On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass: independent risk factors and off-pump graft patency.

OBJECTIVE: Current knowledge on off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) generally stems from single surgeons' experience or from series where OPCABs constituted a minor fraction of coronary operations. The present center decided to venture as far into OPCAB as possible during 1999. The present series thus represents the average surgeon's experience. METHODS: During 1999, 533 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in 368 and OPCAB in 165 including the circumflex artery (CX) area in 91. Coronary arteriography was performed before discharge in the first 103 OPCAB patients. RESULTS: The CPB and OPCAB groups differed as regards left ventricular ejection fraction (53+/-13 versus 57+/-11, P < 0.0001) and frequency of triple-vessel or left main stem disease (84 versus 32%, P < 0.0001) but were comparable as regards diabetes (12%), prior myocardial infarct (57%), unstable angina (21%), and previous heart surgery (3%). Using multivariate analyses, 30-day mortality (1.3%), P-creatine kinase myocardial band (CKMB) > 80 microg/l (11.1%), re-sternotomy for bleeding (4.5%) or dehiscense (1.7%), transitory cerebral ischemia and stroke (1.7%), supraventricular tachycardia (27.4%), and hospital stay (mean 8 days) were unrelated to off- versus on-pump surgery as well as to OPCAB in triple-vessel disease. CX branches < or = 1mm, > or = 5 distal anastomoses, prior heart surgery, right coronary artery (RCA) branches < or = 1.5mm, 8-21 days old myocardial infarct, female gender, and preoperative acute arrhythmia (among others) were identified as independent risk factors for mortality or increased CKMB in all 533 patients. The latter five risk factors were reproduced in the OPCAB group isolated. The patency in the 103 OPCABs was 95.3, 91.8, and 85.3% in the left anterior descending artery (LAD), CX, and RCA, respectively. Patency was inversely related to diameter of the grafted vessel in the LAD and CX areas, unlike the RCA area. CONCLUSIONS: The results after beating heart surgery were good also in patients with triple-vessel disease, but specific gains relative to on-pump surgery could not be shown. The independent risk factors in the OPCAB group may indicate relative contraindications for OPCAB grafting.

Pollution with nitrous oxide using laryngeal mask or face mask.

BACKGROUND: As environmental pollution by nitrous oxide may influence the health of the personnel working in operating theatres, the incidence and magnitude of nitrous oxide (N2O) leakage, when using a face mask or a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for controlled ventilation, were studied in 34 patients scheduled for elective cystoscopy. METHODS: A semi-closed gas delivery ventilation system with active scavenging was used. The N2O concentrations were measured every 8 s at a position 30 cm above the patient's mouth with a N2O gas monitor (GD 200, Simrad Optronics). RESULTS: When using a face mask, the leakage of N2O resulted in a N2O concentration of 157 (85-332) p.p.m. (parts per million) (median concentration and 25% and 75% percentiles). With the LMA, a lower median concentration of N2O of 60 (28-126) p.p.m. was found (P=0.04). With the face mask, a concentration above 100 p.p.m. was found during 51% of the exposure time compared to 24% of the time in the LMA group. CONCLUSION: Environmental pollution was less with the LMA than the face mask, but under the conditions of the study both modes of airway management were associated with levels of N2O peak concentrations in the breathing zone of anaesthetists that are deemed to be excessively high by the Danish National Institute for Occupational Safety.

Tactile evaluation of the response to double burst stimulation decreases, but does not eliminate, the problem of postoperative residual paralysis.

BACKGROUND: Routine perioperative monitoring with accelero-myography might prevent residual block, whereas routine tactile evaluation of the response to train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation does not. The purpose of this prospective, randomised and blinded study was to evaluate the effect of manual evaluation of the response to double burst stimulation (DBS3.3) upon the incidence of residual block. METHODS: Sixty adult patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were included in the study. Pancuronium 0.08 to 0.1 mg kg-1 was given for relaxation and tracheal intubation. For maintenance of neuromuscular block, pancuronium 1-2 mg was administered. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In group DBS (double burst stimulation) the degree of block during anaesthesia was assessed by manual evaluation of the response to TOF nerve stimulation. During reversal, when no fade was detectable in the TOF response, the stimulation pattern was changed to DBS3.3. The trachea was extubated when the anaesthetist judged the neuromuscular function to have recovered adequately and no fade in the DBS3.3 response could be felt. In group CC (clinical criteria) patients were managed without the use of a nerve stimulator, and the level of neuromuscular block and reversal were evaluated solely on the basis of clinical criteria. In both groups, the TOF ratio was measured by mechanomyography immediately after tracheal extubation. Also, the ability to sustain head lift for 5 s, to protrude the tongue, to open the eyes, and to lift one arm to the opposite shoulder were tested. RESULTS: The TOF ratio, as measured immediately after tracheal extubation, was significantly lower in group CC than in group DBS (means: 0.68 and 0.78, respectively), and the incidence of residual neuromuscular block defined as a TOF ratio < 0.7 was significantly higher in group CC than in group DBS (57 and 24%, respectively). The time from the first TOF measurement until the TOF ratio reached 0.8 was significantly longer in group CC than in group DBs (means: 11.5 and 6.2 min, respectively). No significant differences between the two groups of patients were found in duration of anaesthesia, in times from end of surgery to injection of neostigmine, tracheal extubation or TOF ratio 0.8, in dose of pancuronium, or in any other postoperative variable. CONCLUSION: Routine perioperative manual evaluation of the responses to TOF and DBS3.3 decreased the incidence and the degree of residual block following the use of pancuronium. It did not, however, exclude clinically significant residual paralysis, nor did it influence the amount of pancuronium used during the operation, the duration of anaesthesia or the time from end of surgery to tracheal extubation or to sufficient recovery of neuromuscular function (TOF = 0.8).

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol or etomidate.

In combination with fentanyl, propofol was compared with etomidate for total intravenous anaesthesia in 21 women (ASA Grades I-II) admitted for elective hysterectomy. They received either propofol (bolus 1.5 mg kg-1, infusion 9 mg kg-1 h-1 for 10 min thereafter 6 mg kg-1 h-1) or etomidate (bolus 0.10 mg kg-1, infusion 3 mg kg-1 h-1 reduced to 0.6 mg kg-1 h-1). Fentanyl 10 micrograms kg-1 was given for induction followed by an infusion of 30 micrograms kg-1 h-1 for 10 min reduced to 6 micrograms kg-1 h-1 for the first hour and successively reduced over time. Induction was smooth and maintenance easy to manage in both groups. There was no difference in time from end of infusion until extubation, but the time until the patients could report their date of birth was significantly shorter in the propofol group. Nausea and vomiting were more pronounced in the etomidate group, and mental side-effects were only seen after etomidate. After 3 months, more patients in the etomidate group complained of reduced power of concentration. We conclude that total intravenous anaesthesia with either propofol or etomidate is equally easy to manage, but in the recovery situation propofol was advantageous in time and quality.

Awakening and recovery of simple cognitive and psychomotor functions 2 h after anaesthesia for day-case surgery--total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol-alfentanil versus thiopentone-alfentanil.

Fifty-seven patients undergoing minor out-patient gynaecological procedures were allocated to one of two total intravenous anaesthesia regimes: propofol and alfentanil or thiopentone and alfentanil. Diazepam was given orally as premedication. To assess objectively the quality of recovery, the patients underwent a number of tests pre-operatively and two hours post-operatively. The time to opening of eyes and orientation was equal in both groups, as was the recovery of the tested cognitive and psychomotor functions after 2 h, when the score in both groups had returned to baseline. We conclude that the use of propofol instead of thiopentone for shorter surgical procedures gives no advantage as regards length of stay in hospital.