The Cancer Care Index: A Novel Metric to Assess Overall Performance of a Pediatric Oncology Program.

OBJECTIVE: Childhood cancer metrics are currently primarily focused on survival rates and late effects of therapy. Our objectives were to design and test a metric that reflected overall quality and safety performance, across all cancer types, of an oncology-bone marrow transplant service line and to use the metric to drive improvement. METHOD: The Cancer Care Index (CCI) aggregates adverse safety events and missed opportunities for best practices into a composite score that reflects overall program performance without regard to cancer type or patient outcome. Fifteen domains were selected in 3 areas as follows: (1) treatment-related quality and safety, (2) provision of a harm-free environment, and (3) psychosocial support. The CCI is the aggregate number of adverse events or missed opportunities to provide quality care in a given time frame. A lower CCI reflects better care and improved overall system performance. Multidisciplinary microsystem-based teams addressed specific aims for each domain. The CCI was widely followed by all team members, particularly frontline providers. RESULTS: The CCI was easy to calculate and deploy and well accepted by the staff. The annual CCI progressively decreased from 278 in 2012 to 160 in 2014, a 42% reduction. Improvements in care were realized across most index domains. Multiple new initiatives were successfully implemented. CONCLUSIONS: The CCI is a useful metric to document performance improvement across a broad range of domains, regardless of cancer type. By the use of quality improvement science, progressive reduction in CCI has occurred over a 3-year period.

A Quality Improvement Approach to Increase Exercise Assessment in Survivors of Childhood Leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Survivors of childhood cancer are at increased risk of treatment-related cardiovascular disease, the severity of which is impacted by the level of regular exercise. Exercise assessments (EAs) are not a routine component of follow-up care. METHODS: We incorporated a quantitative EA tool into the clinic triage during follow-up visits for survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The nursing staff was surveyed on the use of the EA tool to gauge understanding and level of comfort with addressing patient questions. RESULTS: Over 27 months, the percentage of off-therapy acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with documented EA increased from 0% to 80%. We noted degradation in EA completions in the last 6 months of the project, which we attributed to project nursing staff transition and failure to maintain education. Interventions that improved the percentage of completed EA included the incorporation the assessment tool into the electronic medical record and weekly reminders of scheduled eligible patients. A nurse incentive plan did not impact project success. Survey results revealed that the nursing staff were comfortable with the EA and did not view the new process as hurting patient flow. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an EA tool into routine clinic follow-up was successful. We met the project goal of assessing greater than 50% of the follow-up patients. This work will serve as the foundation for the next phase of the project, which will be to provide education on the importance of exercise and earlier intervention when a sedentary lifestyle is identified.

A multiyear quality improvement project to increase influenza vaccination in a pediatric oncology population undergoing active therapy.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to reduce morbidity and mortality from vaccine preventable influenza infection, national consensus guidelines recommend vaccination of patients who are immunocompromised as a result of receiving cancer therapy. Quality improvement (QI) processes are a proven method used to improve vaccination rates. PROCEDURE: We conducted a QI initiative aimed at increasing influenza vaccination in oncology patients undergoing active treatment. Primary drivers for the project focused on patient education, staff and provider education, and communication regarding vaccine-eligible patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of influenza infection among the vaccine-eligible population. This approach has validity at our institution because of the consistent follow-up and hospital admission pattern of cancer patients on active therapy such that nearly all follow-up care is delivered at our institution. RESULTS: We successfully achieved greater than 87% vaccination of eligible patients each vaccine season (September to March). During the recommended timeframe for delivering influenza vaccine between September and December of each vaccine season, we offered the vaccine to 100% of patients on active therapy and vaccinated >90%. Barriers to success, including vaccine refusals, increased late in the vaccine season. Influenza infection was documented in 0.5-7.3% of the vaccine-eligible group. CONCLUSION: A robust influenza vaccination program implemented using a standardized QI approach can sustain a high vaccination rate in a pediatric oncology population receiving active treatment. The influenza infection rate was under 10% in the vaccinated group.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Standardize Use of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in the PICU.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is a potent pulmonary vasodilator used off-label to treat refractory hypoxemia in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). However, clinical practice varies widely, and there is limited evidence to support this expensive therapy. Our objective was to test whether implementation of a clinical guideline for iNO therapy would decrease practice variability, reduce ineffective iNO utilization, and control iNO-related costs. METHODS: We used quality improvement (QI) methodology to standardize the use of iNO in a single quaternary care PICU (noncardiac). All PICU patients receiving iNO therapy between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2013, were included. The QI intervention was the development and implementation of a clinical guideline for iNO initiation, continuation, and weaning. iNO use was monitored using statistical process control charts. RESULTS: We derived baseline data from 30 preguideline patients (35 separate iNO courses) compared with 33 postguideline patients (36 separate iNO courses). Despite similar baseline characteristics, disease severity, and degree of hypoxemia, postguideline patients had a shorter median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of iNO therapy than preguideline patients [76 (48-124) hours versus 162 (87-290) hours; P < 0.0001]. We have sustained the reduced iNO usage throughout the postguideline period. Postguideline patients also had improved provider documentation and a median iNO cost savings of $4,600. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of iNO usage guidelines was associated with decreased iNO usage and cost of iNO therapy in the PICU.

Multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to reduce ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis in the PICU.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that successful implementation of a care bundle designed to prevent nosocomial airway infection will be associated with decreased incidence of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. DESIGN: Prospective pre- and post interventional. SETTING: PICU at an academic medical center PATIENTS: : All patients admitted to the PICU who received invasive mechanical ventilation for greater than or equal to 48 hours between March 1, 2009, and December 31, 2011. INTERVENTION: Multidisciplinary, unit wide implementation of an evidence-based care bundle to prevent ventilator-associated airway infection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 725 patients included in the analysis (338 patients preintervention and 387 patients postintervention). Baseline ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis rate in the preintervention period was 3.9 cases per 1,000 ventilator days compared with 1.8 cases per 1,000 ventilator days postintervention (p = 0.04, Fisher exact test). Compared with patients without ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis or ventilator-associated pneumonia, patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis had fewer ventilator-free days in 28 days (4.9 vs 22; p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test) and fewer ICU-free days in 28 days (0.5 vs 19; p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U test). These relationships remained significant after adjusting for covariates by multivariable linear regression. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of a care bundle to prevent ventilator-associated infection was associated with decreased incidence of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. Development of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis was independently associated with adverse outcomes in our cohort of pediatric ICU patients.

A drug fatality involving Kratom.

A 17-year-old white man who showed no obvious signs of trauma was found unresponsive in bed and was pronounced dead at the scene. The decedent had a documented history of heroin abuse and chronic back pain and reportedly self-medicated with Kratom (mitragynine). The autopsy was remarkable only for pulmonary congestion and edema and a distended bladder, both of which are consistent with, though not diagnostic of, opiate use. A laboratory work-up revealed therapeutic levels of over-the-counter cold medications and benzodiazepines. However, of interest was a level of mitragynine at 0.60 mg/L. Given the facts of the case, the Medical Examiner certified the cause of death as "possible Kratom toxicity" and the manner of death was classified as "accident."

Is routine histopathologic examination beneficial in all medicolegal autopsies?

Postmortem examinations are performed for a number of reasons. Medical autopsies are performed at the request of and with the consent of the next of kin of a decedent and are often requested to determine the extent of a disease process or to evaluate therapy. In contrast, medicolegal autopsies are performed by a forensic pathologist primarily to determine cause and manner of death but also to document trauma, diagnose potentially infectious diseases and report them to the appropriate agencies, provide information to families about potentially inheritable diseases, provide information to family members and investigative agencies, and testify in court. As medicolegal and hospital autopsies differ in their purpose, so do they differ in procedure. Medicolegal autopsies often include histologic analysis, but not always, as with medical autopsies. We designed a prospective study to address the question of whether or not routine histologic examination is useful in medicolegal cases, defining a routine case as one where histology would not normally be performed and where the cause and manner of death were readily apparent during the gross autopsy. We reviewed brain, heart, liver, kidney, and lung sections on 189 routine forensic cases and compared the results to the gross anatomic findings. Of the 189 cases, in only 1 case did microscopic examination affect the cause of death and in no case did microscopic examination affect the manner of death. Thus, we feel that routine microscopic examination (performing histologic examination in all cases regardless of cause and manner of death) in forensic autopsy is unnecessary. Microscopic examination should be used, as needed, in certain circumstances but is not necessary as a matter of routine.