Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 47(5): 301-308, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35193970

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. METHODS: Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. RESULTS: Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. CONCLUSION: By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Documentação , Humanos
2.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 32(2): 136-45, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17350525

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is little knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of local anesthetics and adjunctive analgesics after paravertebral blockade. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of low-dose levobupivacaine, fentanyl, and clonidine after paravertebral analgesia for breast surgery. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients receiving paravertebral analgesia for breast surgery received a 19-mL paravertebral bolus of levobupivacaine 0.25% combined with a 1-mL volume of saline (group L, 13 patients), fentanyl 50 microg (group LF, 13 patients), or clonidine 150 microg (group LC, 12 patients) followed 1 hour later by infusion of levobupivacaine 0.1% (L), levobupivacaine 0.05% with fentany l 4 microg/mL (LF), or levobupivacaine 0.05% with clonidine 3 microg/mL (LC), respectively. Plasma concentrations of study drugs were determined at intervals up to 24 hours after bolus injection. RESULTS: There was rapid absorption of levobupivacaine after bolus with mean (standard deviation) maximum plasma concentration (Cpmax) of 0.51(0.24) microg/mL in a median time to maximum concentration tCpmax of 15 minutes. Mean Cpmax fentanyl and clonidine after bolus were 0.62 (0.37) and 0.79 (0.23) ng/mL, in a median tCpmax of 15 and 22.5 minutes, respectively. Mean Cpmax levobupivacaine after infusion was 0.47 (0.41) microg/mL in a median tCpmax of 24 hours. There was progressive accumulation of fentanyl and clonidine at 24 hours with a mean Cpmax of 0.72 (0.33) and 1.74 (0.70) ng/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After paravertebral bolus and infusion administration, Cpmax levobupivacaine was within the safe range. Cpmax fentanyl and clonidine were less than the effective levels after IV administration, suggesting that their analgesic effect may be partly attributed to a peripheral mechanism of action.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Anestésicos Locais/farmacocinética , Clonidina/farmacocinética , Fentanila/farmacocinética , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais/sangue , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Bupivacaína/análogos & derivados , Bupivacaína/sangue , Bupivacaína/farmacocinética , Clonidina/sangue , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Feminino , Fentanila/sangue , Humanos , Levobupivacaína , Espectrometria de Massas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Vértebras Torácicas/inervação
3.
J Clin Anesth ; 19(1): 67-74, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17321932

RESUMO

Regional anesthesia has many advantages, which include low cost, ease of administration, and avoidance of risks associated with general anesthesia. Injection of local anesthetic via a needle as part of a regional anesthetic technique can be a stressful experience. The goal is to produce a relaxed patient who is comfortable and cooperative throughout the duration of surgery. The topics of regional anesthetic techniques, drug combinations, and adjunct measures such as sedation have been described extensively in the literature. The issue of patient comfort has not been reviewed in its entirety. This review seeks to collate known information in a systematic format and provide a framework for patient comfort during regional anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Anestesia por Condução/métodos , Anestesia por Condução/psicologia , Temperatura Corporal , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacocinética , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/psicologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...