RESUMO
The aim was to gather an overview of the evidence of monoclonal antibody therapies in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prophylaxis in children. For this umbrella review of previous meta-analyses, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in August 2023. We included systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. One author extracted the data, and another author validated the data. We extracted all analyses focusing on clinical outcomes and comparing prophylaxis to placebo. Risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool was used to analyze the risk of bias in the included reviews. AMSTAR-2 was used to evaluate the quality of the included reviews. After screening of 323 abstracts and 22 full reports, a total of seven systematic reviews with meta-analyses were included. The risk of bias was rated to be low in four and high in three of these. Three reviews were of moderate quality, one low, and three very low quality according to AMSTAR-2 classification. Six of the meta-analyses were direct comparisons, and one was a network meta-analysis. Five of the reviews focused on palivizumab, one in nirsevimab, and one included all monoclonal antibodies. Six reviews focused on preterm neonates and consisted of 42 comparisons to placebo of which 21 showed efficacy, and 21 had no evidence of a difference. The positive effect was seen in all reviews against RSV infection and RSV hospitalization in palivizumab and nirsevimab groups compared to placebo. None of the mortality comparisons showed efficacy. One meta-analysis focused on cystic fibrosis patients and had eight comparisons, but it was underpowered to detect any results. The overall evidence from previous meta-analyses shows that monoclonal antibodies are effective in preventing RSV infections and RSV hospitalizations in preterm infants. However, no effect on mortality was seen in these studies. Evidence certainty has been ranked mainly from low to moderate.
