Does re-ossification after palliative radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases help maintain vertebral body height?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: After palliative radiotherapy of spinal bone metastases, re-ossification is sometimes observed in bone with osteolytic changes. However, it remains unknown whether the re-ossification that is observed after radiotherapy is associated with preservation of vertebral body height. PURPOSE: To investigate whether re-ossification observed after palliative radiotherapy can contribute to the preservation of vertebral body height. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study. PATIENTS SAMPLE: We investigated 111 vertebral bodies in 54 patients that underwent palliative radiotherapy at a single center for painful osteolytic/mixed metastatic spinal tumors in solid tumors between 2016 and 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures were the presence of re-ossification and vertebral body height reduction on the CT image. METHODS: Re-ossification was evaluated according to the MD Anderson response classification criteria, and sagittal CT images were used to evaluate vertebral body height. A vertebral body ID was assigned to the irradiated vertebral body, and continuous CT images obtained for each vertebral body ID were evaluated. The median number of evaluation periods for each vertebral body was 4, and the total number of periods was 463. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate factors related to the occurrence of vertebral body height reduction before the subsequent CT. As a subanalysis, factors related to re-ossification were investigated. RESULTS: The following primary cancer types were observed: lung cancer, 41 vertebral bodies; breast cancer, 19; renal cell cancer, 15; other, 36. A total of 62.2% showed re-ossification. The median time to confirmation of re-ossification by CT was 2 months. Factors significantly associated with vertebral body height reduction were presence of vertebral body height reduction before radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-63, p=.01) and no re-ossification (OR 137, 95% CI 22-3469, p<.01). Factors associated with re-ossification were the type of cancer and total radiation dose. Those with lung cancer and those with a total radiation dose of 20 Gy or less were more prone to re-ossification. CONCLUSIONS: Re-ossification was observed in 62.2% of vertebral bodies after palliative radiotherapy for painful osteolytic/mixed metastatic spinal tumors. The re-ossification group demonstrated significantly less vertebral body height reduction when compared with the non-re-ossification group. The presence of re-ossification may potentially serve an important role in maintaining vertebral body height.

A case of mediastinal mesenchymal tumor with pericytic neoplasm feature that responded to radiation therapy.

Here, we report a case of mediastinal mesenchymal tumor with a pericytic neoplasm feature that responded to radiation therapy. A 43-year-old man visited our hospital with a complaint of esophageal obstruction and chest pain. Chest computed tomography revealed a middle mediastinal tumor and a mesenchymal tumor was diagnosed with a pericytic neoplasm feature by video-assisted thoracoscopic biopsy. The definitive treatment for soft tissue tumor is surgical resection; however, the mediastinal tumor was unresectable because of esophageal and tracheal invasion. Radiation therapy was administered and there was a partial tumor response and 2 years disease-free status. With a review of the literature, we discuss the clinical and pathological characteristics of this rare tumor and its treatment.

Impact of upgraded radiotherapy system on outcomes in postoperative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Background: This study was performed to evaluate the impact of upgrade of radiotherapy system, including launch of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), on the therapeutic outcomes. Materials and methods: Patients with head and neck (H&N) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who underwent postoperative radiotherapy at our hospital between June 2009 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. In July 2014, we converted the radiotherapy technique for these patients from a 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to IMRT, along with the adoption of a meticulous planning policy and a few advanced procedures, including online imaging guidance. Results: A total of 136 patients (57 treated with the previous system and 79 treated with the upgraded system) were reviewed. There were significantly more patients with extracapsular extension in the upgraded-system group than the previous-system group (p = 0.0021). There were significantly fewer patients with ≥ Grade 2 acute and late adverse events in the upgraded-system group than the previous-system group. The differences in progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DFFS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), and overall survival (OS) between the two groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.8962, 0.9926, 0.6244, and 0.4827, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that the upgrade had neither positive nor negative impact on survival outcomes. Extracapsular extension was independently associated with decreased LRPFS and OS (p = 0.0499 and 0.0392, respectively). Conclusions: The IMRT-centered upgrade was beneficial for the postoperative patients with H&N SCC, because survival outcomes were sustained with less toxicities.

Impact of low-dose tadalafil on adverse events after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A bi-center randomized open-label trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil in attenuating adverse events after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: This was a randomized open-label trial, conducted at two institutions. Prostate cancer patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy were randomly assigned to receive tadalafil (study group) or tamsulosin (control group). The primary endpoint was International Prostate Symptom Score for subjective evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms. Uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine volume, and Sexual Health Inventory for Men score were the secondary endpoints. Each clinical variable was evaluated during a follow-up period of 1 year after low-dose-rate brachytherapy. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in this study, with a final total of 96 patients analyzed. The mean total International Prostate Symptom Score changes at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after low-dose-rate brachytherapy were +7.4, +7.1, +4.7, +1.5, and +0.8, respectively, in the tamsulosin group, and +8.5, +9.2, +6.4, +4.1, and +1.6, respectively, in the tadalafil group. There were no statistically significant differences in International Prostate Symptom Score with the exception of the score at 9-month follow-up. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the uroflowmetry or postvoid residual urine volume findings. The Sexual Health Inventory for Men score in the tadalafil group was significantly higher than that in the tamsulosin group at 6, 9, and 12 months after low-dose-rate brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil could be an effective option for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms after low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Ten-Year Experience of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy at a Single Institution: Impact of Technological Development on the Outcome of Patients With Early Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Advanced radiotherapeutic techniques and apparatus have been developed and widely applied in stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, but their clinical benefits have not necessarily been confirmed. This study was performed to review our 10-year experience with therapy for the disease and to evaluate whether the advanced radiotherapeutic system implemented in our hospital 5 years after we began the therapy improved the clinical outcomes of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent the therapy at our hospital between April 2008 and March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into 2 groups treated with the conventional system or the advanced system, and the characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. The same analyses were also performed in propensity-matched patients from the 2 groups. RESULTS: Among the 73 patients eligible for this study, 42 were treated with the conventional system and 31 with the advanced system. All were treated as planned, and severe adverse events were rare. The local progression-free survival rate in the advanced system group was significantly higher than in the conventional system group (P = 0.025). In the propensity-matched patients, both the local progression-free survival rate and the overall survival rate were significantly higher compared in the advanced system group than the conventional system group (P = 0.089 and 0.080, respectively). CONCLUSION: The advanced system improved the outcomes of patients with the disease, suggesting that technological development has had a strong impact on clinical outcomes.

Outcomes of uterine cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastases after radiotherapy without boost irradiation of metastases.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of uterine cervical cancer patients with pelvic lymph node (PLN) metastases after radiotherapy without boost irradiation of the metastases and to clarify the necessity of the boost irradiation of metastatic lesions. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with uterine cervical cancer metastasizing only to the PLN were treated with definitive radiotherapy without boost irradiation of the metastases between 2008 and 2012 at our institution and were selected for this study. The pattern of progression, overall survival, and progression-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the PLN metastases were controlled by radiotherapy. Twenty-two of 32 patients (69%) experienced progression. Distant metastases as initial progression were observed in 21 of these 22 patients (95%). Only two patients experienced failures in pre-treatment metastatic PLN as initial progression, along with other failures. Severe late lower gastrointestinal toxicities were not observed in any patients. Two-year cumulative overall survival and progression-free survival were 74% and 31%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Boost irradiation of PLN metastases is not necessarily indispensable. Further studies to examine the necessity of boost irradiation of PLN metastases in radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer patients with metastases are required.

Palliative radiotherapy for Japanese patients with malignant melanoma: a single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the significance of palliative radiotherapy for Japanese patients with malignant melanoma based on the experience of our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with malignant melanoma who underwent palliative radiotherapy at our facility were included in the investigation. Median radiation dose was 30 Gy (4-30). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 4.2 months (range 2.7-40.5 months). Twenty-two patient (75.9%) died during the follow-up. The response rate of overall symptoms to radiotherapy was 63.0%. The rate of completely resolved hemorrhage was relatively high (81.8%). The median time of freedom from progression in completely resolved symptoms was 3.1 months (range 0.2-27.8 months). Radiation dose <30 Gy and poor performance status tended to be associated with poor symptomatic relief in treatment site (p = .080 and p = .068, respectively). There were very few severe toxic events. CONCLUSION: Two thirds of symptoms were safely alleviated by palliative radiotherapy for Japanese patients with malignant melanoma. The therapeutic effect was retained for a substantial duration. Further domestic studies are warranted.

Validity of reduced radiation dose for localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma showing a good response to chemotherapy.

To evaluate the validity of a decrease in the radiation dose for patients who were good responders to chemotherapy for localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 91 patients with localized DLBCL who underwent radiotherapy after multi-agent chemotherapy from 1988-2008 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria were as follows: central nervous system or nasal cavity primary site, or Stage II with bulky tumor (≥10 cm). Of these patients, 62 were identified as good responders to chemotherapy. They were divided into two groups receiving either a higher or a lower radiation dose (32-50.4 Gy or 15-30.6 Gy, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the lower and higher dose groups in progression-free survival, locoregional progression-free survival or overall survival. Adaptation of decreased radiation dose may be valid for localized DLBCL patients who show a good response to chemotherapy.