Integration of a handheld based anaesthesia rounding system into an anaesthesia information management system.

BACKGROUND: At the University Hospital Giessen, an anesthesia information management system (AIMS) is used for online record keeping of perioperative patient care, but preoperative anaesthesia assessments were still being recorded on paper and subsequently entered into the AIMS. Personal digital assistants (PDAs) seem to be useful instruments to establish a seamless digital anesthesiological documentation. OBJECTIVES: We decided to implement a solution for direct integration of data gathered during the preoperative assessment into the existing data management infrastructure. Parallel to the development of the system, we surveyed the future users to match their wishes and needs as far as possible. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: A C program embedding the preoperative AIMS' data fields was developed. Data alignment with the Hospital information system (HIS) is controlled by a Java desktop software. The anaesthesiologist completes the available fields at the patient's bedside following the same algorithm and integrity check as the PC version. STATUS REPORT: Overall, 68% of the surveyed physicians supported the implementation of the system. The PDA solution has been available since May 2002. Data replication into the handheld and integration of mobile collected data into the AIMS generally work without problems. The HIS interconnection software converts the PDA file into the AIMS format for further processing. DISCUSSION: The preoperative anaesthetic assessment is a standardised task well suitable for conversion to an electronic data storage medium. Changing from redundant data entry in the OR to direct electronic recording at the patient's bedside seems simply logical. Handheld computers are inexpensive, flexible gadgets to realize this.

Intra-operative tachycardia and peri-operative outcome.

BACKGROUND: Intra-operative tachycardia is a common adverse event, often recorded as an indicator for process quality in quality assurance projects in anaesthesia. METHODS: This retrospective study is based on data sets of 28,065 patients recorded with a computerised anaesthesia record-keeping system from 23 February 1999 to 31 December 2000 at a tertiary care university hospital. Cases were defined as patients with intra-operative tachycardia; references were automatically selected according to matching variables (high-risk surgery, severe congestive heart failure, severe coronary artery disease, significant carotid artery stenosis and/or history of stroke, renal failure, diabetes mellitus and urgency of surgery) in a stepwise fashion. Main outcome measures were hospital mortality, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and prolonged hospital stay. Differences in outcome measures between the matched pairs were assessed by univariate analysis. Stepwise regression models were developed to predict the impact of intra-operative tachycardia on the different outcome measures. RESULTS: In our study 474 patients (1.7%) were found to have had intra-operative tachycardia. Matching was successful for 99.4% of the cases, leading to 471 cases and references. The crude mortality rates for the cases and matched references were 5.5% and 2.5%, respectively (P=0.020). Of all case patients, 22.3% were treated in an ICU, compared to 11.0% of the matched references (P=0.001). Hospital stay was prolonged in 25.1% of the patients with tachycardia compared to 15.1% of the matched references (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with intra-operative tachycardia who were undergoing non-cardiac surgery had a greater peri-operative risk, leading to increased mortality, greater frequency of admission to an ICU and prolonged hospital stay.