Double-lung versus heart-lung transplantation for end-stage cardiopulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We compared posttransplant outcomes following double-lung transplantation (DLTx) and heart-lung transplantation (HLTx), based on a search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, from inception to March 8, 2022, for studies that report outcomes of these procedures. We then performed a meta-analysis of baseline characteristics and posttransplant outcomes. Subgroup analyses were implemented according to indication, publication year, and center. This study was registered on PROSPERO (number CRD42020223493). Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis, involving 1230 DLTx patients and 1022 HLTx patients. The DLTx group was characterized by older donors (P = 0.04) and a longer allograft ischemia time (P < 0.001) than the HLTx group. The two groups had comparable 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year survival rates (all P > 0.05), with similar results identified in subgroup analyses. We found no significant differences in 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival, length of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay, length of postoperative ventilation, in-hospital mortality, or surgical complications between the groups (all P > 0.05). Thus, DLTx provides similar posttransplant survival to HLTx for end-stage cardiopulmonary disease. These two procedures have a comparable risk of CLAD and other posttransplant outcomes.

A novel web-based dynamic nomogram for recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: Patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are liable to develop recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node metastasis (LNM). We aimed to assess the predictive value of the long diameter (LD) and short diameter (SD) of RLN lymph node (LN) and construct a web-based dynamic nomogram for RLN LNM prediction. Methods: We reviewed 186 ESCC patients who underwent RLN LN dissection from January 2016 to December 2018 in the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College. Risk factors for left and right RLN LNM were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. A web-based dynamic nomogram was constructed by using logistic regression. The performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score. Models were internally validated by performing five-fold cross-validation. Results: Patients who underwent left and right RLN LN dissection were categorized as left cohort (n = 132) and right cohort (n = 159), with RLN LNM rates of 15.9% (21/132) and 21.4% (34/159), respectively. The AUCs of the LD (SD) of RLN LN were 0.663 (0.688) in the left cohort and 0.696 (0.705) in the right cohort. The multivariate analysis showed that age, the SD of RLN LN, and clinical T stage were significant risk factors for left RLN LNM (all P < 0.05), while tumor location, the SD of RLN LN, and clinical T stage were significant risk factors for right RLN LNM (all P < 0.05). The dynamic nomograms showed reliable performance after five-fold cross-validation [(left (right), mean AUC: 0.814, range: 0.614-0.891 (0.775, range: 0.084-0.126); mean Brier score: 0.103, range: 0.084-0.126 (0.145, range: 0.105-0.206)], available at https://mpthtw.shinyapps.io/leftnomo/ and https://mpthtw.shinyapps.io/rightnomo/. Conclusion: The LD and SD of RLN LN are inadequate to predict RLN LNM accurately, but online dynamic nomograms by combined risk factors show better prediction performance and convenient clinical application.