Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Bone Joint J ; 103-B(3): 536-541, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641409

RESUMO

AIMS: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the correction achieved using a convex pedicle screw technique and a low implant density achieved using periapical concave-sided screws and a high implant density. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcome between the two techniques. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a series of 51 patients with a thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. There were 26 patients in the convex pedicle screw group who had screws implanted periapically (Group 2) and a control group of 25 patients with bilateral pedicle screws (Group 1). The patients' charts were reviewed and pre- and postoperative radiographs evaluated. Postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded. RESULTS: The number of implants (14.5 vs 17.1) and the implant density (1.5 vs 1.9) were significantly lower in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Operating time was 27 minutes shorter in Group 2 than in Group 1, with a mean of 217 minutes (SD 50.5; 120 to 346). The duration of surgery per instrumented vertebra was reduced by 19% in Group 2 (p = 0.011). No statistical difference was found in the postoperative Cobb angle, vertebral rotation, the relative correction achieved, or postoperative PROMs. CONCLUSION: Despite a lower implant density and achieving correction through a convex rod, surgical correction of the Cobb angle and vertebral body rotation was similar in both groups. Periapical pedicle screws and primary correction on the concave side do not seem to be mandatory in order to achieve good surgical results in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. The operating time was shorter in the group with lower implant density. In conclusion, the technique provided good results and has the potential to reduce complications and costs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):536-541.


Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 28(7): 398-402, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24464092

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The benefits of cement augmentation with fixation of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures have been previously demonstrated. The objective of this study was 3-fold: (1) To quantify the intraosseous pressure produced during cement augmentation of the perforated proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) blades; (2) To assess whether the pressure generated is influenced by the injection rate; and (3) To assess the amount of force applied during the injection. METHODS: Six pairs of human cadaveric femurs were used in the study. A basicervical osteotomy was performed, and the heads were instrumented with the PFNA blade. Each pair was randomly assigned into 1 of 2 groups: slow versus rapid injection with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. In the slow group, the augmentation was performed using 6 consecutive 1 mL injections, each over 10 seconds. In the rapid group, each 1 mL injection was performed over 5 seconds. For intraosseous pressure measurements, transmitters were inserted to a depth of 5 mm at both the superior and inferior apices of the head. The reaction forces on the syringe were measured as well. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the slow and rapid injection rates with respect to the peak pressures measured at the 6 time points immediately after cement injection. In both groups, elevations in pressure were transient and returned to baseline values within 30 seconds. The highest pressure recorded in the slow group was 37.3 and 30.7 mm Hg in the rapid group. The force required after each sequential injection increased in both groups; however, significantly higher forces were required to inject cement over 5 than 10 seconds (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro model is the first one to demonstrate that femoral head cement augmentation is associated with a small transient increase in intraosseous pressure with sequential fast and slow 1 mL injections of up to 6 mL PMMA. We conclude that cement augmentation of the perforated PFNA blade carries a low risk of pressure-induced avascular necrosis.


Assuntos
Cimentação , Cabeça do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Cabeça do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pinos Ortopédicos , Cadáver , Cimentação/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pressão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...