RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Seat belt syndrome (SBS) is a rare condition described as injuries sustained due to thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic compression in the context of traffic accidents. These injuries can range from minor skin abrasions to large lesions of internal organs and spinal cord involvement. Traumatic abdominal wall hernias (TAWH) are one of the injuries that can be associated. CASE PRESENTATION: A 21-year-old male suffered a severe injury, resulting in complete transection of all abdominal wall musculature due to SBS, with associated visceral injury. Emergency surgery included intestinal and sigmoid colon resection, along with cava vein repair. After a prolonged recovery, a second-stage surgery for abdominal wall reconstruction was planned. Prehabilitation involved botulinum toxin and pneumoperitoneum, with surgical planning utilizing CT scan and 3D reconstruction. The second-stage surgery included transversus abdominis release and placement of double mesh. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Managing traumatic abdominal wall hernias in polytrauma patients necessitates emergent surgery for vital injuries, while reconstructive surgery timing is crucial, with patient preparation being essential. Surgical planning, including 3D reconstructions, enhances accuracy, and safety, with repair technique selection depending on anatomical features. Given our patient's athletic background and preoperative vascular CT findings, flapless reconstructive surgery was chosen to mitigate vascular risks. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic approach to traumatic abdominal wall injuries should be individualized to each patient, with a focus on addressing vital injuries first and considering abdominal wall reconstruction surgery at a subsequent stage. Utilizing CT scan with 3D reconstruction can be a valuable tool for preoperative planning in cases involving significant abdominal wall defects.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To analyze the safety and feasibility of intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in upper rectum, sigmoid, and left colon surgery, via both laparoscopic and robotic approaches. The secondary aim was to assess possible short-term differences between laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study according to IDEAL framework exploration and assessment stage (Development, stage 2a), evaluating and comparing the laparoscopic approach and the robotic approach in left colon, sigmoid, and upper rectum surgery with intracorporeal resection and end-to-end anastomosis. Demographic, preoperative, surgical, and postoperative variables of patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery are described and compared according to the surgical technique used. RESULTS: Between May 2020 and March 2022, seventy-nine patients were consecutively included in the study, 41 operated via laparoscopy (laparoscopic left colectomy: LLC) and 38 by robotic surgery (robotic left colectomy: RLC). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic variables. In surgical variables, the median surgical times differed significantly: 198 min (SD 48 min) for LLC vs. 246 min (SD 72 min) for RLC (p = 0.01, 95% CI: - 75.2 to - 20.5)). The only significant difference regarding postoperative complications was a higher degree of relevant morbidity in the LLC (Clavien-Dindo > II (14.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.03) and Comprehensive Complication Index (IQR 22 vs. IQR 0, p = 0.03). The pathological results were similar in both approaches. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and robotic intracorporeal resection and anastomosis are feasible and safe, and obtain similar surgical, postoperative, and pathological results than described in literature. However, morbidity seems to be higher in LLC group with fewer relevant postoperative complications. The results of this study enable us to proceed to stage 2b of the IDEAL framework. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: The study is registered in Clinical trials with the registration code NCT0445693.
