Resultados en salud tras la implantación de una guía multidisciplinar para la atención a la fractura de cadera / Health outcomes after the implementation of multidisciplinary clinical guidelines for the care of hip fractures

Antecedentes y objetivo: Evaluar el impacto de la aplicación de una guía clínica multidisciplinar en el proceso de atención a pacientes con fractura de cadera. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo pre y postintervención en una Unidad de Ortogeriatría de un hospital de segundo nivel tras implementar una guía clínica multidisciplinar de atención a la fractura de cadera. Se analizan las características basales de los pacientes y las variaciones observadas en las variables de proceso y de desenlace en los 2períodos estudiados (junio del 2015-mayo del 2016 y junio del 2016-mayo del 2017). Resultados: Las características basales de la población fueron similares en el período preintervención (n = 455) y en el período postintervención (n = 456). La edad media de los pacientes fue 84,8 ± 6,8 años y un 70,8% eran mujeres. La aplicación de la guía clínica multidisciplinar produjo una reducción de la estancia media (16,9 días vs. 15,6 días, p = 0,014) y mejoró la prescripción del tratamiento de la osteoporosis (51,6% vs. 88%, p < 0,001), y redujo los episodios de delirio (44% vs. 31,2%, p < 0,001), broncoespasmo (18,3% vs. 12%, p = 0,019), insuficiencia cardíaca (20% vs. 11,5%, p < 0,001) y enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica agudizada (7,9% vs. 3,8%, p = 0,017). Observamos un incremento de las úlceras por presión al alta (2,9% vs. 9%, p = 0,001). No hubo diferencias en la proporción de pacientes operados en menos de 48 h (56% vs. 61,2%, p = 0,64), en reingresos hospitalarios (6,9% vs. 5,9%, p = 0,51) ni en mortalidad (5,0% vs. 7,2%, p = 0,17). Conclusiones: La implantación de una guía clínica multidisciplinar mejoró aspectos del proceso de atención a los pacientes con fractura de cadera (AU)

Background and objectives: This study aims to evaluate the impact of implementing multidisciplinary clinical guidelines in the process of caring for patients with hip fractures. Materials and methods: This work is a pre- and post-intervention prospective study in the Orthogeriatrics Unit of a second-level hospital after implementing multidisciplinary clinical guidelines for hip fracture care. We analyzed patients’ baseline characteristics and the variations observed in care provided and in outcome variables in the 2periods studied (June 2015-May 2016 and June 2016-May 2017). Results: The baseline characteristics of the population were similar in the pre-intervention period (n=455) compared to the post-intervention period (n=456). Patients’ mean age was 84.8 ± 6.8 years and 70.8% were women. The implementation of the multidisciplinary clinical guidelines led to a reduction in the mean length of hospital stay (16.9 days vs 15.6 days, p=.014); improved osteoporosis treatment prescribing (51.6% vs 88%, p<.001); and reduced episodes of delirium (44% vs 31.2%, p<.001), bronchospasm (18.3% vs 12%, p=.019), heart failure (20% vs 11.5%, p<.001), and COPD exacerbation (7.9% vs 3.8%, p=.017). We observed an increase in pressure ulcers at discharge (2.9 vs 9%, p<.001). There were no differences in the percentage of operations in less than 48hours (56% vs 61.2% p=.64), hospital readmissions (6.9% vs 5.9%, p=.51), or mortality (5.0% vs 7.2%, p=.17). Conclusions:The implementation of multidisciplinary clinical guidelines improved aspects of the care process for patients with hip fracture (AU)

Health outcomes after the implementation of multidisciplinary clinical guidelines for the care of hip fractures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the impact of implementing multidisciplinary clinical guidelines in the process of caring for patients with hip fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This work is a pre- and post-intervention prospective study in the Orthogeriatrics Unit of a second-level hospital after implementing multidisciplinary clinical guidelines for hip fracture care. We analyzed patients' baseline characteristics and the variations observed in care provided and in outcome variables in the two periods studied (June 2015-May 2016 and June 2016-May 2017). RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the population were similar in the pre-intervention period (n = 455) compared to the post-intervention period (n = 456). Patients' mean age was 84.8 ± 6.8 years and 70.8% were women. The implementation of the multidisciplinary clinical guidelines led to a reduction in the mean length of hospital stay (16.9 days vs. 15.6 days, p= .014); improved osteoporosis treatment prescribing (51.6% vs. 88%, p< .001); and reduced episodes of delirium (44% vs. 31.2%, p < .001), bronchospasm (18.3% vs. 12%, p = .019), heart failure (20% vs. 11.5%, p < .001), and COPD exacerbation (7.9% vs. 3.8%, P = .017). We observed an increase in pressure ulcers at discharge (2.9 vs. 9%, P < .001). There were no differences in the percentage of operations in less than 48 h (56% vs. 61.2% p = .64), hospital readmissions (6.9% vs. 5.9%, p = .51), or mortality (5.0% vs. 7.2%, p = .17). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of multidisciplinary clinical guidelines improved aspects of the care process for patients with hip fracture.