Cross-modal functional connectivity supports speech understanding in cochlear implant users.

Sensory deprivation can lead to cross-modal cortical changes, whereby sensory brain regions deprived of input may be recruited to perform atypical function. Enhanced cross-modal responses to visual stimuli observed in auditory cortex of postlingually deaf cochlear implant (CI) users are hypothesized to reflect increased activation of cortical language regions, but it is unclear if this cross-modal activity is "adaptive" or "mal-adaptive" for speech understanding. To determine if increased activation of language regions is correlated with better speech understanding in CI users, we assessed task-related activation and functional connectivity of auditory and visual cortices to auditory and visual speech and non-speech stimuli in CI users (n = 14) and normal-hearing listeners (n = 17) and used functional near-infrared spectroscopy to measure hemodynamic responses. We used visually presented speech and non-speech to investigate neural processes related to linguistic content and observed that CI users show beneficial cross-modal effects. Specifically, an increase in connectivity between the left auditory and visual cortices-presumed primary sites of cortical language processing-was positively correlated with CI users' abilities to understand speech in background noise. Cross-modal activity in auditory cortex of postlingually deaf CI users may reflect adaptive activity of a distributed, multimodal speech network, recruited to enhance speech understanding.

Global burden of ototoxic hearing loss associated with platinum-based cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents cisplatin and carboplatin are widely used in cancer treatment worldwide and may result in ototoxic hearing loss. The high incidence of cancer and salient ototoxic effects of platinum-based compounds pose a global public health threat. The purpose of this study was twofold. First, to estimate the prevalence of ototoxic hearing loss associated with treatment with cisplatin and/or carboplatin via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Second, to estimate the annual global burden of ototoxic hearing loss associated with exposure to cisplatin and/or carboplatin. For the systematic review, three databases were searched (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection) and studies that reported prevalence of objectively measured ototoxic hearing loss in cancer patients were included. A random effects meta-analysis determined pooled prevalence (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of ototoxic hearing loss overall, and estimates were stratified by treatment and patient attributes. Estimates of ototoxic hearing loss burden were created with published global estimates of incident cancers often treated with platinum-based compounds and cancer-specific treatment rates. Eighty-seven records (n = 5077 individuals) were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence of ototoxic hearing loss associated with cisplatin and/or carboplatin exposure was 43.17% [CI 37.93-48.56%]. Prevalence estimates were higher for regimens involving cisplatin (cisplatin only: 49.21% [CI 42.62-55.82%]; cisplatin & carboplatin: 56.05% [CI 45.12-66.43%]) versus carboplatin only (13.47% [CI 8.68-20.32%]). Our crude estimates of burden indicated approximately one million individuals worldwide are likely exposed to cisplatin and/or carboplatin, which would result in almost half a million cases of hearing loss per year, globally. There is an urgent need to reduce impacts of ototoxicity in cancer patients. This can be partially achieved by implementing existing strategies focused on primary, secondary, and tertiary hearing loss prevention. Primary ototoxicity prevention via otoprotectants should be a research and policy priority.

Ototoxic hearing loss from antimalarials: A systematic narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Drugs used in curative and prophylactic antimalarial treatment may be ototoxic and lead to permanent hearing loss, but there is no consensus regarding prevalence and permanence of ototoxic hearing loss caused by antimalarials. The purpose of this systematic narrative review was to synthesize current evidence on antimalarial ototoxicity in human populations. METHOD: Studies published between 2005 and 2018 that reported prevalence of post-treatment hearing loss in individuals treated for malaria were included. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies including data from 21 countries were included. Primary themes of the included studies were to evaluate drug safety and/or efficacy (n = 13) or ototoxic effects of drugs (n = 9). Hearing data were measured objectively in 9 studies. Five studies focused on quinine (or derivates), 10 focused on artemisinin combination therapies, and 7 considered multiple drug combinations. There is a paucity of evidence that thoroughly reports potentially permanent ototoxic effects of antimalarials. CONCLUSIONS: Antimalarial drugs may be ototoxic in some cases. More research in human populations is needed to describe ototoxicity of current antimalarials and of future drugs that will be used/developed in response to antimalarial resistance. It is recommended that randomized trials evaluating drug safety objectively measure and report ototoxic hearing loss as an adverse event.

Prevalence of aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients: A systematic review.

Objectives estimate the prevalence of ototoxic hearing loss in drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients treated with aminoglycoside antibiotics via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Estimate the annual preventable cases of hearing loss in DR-TB patients and leverage findings to discuss primary, secondary and tertiary prevention. Methods studies published between 2005 and 2018 that reported prevalence of post-treatment hearing loss in DR-TB patients were included. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to determine pooled prevalence of ototoxic hearing loss overall and by medication type. Preventable hearing loss cases were estimated using World Health Organization (WHO) data on DR-TB treatment and prevalence determined by the meta-analysis. Results eighteen studies from 10 countries were included. Pooled prevalence of ototoxic hearing loss and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 40.62% CI [32.77- 66.61%] for all drugs (kanamycin: 49.65% CI [32.77- 66.61%], amikacin: 38.93% CI [26.44-53.07%], capreomycin: 10.21% CI [4.33-22.21%]). Non-use of aminoglycosides may result in prevention of approximately 50,000 hearing loss cases annually. Conclusions aminoglycoside use results in high prevalence of ototoxic hearing loss. Widespread prevention of hearing loss can be achieved by following updated WHO guidelines for DR-TB treatment. When hearing loss cannot be avoided, secondary and tertiary prevention should be prioritized.