Genetic susceptibilities and prediction modeling of carbamazepine and allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions in Vietnamese.

Aims: To determine genetic susceptibility markers for carbamazepine (CBZ) and allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in Vietnamese. Methods: A case-control study was performed involving 122 patients with CBZ or allopurinol-induced SCARs and 120 drug tolerant controls. Results:HLA-B*58:01 was strongly associated with allopurinol-induced SCARs and strongly correlated with SNP rs9263726. HLA-B*15:02 was associated with CBZ-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis but not with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. No association was found between HLA-A*31:01 and CBZ-induced SCARs. HLA-B*58:01 and rs3909184 allele A with renal insufficiency were shown to increase the risk of allopurinol-induced SCARs. Conclusion:HLA-B*58:01 and HLA-B*15:02 confer susceptibility to allopurinol-induced SCARs and CBZ-induced SJS/TEN in Vietnamese. SNP rs9263726 can be used as a surrogate marker in identifying HLA-B*58:01.

Gene expression profiling in allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions in Vietnamese.

Aim: To examine gene expression in different clinical phenotypes of allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Materials & methods: Gene expression profiling was performed using microarray on 11 RNA samples (four controls, three hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, four Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis) followed by quantitative real-time PCR in a total of 11 SCARs patients and 11 controls. Results: The biological pathways which were significantly enriched in differentially expressed genes in Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis compared with hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms patients included; cell surface interactions at the vascular wall, immunoregulatory interactions at the immunological synapse and MyD88 signaling pathways. Overexpression of miR146a occurred in allopurinol-tolerant HLA-B*58:01 carriers. Conclusion: Biological pathways are identified which appear to be implicated in determining clinical phenotypes in allopurinol-induced SCARs. Overexpression of miR146a is potentially important for allopurinol tolerance in HLA-B*58:01 carriers.

Assessing cross-reactivity to neuromuscular blocking agents by skin and basophil activation tests in patients with neuromuscular blocking agent anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: Following diagnosis of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) anaphylaxis, identifying safe alternatives for subsequent anaesthesia is critical. A patient with anaphylaxis to one NMBA can also have an allergic reaction to other NMBAs (cross-reactivity). Whilst drug provocation testing is standard for identifying or excluding allergy, there is significant risk. In vitro, after an allergen activates basophils, basophils express surface activation markers that can be measured by basophil activation testing (BAT). We compared cross-reactivity between NMBAs assessed by BAT against that by skin testing. METHODS: All patients attending an anaesthetic allergy clinic in Sydney, Australia between May 2017 and July 2018 diagnosed with NMBA anaphylaxis qualified for this study comparing intradermal skin tests and BAT with a panel of NMBAs (rocuronium, vecuronium, pancuronium, suxamethonium, cisatracurium). RESULTS: Of the 61 patients participating, sensitisation on skin testing and on BAT completely matched in only nine patients (15%). Sensitisation was not in agreement for pancuronium, cisatracurium and rocuronium, but was in agreement for vecuronium and suxamethonium. Nine patients with negative skin tests subsequently tolerated cisatracurium, and one false positive on BAT to cisatracurium was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of BAT in identifying safe NMBAs for subsequent anaesthesia needs further evaluation. BAT detects a different cross-reactivity profile to skin tests. Negative skin testing and BAT might increase confidence in performing drug provocation testing, but this and follow-up of subsequent anaesthesia in our cohort is necessary to determine the clinical significance of BAT sensitisation.

Integrating basophil activation tests into evaluation of perioperative anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking agents.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) remain the leading cause of perioperative anaphylaxis in Australia. Standard evaluation comprises history, skin tests, and in vitro specific immunoglobulin E tests. Drug provocation tests to suspected NMBA culprits are associated with a significant risk. Basophil activation testing (BAT) is a potentially useful in vitro test that is not commercially available in Australia or as part of standard evaluation. METHODS: All patients attending the Anaesthetic Allergy Clinic in Sydney, Australia between May 2017 and July 2018 exposed to an NMBA before the onset of anaphylaxis during their anaesthetic qualified for the study. We recruited 120 patients sequentially who received standard evaluation plus BAT using CD63, CD203c, and CD300a as surface activation markers. RESULTS: BAT results were expressed as % upregulation above the negative control and stimulation index (mean fluorescence index of stimulated sample divided by the negative control). We calculated cut-offs of 4.45% and 1.44 for CD63, and 8.80% and 1.49 for CD203c, respectively. Sensitivity was 77% with specificity of 76%. A subgroup of 10 patients with NMBA anaphylaxis had no sensitisation on skin tests. BAT using CD63 and CD203c showed sensitisation in six of these 10, and adding CD300a identified sensitisation in nine patients. BAT was positive in seven of nine patients with anaphylaxis of unknown aetiology. CONCLUSIONS: BAT may be a useful supplement to the standard evaluation in diagnosing NMBA anaphylaxis in patients with suggestive histories, but no sensitisation on skin tests. Ongoing study of this specific group of patients is required to clarify its utility in clinical practice.

Providing HIV results via SMS one day after testing: more popular than rapid point-of-care tests.

An inner Sydney sexual health service introduced the option to gay and bisexual men of receiving a negative HIV result by SMS to mobile phone one business day after venipuncture (rapid SMS). Men could also choose one of the other options: a point-of-care-test (POCT), by phone, or in-person (clinicians could also require in-person). We followed-up patients choosing the rapid SMS method to ascertain their satisfaction. During 12 months, 473 men had 591 HIV tests. Of these tests, 5.4% were POCTs, 9.1% were in-person, 24% were by phone, and 62% were rapid SMS. HIV POCTs declined from being 22% of result methods in the pre-study period to 5.4% during the rapid SMS intervention period (odds ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.13-0.32, P < 0.0001). Phone/in-person results declined from 78% to 33% (odds ratio 0.14, 95% CI 0.10-0.20, P < 0.0001). SMS was sent by the next business day in 95% of cases; 96% of men were satisfied; and 95% would choose this method for their next test. Of 77 men who previously had an HIV POCT, 56 (73%) elected a rapid SMS result rather than having another POCT. The higher accuracy of conventional serology was commonly expressed as the reason for choosing rapid SMS for results.

Validation of a novel real-time PCR assay for detection of HLA-B*15:02 allele for prevention of carbamazepine - Induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in individuals of Asian ancestry.

OBJECTIVES: Screening for the HLA-B*15:02 allele has been recommended to prevent carbamazepine (CBZ) - induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) in individuals with Asian ancestry. We aimed, therefore, to develop and validate a robust and inexpensive method for detection of the HLA-B*15:02 allele. METHODS: Real-time PCR using TaqMan® probes followed by SYBR® Green was used to detect the HLA-B*15:02 allele prior to treatment with CBZ therapy. RESULTS: A total of 121 samples were tested. The assay has a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 76.84-100.0%), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 96.61-100%), a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 76.84-100%) and a negative predictive value of 100.0% (95% CI: 96.61-100.0%), respectively. There was 100% agreement between our results and genotyping using Luminex SSO/SBT/SSP. The lowest limit of detection of the TaqMan® probe is 0.05ng/µl and the SYBR® Green is 0.5ng/µl of DNA. The unit cost of using the TaqMan® probe followed by SYBR® Green is only $4.7 USD. CONCLUSION: We developed a novel assay for the detection of the HLA-B*15:02 allele, which is robust, inexpensive and suitable for screening individuals of Asian ancestry in the prevention of CBZ-induced SJS/TEN.

Validation of a rapid test for HLA-B*58:01/57:01 allele screening to detect individuals at risk for drug-induced hypersensitivity.

AIM: In prevention of allopurinol and abacavir hypersensitivity, screening HLA-B*58:01/57:01 has been highly recommended prior to commencing these therapies. Therefore, we aimed at developing and validating a rapid and robust screening method for HLA-B*58:01/57:01. MATERIALS & METHODS: Real-time polymerase chain reaction with TaqMan probes was employed to detect HLA-B*58:01/57:01. RESULTS: The newly developed assay has the sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 79.4-100.0%), the specificity of 98.8% (95% CI: 93.6-99.9%), the positive predictive value of 94.1% (95% CI: 71.3-99.9%) and the negative predictive value of 100.0% (95% CI: 95.7-100.0%). The lowest limit of detection is 0.04 ng/µl of DNA. CONCLUSION: The present method is a rapid and robust assay that is appropriate for screening of HLA-B*58:01/*57:01 alleles.

Serum free light chain assay reduces the need for serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis in the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy.

BACKGROUND: The potential for serum free light chain (sFLC) assay measurements to replace urine electrophoresis (uEPG) and to also diminish the need for serum immunofixation (sIFE) in the screening for monoclonal gammopathy was assessed. A testing algorithm for monoclonal protein was developed based on our data and cost analysis. METHODS: Data from 890 consecutive sFLC requests were retrospectively analysed. These included 549 samples for serum electrophoresis (sEPG), 447 for sIFE, and 318 for uEPG and urine immunofixation (uIFE). A total of 219 samples had sFLC, sEPG, sIFE and uEPG + uIFE performed. The ability of different test combinations to detect the presence of monoclonal proteins was compared. RESULTS: The sFLC kappa/lambda ratio (FLC ratio) indicated monoclonal light chains in 12% more samples than uEPG + uIFE. The combination of sEPG and FLC ratio detected monoclonal proteins in 49% more samples than the combination of sEPG and sIFE. Furthermore, the sEPG + FLC ratio combination detected monoclonal protein in 6% more samples than were detected by the combined performance of sEPG, sIFE, uEPG and uIFE. However, non-linearity of the assay, the expense of repeat determinations due to the narrow measuring ranges, and frequent antigen excess checks were found to be limitations of the sFLC assay in this study. CONCLUSION: The FLC ratio is a more sensitive method than uIFE in the detection of monoclonal light chains and may substantially reduce the need for onerous 24 h urine collections. Our proposed algorithm for the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy incorporates the sFLC assay, resulting in a reduction in the performance of labour intensive sIFE and uEPG + uIFE while still increasing the detection of monoclonal proteins.