The public's perspective on the amount of time surgeons spend operating.

BACKGROUND: As waiting lists for elective surgery grow, there seems to be a disconnect between the public's expectations on the amount of time surgeons spend operating compared with reality. On average, a surgeon in the NHS spends one day a week performing elective surgery. We aimed to investigate the public's perception on the amount of time surgeons spend performing elective surgery and what they would desire. METHODS: Members of the public in the UK were approached randomly either on-line or in-person to complete an anonymised 6-question survey. The questionnaire included demographic details, surgical history, occupational experience in the healthcare sector, the number of days a week they believe and wish for surgeons to be performing elective surgery. RESULTS: 252 members of the public responded to the survey (150 females, 102 males). 38.5% have experience working in the healthcare sector and 58.5% have had surgery in the past. 83.7% believe surgeons spend at least 3 days a week performing elective surgery [3-4 days (43.2%), 5-7 days (40.5%)]. 45.7% of respondents want their surgeon to operate between 5 and 7 days per week. CONCLUSION: The public appears to overestimate the amount of time that surgeons spend performing elective surgery and have unrealistic expectations of how much they want their surgeons to operate.

How much time do surgeons spend operating?

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, there is significant variation in the amount of time surgeons spend performing elective surgery. The degree of variation is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the variation in amount of time that surgeons spend operating worldwide. METHODS: An anonymised electronic survey was sent via email to members of The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons (TUGS) and shared via social media. The questionnaire consisted of demographic details (age, gender, country of practice), scope of practice (full time/less than full time; private/public sector), experience and average number of days the surgeon spends performing elective surgery. RESULTS: A total of 225 predominantly general/upper GI surgeons from 47 countries responded. Worldwide, the median number of days that surgeons spend performing elective surgery is 2 days a week. There was significant variation across countries/continents: UK 1 day; North America 2.5 days; Europe 3 days; Asia 2 days; Africa 2 days; South America 1 day; Oceania 1 day (p < 0.0001). All surgeons worldwide preferred to spend 3 days a week performing elective surgery except UK surgeons who desired 2 days a week. CONCLUSION: There is significant variation in the amount of time that surgeons spend performing elective surgery worldwide. Results of this study could inform public expectations and trainee surgeons on ideal opportunities for training. Reasons for the wide variation could be explored.

The Savage Organizational Scoring System for the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test: Norms and New Data From Veterans in a Traumatic Brain Injury Clinic.

The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT) permits quantifying diverse cognitive abilities, including executive function (EF). We evaluated the psychometric properties of a scoring procedure for the RCFT, the Savage Organizational Scoring System (SOSS), that awards points for drawing the largest structural elements of the figures as continuous wholes. This was a two-phase study: first, we conducted a systematic literature search for studies using the SOSS, and aggregated previously published data for healthy controls to create a normative database; second, we observed performances from veterans evaluated for traumatic brain injury (TBI), examining the reliability of their SOSS scores, the SOSS correlations with two EF measures and the participants' self-reported cognitive functioning, and then compared their mean scores to normative expectations. Across our literature-derived normative database, the aggregated mean SOSS score was 4.12 (SD = 1.72), which was marginally higher than that of our veteran participants evaluated for TBI, 3.72 (SD = 1.79). The SOSS had modest internal consistency (α = .59). Unlike the criterion EF measures, the SOSS was not significantly related to self-reported cognitive functioning. The SOSS shared a small, significant correlation with Trails B and Shipley Abstraction; but RCFT Copy scores were more strongly related to these tests, and the SOSS added no significant incremental predictive value beyond the RCFT Copy score. However, SOSS scores did predict RCFT Recall beyond RCFT Copy scores. We conclude that the SOSS has modest reliability and is predictive of RCFT Recall scores, but it is not strongly correlated with other EF measures, and it is only minimally affected by mild TBI.