Effects of tamsulosin on bladder blood flow and bladder function in rats with bladder outlet obstruction.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the mechanism underlying the ameliorating effect of tamsulosin, an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist, on storage symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia, the effects of tamsulosin on bladder blood flow (BBF) and bladder function was evaluated in rats with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). METHODS: BOO was produced by partial ligature of the proximal urethra, which was maintained for 2 weeks. Tamsulosin was subcutaneously administered via an osmotic pump for 2 weeks immediately after the BOO surgery. The BBF in the sham-operated rats, the control BOO rats, and the tamsulosin-treated BOO rats was measured using the fluoromicrosphere method. Each rat was kept in a metabolic cage for observation of micturition behavior. Expression of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtype mRNA in the vesical artery was measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: BBF was significantly reduced in BOO rats compared with sham-operated rats, and tamsulosin significantly increased the BBF in BOO rats. Tamsulosin ameliorated the decrease in mean voided volume in BOO rats with bladder masses < 500 mg. Expression of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtype in the vesical artery was alpha(1a)- > alpha(1d)-adrenoceptors; almost no expression was observed of alpha(1b)-adrenoceptors in either sham-operated or BOO rats. CONCLUSIONS: Tamsulosin increased BBF in BOO rats via an antagonistic effect, presumably on the alpha(1A)- and/or alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor in the vesical artery mainly, and improved the decrease in mean voided volume. Therefore, the results of this study suggest that tamsulosin improves bladder overactivity via improvement of BBF.

Superiority of YM598 over atrasentan as a selective endothelin ETA receptor antagonist.

The binding affinities of (E)-N-[6-methoxy-5-(2-methoxyphenoxy)[2,2'-bipyrimidin]-4-yl]-2-phenylethenesulfonamide monopotassium salt (YM598) for native human endothelin ETA and ETB receptors expressed in human coronary artery smooth muscle cells (CASMC) and a human melanoma cell line, SK-Mel-28, respectively, were examined, and the results compared with those for the endothelin receptor antagonists atrasentan and bosentan. The in vivo endothelin ETA receptor inhibitory activities of YM598 and atrasentan were also compared through the suppression of the big endothelin-1-induced pressor response in pithed rats. Ki values of YM598, atrasentan, and bosentan for native human endothelin ETA receptors were 0.772, 0.0551, and 4.75 nM, while those for native human endothelin ETB receptors were 143, 4.80, and 40.9 nM, respectively. The calculated selectivity ratios of YM598, atrasentan, and bosentan for endothelin ETA versus ETB receptors were 185, 87 and 8.6, respectively. In pithed rats, YM598 and atrasentan inhibited the big endothelin-1 (1 nmol/kg)-induced pressor response in a dose-dependent manner on both intravenous and oral administration. The inhibitory effect of YM598 was less potent than that of atrasentan when these agents were intravenously administered, but closely similar on oral administration. These results suggest that YM598 has high selectivity for native human ETA against ETB receptors, and that YM598 is superior to atrasentan as an ETA receptor antagonist with regard to pharmacological bioavailability in rats.

Effects of selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists on endothelin-1-induced potentiation of cancer pain.

In some diseases in which endothelin-1 production increases, e.g. prostate cancer, endothelin-1 is considered to be involved in the generation of pain. In the present study, we investigated the effects of a selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, (E)-N-[6-methoxy-5-(2-methoxyphenoxy)[2,2'-bipyrimidin]-4-yl]-2-phenylethenesulfonamide monopotassium salt (YM598), on the nociception potentiated by endothelin-1 in a cancer inoculation-induced pain model in mice, induced by inoculation of the androgen-independent human prostate cancer cell line PPC-1 into the hind paws of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. No pain responses were observed in the sham-operated mice, whereas monophasic pain responses were observed in the PPC-1-inoculated mice. Endothelin-1 (1 to 10 pmol/paw) but not sarafotoxin S6c potentiated the pain response in prostate cancer-inoculated mice. Both YM598 and atrasentan (0.3 to 3 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited the endothelin-1 (10 pmol/paw)-induced potentiation of nociception in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that selective endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists might relieve pain in patients with various diseases in which endothelin-1 production is increased, e.g. prostate cancer.

Inhibitory effects of a selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist YM598 on endothelin-1-induced potentiation of nociception in formalin-induced and prostate cancer-induced pain models in mice.

In some diseases in which endothelin-1 (ET-1) production increases (e.g. prostate cancer), ET-1 is considered to be involved in the generation of pain. In the present study, we investigated the effects of a selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist, YM598, on the nociception potentiated by ET-1 in formalin-induced and cancer inoculation-induced pain models in mice. The formalin-induced pain model was prepared by intraplantar injection of 0.7% formalin into the hind paws of ICR mice, and the cancer pain model was prepared by inoculation of the human prostate cancer cell line PPC-1 into the hind paws of severe combined immunodeficiency mice. Formalin caused a biphasic pain response and paw edema in the mouse hind paw. ET-1 (10 pmol/paw) potentiated these responses, and single oral administration of YM598 (0.3-3 mg/kg) significantly inhibited this ET-1-induced potentiation of nociception and paw edema. ET-1 (10 pmol/paw) also potentiated the pain response in prostate cancer-inoculated mice. Both YM598 and atrasentan (0.3-3 mg/kg) significantly inhibited the ET-1-induced potentiation of nociception. These results suggest that selective endothelin-A receptor antagonists relieve pain in patients with various diseases in which ET-1 production increases (e.g. prostate cancer).