EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part V - EUS-Guided Therapeutic Interventions (short version).

The fifth section of the Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS) of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) assesses the evidence for all the categories of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment reported to date. Celiac plexus neurolysis and block, vascular intervention, drainage of fluid collections, drainage of biliary and pancreatic ducts, and experimental tumor ablation techniques are discussed. For each topic, all current evidence has been extensively analyzed and summarized into major recommendations for reader consultation (short version; the long version is published online).

EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV - EUS-guided interventions: General Aspects and EUS-guided Sampling (Short Version).

The fourth part of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound describes general aspects of endoscopic ultrasound-guided diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and assesses the evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling. Endoscopic ultrasound combines the most advanced high-resolution ultrasound imaging of lesions within the wall and in the vicinity of the gastrointestinal tract and safe and effective fine needle-based tissue acquisition from these lesions. The guideline addresses the indications, contraindications, techniques, adverse events, training and clinical impact of EUS-guided sampling. Advantages and drawbacks are weighed in comparison with image-guided percutaneous biopsy. Based on the most current evidence, clinical practice recommendations are given for crucial preconditions and steps of EUS-guided sampling as well as for safe performance. Additionally, the guideline deals with the principles and reliability of cytopathological reporting in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling (short version; the long version is published online).

EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV - EUS-guided Interventions: General aspects and EUS-guided sampling (Long Version).

The fourth part of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound describes general aspects of endoscopic ultrasound-guided diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and assesses the evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling. Endoscopic ultrasound combines the most advanced high-resolution ultrasound imaging of lesions within the wall and in the vicinity of the gastrointestinal tract and safe and effective fine needle based tissue acquisition from these lesions. The guideline addresses the indications, contraindications, techniques, adverse events, training and clinical impact of EUS-guided sampling. Advantages and drawbacks are weighed in comparison with image-guided percutaneous biopsy. Based on the most current evidence, clinical practice recommendations are given for crucial preconditions and steps of EUS-guided sampling as well as for safe performance. Additionally, the guideline deals with the principles and reliability of cytopathological reporting in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling (long version).

EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part V.

The fifth section of the Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS) of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) assesses the evidence for all the categories of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment reported to date. Celiac plexus neurolysis and block, vascular intervention, drainage of fluid collections, drainage of biliary and pancreatic ducts, and experimental tumor ablation techniques are discussed. For each topic, all current evidence has been extensively analyzed and summarized into major recommendations for reader consultation in clinical practice (long version).

Contrast enhancement and elastography in endoscopic ultrasound: an overview of clinical applications in pancreatic diseases.

Endoscopic ultrasound is a very accurate imaging technique with a relevant clinical impact in the diagnosis and staging of various conditions such as pancreaticobiliary lesions, esophageal cancer, lung cancer, submucosal lesions and lymph nodes. Despite its increasing importance in everyday clinical routine, endoscopic ultrasound outcomes are still highly operator-dependent and tissue confirmation with fine needle aspiration is very often required for definitive differential diagnosis of tumors. Several techniques of image enhancement have been developed in recent years in the attempt to make the technique less operator-dependent. Among them the most important appear to be contrast harmonic-endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-elastography. Contrast harmonic-endoscopic ultrasound is performed with a dedicated harmonic which displays the fine vascular network of both normal and pathological tissues after injection of an ultrasound contrast agent. Endoscopic ultrasound-elastography displays with different colors the differences in hardness between tissues, thus estimating elasticity in soft normal tissues which appear red and hard neoplastic tissues which appear blue. While contrast harmonic-endoscopic ultrasound has been introduced into clinical practice, endoscopic ultrasound-elastography mainly represents an investigational tool. The purpose of this paper was to review the mechanism of action and the clinical outcomes of contrast harmonic-endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-elastography in pancreatic diseases. Both techniques show promising applications in the study of pancreatic tumors including differential diagnosis and providing guidance to fine needle aspiration.

Usefulness of a second endoscopic arm to improve therapeutic endoscopy in the lower gastrointestinal tract. Preliminary experience - a case series.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a difficult procedure with frequent complications. Our aim was to test the feasibility of utilizing a second endoscopic arm to improve the dissection. An Olympus prototype blind probe, with an external diameter of 6 mm and a 2.8-mm working channel, was used as a second endoscopic arm. Its purpose was to lift the lesion during dissection. The main endoscope served both to perform the dissection and to visualize the second endoscopic arm in the monitor. Eight patients with polypoid lesions in the rectum or distal sigmoid were treated successfully. The procedure was feasible, and submucosal exposure was ameliorated allowing easier dissection. The resection was curative in all cases. No recurrences have been detected during up to 18-months of follow-up. A small perforation and two cases of delayed bleeding were managed nonsurgically. Applying counter-traction with a second endoscopic arm can facilitate submucosal dissection of distal colorectal lesions.

The influence of endoscopic biliary stents on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic head cancer staging.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Biliary stents have been found to interfere with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) tumor (T) and nodal (N) staging in patients with periampullary cancer. Our aim was to determine whether this also occurs in patients with pancreatic head cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied a consecutive series of patients who were undergoing preoperative EUS for diagnosis and staging of suspected pancreatic cancer, some of whom had biliary stents in situ and some of whom did not. The main end point was the uni- and multivariate association of biliary stenting with T and N mis-staging by EUS. The surgical T and N stages were used as gold standards. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were identified (19 with biliary stents in situ and 46 without). Surgical stage T4 was found more frequently in patients with stents (53% vs. 22%, P = 0.014). The T stage by EUS was correct in 85% of the patients without biliary stents and in 47% of the patients with stents. The frequency of mis-staging by EUS was significant only among patients with a biliary stent. The distribution by EUS N stage did not differ significantly from the surgical N-stage distribution in the two groups of patients. According to the multivariate analysis, patients with stents were 6.55 times more likely to be incorrectly T staged (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69-25.49) and 3.71 times more likely to be incorrectly N staged (95% CI 1.11-12.45) than patients without stents. CONCLUSIONS: The results add support to the recommendation that EUS staging of pancreatic head neoplasms should be performed prior to stent placement.

Real-time detection of Helicobacter Pylori infection and atrophic gastritis: comparison between conventional methods and a novel device for gastric juice analysis during endoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastric juice may represent a valuable source of clinicopathological information if properly analyzed. We evaluated the reliability and clinical validity of data obtained using an innovative device (the "Mt 21-42") that analyzes gastric juice, thus allowing the identification of Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophic gastritis of the oxyntic mucosa during endoscopy. METHODS: Validation studies were carried out to evaluate the measuring performance of the device. In addition, the H. pylori status and the presence of atrophic gastritis were assessed in 150 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In all these patients the Mt 21-42 device was used to assist endoscopy. Conventional tests (involving histology, urease testing, urea breath testing, anti- H. pylori IgG, serum gastrin, pepsinogen, intrinsic factor and parietal cells autoantibodies, vitamin B12, and folate) were also performed for comparison with the Mt 21-42 results. RESULTS: The measuring performance of the Mt 21-42 was good; for pH, the relative percent error and the coefficient of variation were 1.9 % +/- 4.2 and 1.3 %, respectively, and for ammonium they were 0.1 % +/- 0.2 % and 2.1 %. For the detection of H. pylori infection, the sensitivity and specificity of the device (96.7 % and 94.3 %) were similar to those of the urea breath test (90.5 % and 93.3 %) and serology (87.1 % and 88.8 %), and higher than those of the urease test (78.6 % and 98.7 %; P < 0.01) and routine histology (94.3 % and 76.3 %; P < 0.05). When compared with the currently available standard methods, use of the Mt 21-42 was found to be the most sensitive technique for the detection of atrophy (94.7 % vs. 5.3 % - 47.4 %; P < 0.001); the device failed to detect the disease in only one case (5 %), whereas failure rates of 53 % - 95 % were reported with the conventional methods. CONCLUSION: Atrophic gastritis of the oxyntic mucosa is a risky condition that often goes undetected in current clinical practice. The Mt 21-42 is an effective, useful, and desirable tool that may help to overcome this diagnostic limitation; it produces time and cost savings and also allows the detection of H. pylori infection.

Present and future of endoscopic ultrasonography.

Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration are well-established techniques, encompassing a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Along with traditional indications that constitute everyday clinical practice in all endoscopic ultrasonography centres, new indications are emerging that resemble the continuing research carried on in this field. Some of these are innovative applications, developed by highly experienced endosonographers and with a putative role for clinical practice in the near future. Others are merely experimental applications, carried out on in animal models or in highly selected groups of patients, opening up new fascinating areas of research but not for imminent introduction in clinical practice. The purpose of this review, after summarising the present indications of endoscopic ultrasonography, is to focus on the future applications and try to establish their possible advent, either in the near or in the far future.

Endoscopic ultrasonography.

This paper covers the literature published between June 2003 and August 2004 on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). During this period, more than 120 original studies were published on the topic, not to mention editorials and case reports--indirect evidence of the ever-increasing importance of EUS in everyday clinical practice. However, due to limitations of space, this review will focus only on a few articles selected for their importance and originality. The studies presented deal either with the outcome of EUS--i. e., its real importance in affecting the choices physicians are faced with in their clinical work--or definitively clarify certain technical issues that have often been a matter of debate at EUS meetings. Finally, a few papers describing new potential diagnostic or interventional applications of EUS are presented. Many other relevant papers in addition to those discussed in detail are cited in the references.

Pancreatic involvement in systemic sarcoidosis. A case report.

We report a case of serum pancreatic hyperenzymemia as a primary manifestation of sarcoidosis; pancreatic involvement was confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography which revealed a notable glandular fibrosis of the pancreas. It is important that patients with systemic sarcoidosis who have increased serum levels of amylase and lipase be checked in order to detect the presence of possible pancreatic involvement. Endoscopic ultrasonography represents the technique of choice used to confirm the clinical suspicion of pancreatic inflammation.

Endoscopic ultrasonography.

This review again uses a practical arrangement of the topics of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) into clinical categories rather than single diseases. The clinical categories include established indications, such as staging of gastrointestinal tract cancers, differential diagnosis of submucosal tumors, evaluation of solid and cystic pancreatic masses, detection of lymph nodes, evaluation of the biliary tree, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA). In addition to established indications, surgical and investigational techniques are presented, such as fine-needle therapeutic procedures and methods of studying portal hypertension and hepatic, abdominal, and retroperitoneal masses. This year, the new techniques and instruments presented have not included new probes or endoscopes, as these have already gained wide application in published papers and clinical practice. However, new techniques capable of facilitating the use of existing equipment are discussed, such as computer-aided EUS image analysis. Finally, some fascinating studies investigated outcomes with EUS and the cost-effectiveness of the method - stimulating both endosonographers and non-endosonographers to think about current practices and ways of improving them.