The Effects of Global Budgeting on Emergency Department Admission Rates in Maryland.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In 2014, Maryland launched a population-based payment model that replaced fee-for-service payments with global budgets for all hospital-based services. This global budget revenue program gives hospitals strong incentives to tightly control patient volume and meet budget targets. We examine the effects of the global budget revenue model on rates of admission to the hospital from emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We used medical record and billing data to examine adult ED encounters from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015, in 25 hospital-based EDs, including 10 Maryland global budget revenue hospitals, 10 matched non-Maryland hospitals (primary control), and 5 Maryland Total Patient Revenue hospitals (secondary control). Total Patient Revenue hospitals adopted global budgeting in 2010 under a pilot Maryland program targeting rural hospitals. We conducted difference-in-differences analyses for overall ED admission rates, ED admission rates for ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions and non-ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions, and for clinical conditions that commonly lead to admission. RESULTS: In 3,175,210 ED encounters, the ED admission rate for Maryland global budget revenue hospitals decreased by 0.6% (95% confidence interval -0.8% to -0.4%) compared with that for non-Maryland controls after global budget revenue implementation, a 3.0% relative decline, and decreased by 1.9% (95% confidence interval -2.2% to -1.7%) compared with that for Total Patient Revenue hospitals, a 9.5% relative decline. Relative declines in ED admission rates were similar for ambulatory-care-sensitive-condition and non-ambulatory-care-sensitive-condition encounters. Admission rate declines varied across clinical conditions. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the global budget revenue model led to statistically significant although modest declines in ED admission rates within its first 2 years, with declines in ED admissions most pronounced among certain clinical conditions.

The Impact of Maryland's Global Budget Payment Reform on Emergency Department Admission Rates in a Single Health System.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the state of Maryland (MD) moved away from fee-for-service payments and into a global budget revenue (GBR) structure where hospitals have a fixed revenue target, independent of patient volume or services provided. We assess the effects of GBR adoption on emergency department (ED) admission decisions among adult encounters. METHODS: We used hospital medical record and billing data from adult ED encounters from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015, with four MD hospitals and two District of Columbia (DC) hospitals within the same health system. We performed difference-in-differences analysis and calculated the effects of the GBR model on ED admission rates (inpatient and observation) using hospital fixed-effect regression adjusted for patient, hospital, and community factors. We also examined changes in the distribution of acuity among ED admissions with GBR adoption. RESULTS: The study sample included 1,492,953 ED encounters with a mean ED admission rate of 20.5%. The ED admission rate difference pre- and post-GBR was -1.14% (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.89 to -1.40) for MD hospitals and -0.04% (95% CI = -0.24 to 0.32) for DC hospitals with a difference-in-differences result of -1.10% (95% CI = -1.34 to -0.86). This change was attributable to a -3.3% (95% CI = -3.54 to -3.08) decline in inpatient admissions and 2.7% (95% CI = 2.53 to 2.79) increase in observation admissions. Declines in admissions were observed primarily among mild-to-moderate severity of illness encounters with a low risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Within the same health system, implementation of global budgeting in MD hospitals was associated with a decline in ED admissions-particularly lower-acuity admissions-compared to DC hospitals that remained under fee-for-service payments.

The 2013 Dip: Factors Influencing Falling Emergency Department Visits and Inpatient Admissions in District of Columbia and Maryland.

BACKGROUND: Earlier reports have documented growth of United States emergency department (ED) visits since the early 1990s. OBJECTIVE: In this report, we describe recent trends in ED utilization and inpatient admissions in Maryland and District of Columbia hospitals from 2011 to 2013. METHODS: We analyzed monthly ED visit and inpatient admission volumes from 53 acute care hospitals in Maryland and the District of Columbia from 2011 to 2013. Fixed-effect regression was used to assess the relationship between community-level demographics, hospital insurance mix, urgent care/retail clinic density, and hospitals participating in Maryland's Total Patient Revenue (TPR) pilot-a global payment program-and changes in ED visit and hospital admission volume from 2012 to 2013. RESULTS: Across 53 Maryland and District of Columbia hospitals, ED visits grew 2.8% between 2011 and 2012. From 2012 to 2013, ED visits declined by 3.5%. Admissions declined by 3.3% from 2011 to 2012, then declined again 3.6% from 2012 to 2013. Community demographic or hospital insurance-mix variable and density of urgent care centers were not associated with lower ED visits. Inpatient admissions fell significantly more in hospitals participating in Maryland's TPR global payment pilot program. CONCLUSIONS: In 2013, ED visits in fell in Maryland and District of Columbia hospitals, and inpatient admission volumes fell from 2011 to 2013. This is a reversal of decades-long trends in higher health care utilization. These trends were not explained by demographics, insurance, or ED alternatives, however, falling admission rates were more pronounced in Maryland hospitals participating in global payment programs.

Use of emergency medical services expedites in-hospital care processes in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

To determine whether door-to-balloon (DTB) times of patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were reduced in patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) compared to those who were self-transported. DTB time is an important measure of hospital care processes in STEMI. Use of EMS may expedite in-hospital processing and reduce DTB times. A total of 309 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention in our institution were analyzed. Excluded were patients who received fibrinolytics, presented in cardiac arrest, were intubated, or were transferred from another hospital. EMS-transported patients (n=83) were compared to self-transported patients (n=226). The primary outcome measure was DTB time and its component time intervals. Secondary end points included symptom-to-door and symptom-to-balloon times, and correlates for DTB >90 minutes. A higher percentage of EMS-transported patients reached the time goal of DTB <90 minutes compared to self-transported patients (83.1 versus 54.3%; p<0.001). EMS-transported patients had shorter DTB times [median (IQR) minutes, 65 (50-86) versus 85 (61-126); p<0.001] due to a reduction of emergency department processing (door-to-call) time, whereas catheterization laboratory processing (call-to-balloon) times were similar in both groups. EMS-transported patients had shorter symptom-to-door [median (IQR) hours, 1.2 (0.8-3.5) versus 2.3 (1.2-7.5); p<0.001] and symptom-to-balloon [median (IQR) hours, 2.5 (1.9-4.7) versus 4.3 (2.6-9.1); p<0.001]. Independent correlates of DTB times >90 minutes were self-transport (odds ratio 5.32, 95% CI 2.65-10.70; p<0.001) and off-hours presentation (odds ratio 2.89, 95% CI 1.60-5.22; p<0.001). Use of EMS transport in STEMI patients significantly shortens time to reperfusion, primarily by expediting emergency department processes. Community education efforts should focus not only on the importance of recognizing symptoms of myocardial infarction, but also taking early action by calling the EMS.

Emergency department variation in utilization and diagnostic yield of advanced radiography in diagnosis of pulmonary embolus.

BACKGROUND: There is growing pressure to measure and reduce unnecessary imaging in the emergency department. OBJECTIVE: We study provider and hospital variation in utilization and diagnostic yield for advanced radiography in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) and to assess patient- and provider-level factors associated with diagnostic yield. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all adult patients presenting to four hospitals from January 2006 through December 2009 who had a computed tomography or ventilation/perfusion scan to evaluate for PE. Demographic data on the providers ordering the scans were collected. Diagnostic yield (positive scans/total scans ordered) was calculated at the hospital and provider level. The study was not designed to assess appropriateness of imaging. RESULTS: There was significant variation in utilization and diagnostic yield at the hospital level (chi-squared, p < 0.05). Diagnostic yield ranged from 4.2% to 8.2%; after adjusting for patient- and provider-level factors; the two hospitals with an emergency medicine residency training program had higher diagnostic yields (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.5 and OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.4). There was no significant variation in diagnostic yield among the 90 providers after adjusting for patient, hospital, and provider characteristics. Providers with < 10 years of experience had lower odds of diagnosing a PE than more experienced graduates (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found significant variation in utilization of advanced radiography for PE and diagnostic yield at the hospital level, there was no significant variation at the provider level after adjusting for patient-, hospital-, and provider-level factors.

Emergency department physician-level and hospital-level variation in admission rates.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We explore the variation in physician- and hospital-level admission rates in a group of emergency physicians in a single health system. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that used retrospective data during various periods (2005 to 2010) to determine the variation in admission rates among emergency physicians from 3 emergency departments (EDs) within the same health system. Patients who left without being seen or left against medical advice, patients treated in fast-track departments, patients with primary psychiatric complaints, and those younger than 18 years were excluded, as were physicians with fewer than 500 ED encounters during the study period. Emergency physician-level and hospital-level admission rates were estimated with hierarchic logistic regression, which adjusted for patient age, sex, race, chief complaint, arrival mode, and arrival day and time. RESULTS: A total of 389,120 ED visits were included in the analysis, and patients were treated by 89 attending emergency physicians. After adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics, the hospital-level admission rate varied from 27% to 41%. At the physician level, admission rates varied from 21% to 49%. CONCLUSION: There was 2.3-fold variation in emergency physician adjusted admission rates and 1.7-fold variation at the hospital level. In the new era of cost containment, wide variation in this common, costly decision requires further exploration.

The prevalence of quality issues and adverse outcomes among 72-hour return admissions in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Records of patients discharged from the Emergency Department (ED) who return within 72 h and are admitted are often reviewed for potential quality issues. OBJECTIVES: We explored 72-h return admissions and determined the prevalence and predictors for substandard management on the initial visit or any adverse outcome. METHODS: Retrospective review of quality assurance data from 72-h return admissions in three hospitals from 2006-2010 was performed. Any substandard quality on the first visit or change in outcome on the return admission was considered "low quality." Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between cases judged as low quality vs. not low quality. RESULTS: Of 741,132 ED visits across 5 years, 3682 (0.5%) were 72-h return admissions. Of those, 192 (5%) were low quality. In 158 (4%) and 8 (0.2%) there were moderate and severe deviations from care standards, respectively. Similarly, in 53 (1%) and 14 (0.4%) there were moderate and severe changes in outcome. In adjusted analysis, there were higher rates of low-quality 72-h return admissions in ambulance arrivals (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.1); and lower rates in Medicaid patients (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.7). There were higher rates in low-quality 72-h return admissions in hospital 1 (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.2-6.1) and hospital 3 (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.0-4.7) compared to hospital 2. CONCLUSIONS: Poor care on the initial visit or any poor outcome upon returning in 72-h return admissions is relatively rare in the ED. Reporting 72-h return admissions without chart review may not be a good way to measure clinical quality.

Emergency department focused bedside echocardiography in massive pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common consideration in unstable patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain, dyspnea, or cardiac arrest. It is a potentially lethal condition necessitating prompt recognition and aggressive management. Conventional diagnostic modalities in the ED, including chest computed tomography angiography and ventilation-perfusion scanning, require the unstable patient to leave the department, and raise concerns over renal injury. Several case reports document findings of massive PE on echocardiography performed in the ED; however, none was performed, interpreted, and acted upon in the form of thrombolytic therapy by an emergency physician without the additional benefit of a cardiologist's interpretation or a confirmatory imaging study. OBJECTIVE: We present a case that illustrates the utility of ED focused bedside echocardiography in suspected massive PE and briefly review direct and indirect ultrasound findings of acute PE. CASE REPORT: A case of massive PE in a 61-year-old woman is reported. In this patient with marked dyspnea, progressive hemodynamic instability, and contraindications to definitive imaging, ED focused bedside echocardiography provided valuable information that strongly suggested the diagnosis and led to alteplase administration. To our knowledge, this case represents the first report of thrombolytic therapy administration for acute massive PE based solely on clinical presentation and an emergency physician-performed bedside echocardiogram. CONCLUSION: In the hands of an experienced emergency physician ultrasonographer, ED focused bedside echocardiography provides a safe, rapid, and non-invasive diagnostic adjunct for evaluation of the patient suspected of having massive PE.