression. All control cases were negative for PRAME expression. PRAME expression is helpful in distinguishing between melanomas and other nail unit melanocytic lesions. This antibody also proved to be diagnostically valuable in detecting melanoma cells in small specimens with minimal disease.

Impact of the Paris system for reporting urine cytopathology on predictive values of the equivocal diagnostic categories and interobserver agreement.

BACKGROUND: The Paris System (TPS) acknowledges the need for more standardized terminology for reporting urine cytopathology results and minimizing the use of equivocal terms. We apply TPS diagnostic terminologies to assess interobserver agreement, compare TPS with the traditional method (TM) of reporting urine cytopathology, and evaluate the rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of each TPS diagnostic category. A survey is conducted at the end of the study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred urine samples were reviewed independently by six cytopathologists. The diagnosis was rendered according to TPS categories: negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), atypical urothelial cells (AUC), low-grade urothelial neoplasm (LGUN), suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (SHGUC), and high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). The agreement was assessed using kappa. Disagreements were classified as high and low impacts. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Perfect consensus agreement was 31%, with an overall kappa of 0.362. Kappa by diagnostic category was 0.483, 0.178, 0.258, and 0.520 for NHGUC, AUC, SHGUC, and HGUC, respectively. Both TM and TPS showed 100% specificity and PPV. TPS showed 43% sensitivity (38% by TM) and 70% accuracy (66% by TM). Disagreements with high clinical impact were 27%. Of the 100 cases, 52 were concurrent biopsy-proven HGUC. The detection rate of biopsy-proven HGUC was 43% by TPS (57% by TM). The rate of NHGUC was 54% by TPS versus 26% by TM. AUC rate was 23% by TPS (44% by TM). The PPV of the AUC category by TPS was 61% versus 43% by TM. The survey showed 33% overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: TPS shows adequate precision for NHGUC and HGUC, with low interobserver agreement for other categories. TPS significantly increased the clinical significance of AUC category. Refinement and widespread application of TPS diagnostic criteria may further improve interobserver agreement and the detection rate of HGUC.

Diagnostic utility of dual 5-hydroxymethylcytosine/Melan-A immunohistochemistry in differentiating nodal nevus from metastatic melanoma: An effective first-line test for the workup of sentinel lymph node specimen.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing benign nodal nevus from metastatic melanoma can be diagnostically challenging, with important clinical consequences. Recently, the loss of epigenetic marker, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) expression by immunohistochemistry has been found in melanomas and atypical melanocytic neoplasms. METHODS: About 41 metastatic melanomas and 20 nodal nevi were retrieved. Nuclear 5-hmC (brown) and cytoplasmic Melan-A Red (red) double immunohistochemical staining was performed. RESULTS: Total or partial loss of nuclear expression of 5-hmC was noted in 40/41 metastatic melanomas; these tumor cells were strongly positive for Melan-A Red, except in one case of desmoplastic melanoma. All cases of nodal nevus showed uniformly retained nuclear expression of 5-hmC accompanied by strong Melan-A Red cytoplasmic staining. In two cases containing both nodal nevus and metastatic melanoma, all tumor cells were positive for Melan-A Red, but a nuclear expression of 5-hmC was selectively absent only in the melanoma tumor cells. CONCLUSION: Dual 5-hmC/Melan-A Red immunohistochemistry is highly specific in distinguishing nodal nevus from metastatic melanoma. Our protocol for brown and red chromogens used in this study provides excellent color contrast and is easy to interpret. Furthermore, this dual staining method allows the preservation of limited tumor tissue, which could be used for potential molecular studies.

GATA3 Expression in Normal Skin and in Benign and Malignant Epidermal and Cutaneous Adnexal Neoplasms.

Initial investigations reported GATA3 to be a sensitive and relatively specific marker for mammary and urothelial carcinomas. Recently, GATA3 expression has been described in several other epithelial tumors. However, there has been only limited investigation of GATA3 expression in cutaneous epithelial tumors. The objective of this study was to examine the immunohistochemical expression of GATA3 in a wide variety of cutaneous epithelial neoplasms. GATA3 expression was evaluated in 99 benign and 63 malignant cutaneous epithelial tumors. GATA3 was consistently and usually strongly expressed in clear cell acanthoma, trichofolliculoma, trichoepithelioma, trichilemmoma, sebaceous adenoma, sebaceoma, apocrine hidrocystoma, apocrine tubular papillary adenoma, hidradenoma papilliferum, and syringocystadenoma papilliferum. Hidradenomas exhibited variable positive staining. Most poromas, syringomas, chondroid syringomas, cylindromas, and spiradenomas were negative or only focally and weakly positive. Focal staining was present in all pilomatrixomas. Thirteen of 14 basal cell carcinomas, 21 of 24 squamous carcinomas, and all 6 sebaceous carcinomas exhibited positive staining. The 1 apocrine carcinoma, both mucinous carcinomas, and 2 of 3 microcystic adnexal carcinomas also exhibited positive staining, whereas the 1 eccrine porocarcinoma and the 1 adenoid cystic carcinoma were negative. One of 11 Merkel cell carcinomas exhibited focal weak staining. Our findings demonstrate that GATA3 is expressed in a wide variety of benign and malignant cutaneous epithelial neoplasms. In addition to carcinomas of breast and urothelial origin and other more recently described GATA3-positive tumors, the differential diagnosis of a metastatic tumor of unknown primary origin that expresses GATA3 should also include a carcinoma of cutaneous epithelial origin.

Uniform Labeling of Blocks and Slides in Surgical Pathology: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center and the National Society for Histotechnology.

CONTEXT: The labeling of paraffin blocks and microscopic glass slides in the practice of surgical pathology varies from institution to institution and introduces potential risk of preanalytic error. Currently there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding the uniform labeling of these materials. OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations that will address the need for adequate patient identification and provide a consistent method of identifying slides originating from a particular block. DESIGN: - The College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center and the National Society for Histotechnology convened a panel of pathologists and histotechnologists with expertise in histology laboratory quality practices to develop labeling recommendations. A systematic evidence review was conducted to address 6 main key questions. Recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. RESULTS: Twelve guideline statements were established to assist pathology laboratories in developing standardized block and slide labeling practices. These guidelines call for the use of 2 patient identifiers, 1 of which includes the accession number and case type, on all paraffin blocks and slides. Recommendations were also developed to address the order and format in which identifying elements should appear. CONCLUSIONS: Uniform labeling of paraffin blocks and slides derived from patient specimens will provide an important enhancement to patient safety by assuring that all preparations derived from a patient's tissue can be uniquely and unambiguously linked to that patient. Adoption of standardized practices additionally will improve patient care by facilitating interpretation of histologic sections when they are referred in consultation to a second institution.

Data set for pathology reporting of cutaneous invasive melanoma: recommendations from the international collaboration on cancer reporting (ICCR).

An accurate and complete pathology report is critical for the optimal management of cutaneous melanoma patients. Protocols for the pathologic reporting of melanoma have been independently developed by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA), Royal College of Pathologists (United Kingdom) (RCPath), and College of American Pathologists (CAP). In this study, data sets, checklists, and structured reporting protocols for pathologic examination and reporting of cutaneous melanoma were analyzed by an international panel of melanoma pathologists and clinicians with the aim of developing a common, internationally agreed upon, evidence-based data set. The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting cutaneous melanoma expert review panel analyzed the existing RCPA, RCPath, and CAP data sets to develop a protocol containing "required" (mandatory/core) and "recommended" (nonmandatory/noncore) elements. Required elements were defined as those that had agreed evidentiary support at National Health and Medical Research Council level III-2 level of evidence or above and that were unanimously agreed upon by the review panel to be essential for the clinical management, staging, or assessment of the prognosis of melanoma or fundamental for pathologic diagnosis. Recommended elements were those considered to be clinically important and recommended for good practice but with lesser degrees of supportive evidence. Sixteen core/required data elements for cutaneous melanoma pathology reports were defined (with an additional 4 core/required elements for specimens received with lymph nodes). Eighteen additional data elements with a lesser level of evidentiary support were included in the recommended data set. Consensus response values (permitted responses) were formulated for each data item. Development and agreement of this evidence-based protocol at an international level was accomplished in a timely and efficient manner, and the processes described herein may facilitate the development of protocols for other tumor types. Widespread utilization of an internationally agreed upon, structured pathology data set for melanoma will lead not only to improved patient management but is a prerequisite for research and for international benchmarking in health care.

Reticulin and NM23 staining in the interpretation of lymph nodal nevus rests.

Melanocytic nevus rests in lymph nodes are a known diagnostic challenge, especially in patients with a history of melanoma. Reticulin and NM23 have been studied in this context. The pattern of reticulin staining in melanomas surrounds groups/nests of melanocytes but individual cells in benign nevi. NM23, a metastasis-suppressor gene, has an association with metastatic potential in melanomas and some carcinomas. Twenty-eight cases (14 cases of metastatic melanoma to lymph nodes and 14 cases of lymph node nevus rests, all confirmed with Melan-A staining) were stained with reticulin and NM23. The pattern of reticulin staining was reported as surrounding groups if staining was noted in approximately 5-10 melanocytes in greater than 50% of the lesion but was otherwise reported as surrounding individual melanocytes. Cytoplasmic staining was considered to represent reactivity for NM23. Reticulin staining around groups of melanocytes was identified in all 14 cases of metastatic melanoma. Regarding nodal nevus rest cases, 12 of 14 cases (86%) demonstrated staining around individual melanocytes, whereas in 2 cases, reticulin surrounded melanocytic groups. NM23 staining was equivocal in all cases. Reticulin staining reliably invests groups of melanocytes in cases of metastatic melanoma, whereas in nodal nevus rests, it predominantly surrounds individual melanocytes. NM23 demonstrated no discriminatory value in this analysis. In cases in which a collection of melanocytes is present within a lymph node, reticulin deposition around individual melanocytes supports a diagnosis of lymph nodal nevus rest.

Nevic mitoses: a review of 1041 cases.

The presence of dermal mitotic figures is helpful in identifying malignant melanocytic lesions but occasionally occur in benign nevi. We aim to determine a "benchmark" mitotic frequency for a wide variety of nevi. We prospectively collected 1041 cases of benign melanocytic nevi and reviewed them for the presence of mitotic figures. Specimens were collected from female (62%) and male (38%) participants, ages ranged from 1 to 90 years. Nevus types included compound melanocytic nevi (CMN), intradermal melanocytic nevi, junctional melanocytic nevi, lentiginous CMN (LCMN), lentiginous junctional melanocytic nevi, blue nevi, deep penetrating nevi, and pigmented spindle cell nevi. Nevi with congenital, mildly dysplastic, and Spitzoid features were included. A total of 82 of 1041 (7.9%) nevi contained one or more mitotic figures. Most (76.1%) mitoses were found in the papillary dermis. Single mitotic figures were more common (80.4%) than 2 (15.9%) or 3 (3.7%) within a single specimen. Of all cases containing mitotic figures, the most common nevus type was CMN. The nevus type most frequently demonstrating mitotic figures was CMN. The most common body site among cases with mitotic figures was trunk (53.7%), whereas the body site with the largest proportion of nevi demonstrating mitotic figures was special site (10.9%). The percentage of nevi containing mitotic figures was nearly the same among female (7.9%) and male (7.8%) participants. Results of this large review confirm that mitotic figures, even multiple ones, do not preclude benignity in a variety of melanocytic nevi.

Interobserver and intraobserver variability in evaluating vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unique in that the presence of vascular invasion significantly changes tumor stage. Even though searching for vascular invasion is a common practice in surgical pathology, there appears to be a great variation among pathologists in its recognition. This study was designed to assess whether HCC could be accurately staged using vascular invasion as a staging parameter. METHODS: The interobserver and intraobserver agreement for vascular invasion was analyzed in 126 liver resections for HCC. Selected slides were circulated twice among six pathologists for independent review using their own criteria. One to three representative images from 26 equivocal cases selected by one of the authors were re-evaluated by the pathologists. The presence or absence of vascular invasion on each slide or image was recorded as yes or no. The results were analyzed using unweighted kappa statistic analysis for multiple raters. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement was moderate on two slide circulations with kappa values of 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.55) and 0.43 (0.38-0.47), respectively. The kappa value dropped significantly to 0.19 (0.09-0.29) on selected images photographed from controversial cases. The intraobserver agreement was moderate, with kappa values ranging from 0.23 to 0.56 (mean = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Pathologists can reproducibly recognize vascular invasion in many HCC cases but may have difficulty in equivocal cases, which may lead to either understaging or overstaging of the tumors. This may have a significant impact on prognostic assessment and therapeutic decision making. Our observations indicate the need for improved definition for vascular invasion in HCC.